You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> on 2008/10/16 09:23:17 UTC
[GSHELL] Timeframe ?
In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest trunk of
GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade locally on
my HD. Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that yesterday.
However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We currently use
an old and unreleased version of gshell, but I'd like to avoid such
issue and having to rewrite this integration once more.
Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in terms of APIs)
and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or whatever) ?
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
I'll start a release asap.
I know you've worked on the release process.
Should a simple
mvn release:prepare release:perform -Dgpg.passphrase=xxx
-DaltDeploymentRepository=yyy
work ? Or is there a better way to release gshell ?
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 11:59, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> That should be fine.
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
>> I've just build gshell using maven-project-2.1.0-M1 and it builds and
>> starts correctly.
>> Maybe we sould use that one instead ? or does r721111 includes other
>> mandatory fixes ?
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 09:07, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> maven-project-2.1.0-r721111 is on the nexus instance on our zone, but
>>> looks
>>> like its not running, not sure why... will take a look in a bit.
>>>
>>> --jason
>>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 4, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>
>>>> Done. I still have a problem with the dependency on
>>>> maven-project-2.1.0-r721111 which I can't found anymore.
>>>> I will try to upgrade to 3.0-alpha-1 and see what it gives.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 04:47, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, go ahead.
>>>>>
>>>>> --jason
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel before this month.
>>>>>> Do you want me to roll back to genesis 1.6 ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 06:14, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, I think its mostly Genesis 2.0 that is causing the lag on
>>>>>>> GShell's
>>>>>>> release. I'm going to see about fixing that this week, otherwise
>>>>>>> rolling
>>>>>>> back to the Genesis 1.6 stuff for the alpha-2.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --jason
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel in the near future.
>>>>>>>> What are the missing bits to release GShell soon ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:25, Jason Dillon <ja...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability. The
>>>>>>>>> major
>>>>>>>>> changes have all been committed, and I don't have any plans to make
>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>> other significant changes to the core APIs. What I am doing now is
>>>>>>>>> trying
>>>>>>>>> to slim down the core dependencies and speed up the boot time...
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> sorting
>>>>>>>>> out some of the many HACK/TODO comments which I've littered the
>>>>>>>>> codebase
>>>>>>>>> with.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As for an alpha-2 release, I imagine that will be on the horizon
>>>>>>>>> soon.
>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> don't plan on having all of the little things fixed before that,
>>>>>>>>> though
>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> hope to sort out a few of the more significant ones before
>>>>>>>>> releasing.
>>>>>>>>> If
>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> had to guess I'd say that the codebase should be in a position to
>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>> released in 2-4 weeks at present change velocity.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --jason
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest trunk of
>>>>>>>>>> GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade
>>>>>>>>>> locally
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>> my HD. Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that
>>>>>>>>>> yesterday.
>>>>>>>>>> However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We currently
>>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>> an old and unreleased version of gshell, but I'd like to avoid
>>>>>>>>>> such
>>>>>>>>>> issue and having to rewrite this integration once more.
>>>>>>>>>> Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in terms of
>>>>>>>>>> APIs)
>>>>>>>>>> and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or whatever) ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>>>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>>>>>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>>>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
That should be fine.
--jason
On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I've just build gshell using maven-project-2.1.0-M1 and it builds and
> starts correctly.
> Maybe we sould use that one instead ? or does r721111 includes other
> mandatory fixes ?
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 09:07, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
>> maven-project-2.1.0-r721111 is on the nexus instance on our zone,
>> but looks
>> like its not running, not sure why... will take a look in a bit.
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Feb 4, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>
>>> Done. I still have a problem with the dependency on
>>> maven-project-2.1.0-r721111 which I can't found anymore.
>>> I will try to upgrade to 3.0-alpha-1 and see what it gives.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 04:47, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, go ahead.
>>>>
>>>> --jason
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel before this month.
>>>>> Do you want me to roll back to genesis 1.6 ?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 06:14, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, I think its mostly Genesis 2.0 that is causing the lag on
>>>>>> GShell's
>>>>>> release. I'm going to see about fixing that this week, otherwise
>>>>>> rolling
>>>>>> back to the Genesis 1.6 stuff for the alpha-2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --jason
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel in the near
>>>>>>> future.
>>>>>>> What are the missing bits to release GShell soon ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:25, Jason Dillon <jason.dillon@gmail.com
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability.
>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>> major
>>>>>>>> changes have all been committed, and I don't have any plans
>>>>>>>> to make
>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>> other significant changes to the core APIs. What I am doing
>>>>>>>> now is
>>>>>>>> trying
>>>>>>>> to slim down the core dependencies and speed up the boot
>>>>>>>> time... and
>>>>>>>> sorting
>>>>>>>> out some of the many HACK/TODO comments which I've littered the
>>>>>>>> codebase
>>>>>>>> with.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As for an alpha-2 release, I imagine that will be on the
>>>>>>>> horizon
>>>>>>>> soon.
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>> don't plan on having all of the little things fixed before
>>>>>>>> that,
>>>>>>>> though
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>> hope to sort out a few of the more significant ones before
>>>>>>>> releasing.
>>>>>>>> If
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>> had to guess I'd say that the codebase should be in a
>>>>>>>> position to be
>>>>>>>> released in 2-4 weeks at present change velocity.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --jason
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest
>>>>>>>>> trunk of
>>>>>>>>> GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade
>>>>>>>>> locally
>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>> my HD. Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that
>>>>>>>>> yesterday.
>>>>>>>>> However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We
>>>>>>>>> currently
>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>> an old and unreleased version of gshell, but I'd like to
>>>>>>>>> avoid such
>>>>>>>>> issue and having to rewrite this integration once more.
>>>>>>>>> Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in
>>>>>>>>> terms of
>>>>>>>>> APIs)
>>>>>>>>> and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or
>>>>>>>>> whatever) ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>>>>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> ------------------------
>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> ------------------------
>>> Open Source SOA
>>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
I've just build gshell using maven-project-2.1.0-M1 and it builds and
starts correctly.
Maybe we sould use that one instead ? or does r721111 includes other
mandatory fixes ?
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 09:07, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> maven-project-2.1.0-r721111 is on the nexus instance on our zone, but looks
> like its not running, not sure why... will take a look in a bit.
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Feb 4, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
>> Done. I still have a problem with the dependency on
>> maven-project-2.1.0-r721111 which I can't found anymore.
>> I will try to upgrade to 3.0-alpha-1 and see what it gives.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 04:47, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, go ahead.
>>>
>>> --jason
>>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>
>>>> We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel before this month.
>>>> Do you want me to roll back to genesis 1.6 ?
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 06:14, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, I think its mostly Genesis 2.0 that is causing the lag on
>>>>> GShell's
>>>>> release. I'm going to see about fixing that this week, otherwise
>>>>> rolling
>>>>> back to the Genesis 1.6 stuff for the alpha-2.
>>>>>
>>>>> --jason
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel in the near future.
>>>>>> What are the missing bits to release GShell soon ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:25, Jason Dillon <ja...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability. The
>>>>>>> major
>>>>>>> changes have all been committed, and I don't have any plans to make
>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>> other significant changes to the core APIs. What I am doing now is
>>>>>>> trying
>>>>>>> to slim down the core dependencies and speed up the boot time... and
>>>>>>> sorting
>>>>>>> out some of the many HACK/TODO comments which I've littered the
>>>>>>> codebase
>>>>>>> with.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As for an alpha-2 release, I imagine that will be on the horizon
>>>>>>> soon.
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>> don't plan on having all of the little things fixed before that,
>>>>>>> though
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>> hope to sort out a few of the more significant ones before releasing.
>>>>>>> If
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>> had to guess I'd say that the codebase should be in a position to be
>>>>>>> released in 2-4 weeks at present change velocity.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --jason
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest trunk of
>>>>>>>> GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade locally
>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>> my HD. Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that yesterday.
>>>>>>>> However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We currently
>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>> an old and unreleased version of gshell, but I'd like to avoid such
>>>>>>>> issue and having to rewrite this integration once more.
>>>>>>>> Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in terms of
>>>>>>>> APIs)
>>>>>>>> and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or whatever) ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>>>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
maven-project-2.1.0-r721111 is on the nexus instance on our zone, but
looks like its not running, not sure why... will take a look in a bit.
--jason
On Feb 4, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Done. I still have a problem with the dependency on
> maven-project-2.1.0-r721111 which I can't found anymore.
> I will try to upgrade to 3.0-alpha-1 and see what it gives.
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 04:47, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
>> Yes, go ahead.
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>
>>> We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel before this month.
>>> Do you want me to roll back to genesis 1.6 ?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 06:14, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Well, I think its mostly Genesis 2.0 that is causing the lag on
>>>> GShell's
>>>> release. I'm going to see about fixing that this week, otherwise
>>>> rolling
>>>> back to the Genesis 1.6 stuff for the alpha-2.
>>>>
>>>> --jason
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel in the near future.
>>>>> What are the missing bits to release GShell soon ?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:25, Jason Dillon <jason.dillon@gmail.com
>>>>> >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability.
>>>>>> The major
>>>>>> changes have all been committed, and I don't have any plans to
>>>>>> make any
>>>>>> other significant changes to the core APIs. What I am doing
>>>>>> now is
>>>>>> trying
>>>>>> to slim down the core dependencies and speed up the boot
>>>>>> time... and
>>>>>> sorting
>>>>>> out some of the many HACK/TODO comments which I've littered the
>>>>>> codebase
>>>>>> with.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As for an alpha-2 release, I imagine that will be on the
>>>>>> horizon soon.
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> don't plan on having all of the little things fixed before
>>>>>> that, though
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> hope to sort out a few of the more significant ones before
>>>>>> releasing.
>>>>>> If
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> had to guess I'd say that the codebase should be in a position
>>>>>> to be
>>>>>> released in 2-4 weeks at present change velocity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --jason
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest
>>>>>>> trunk of
>>>>>>> GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade
>>>>>>> locally on
>>>>>>> my HD. Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that
>>>>>>> yesterday.
>>>>>>> However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We
>>>>>>> currently use
>>>>>>> an old and unreleased version of gshell, but I'd like to avoid
>>>>>>> such
>>>>>>> issue and having to rewrite this integration once more.
>>>>>>> Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in terms
>>>>>>> of APIs)
>>>>>>> and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or
>>>>>>> whatever) ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> ------------------------
>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> ------------------------
>>> Open Source SOA
>>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Done. I still have a problem with the dependency on
maven-project-2.1.0-r721111 which I can't found anymore.
I will try to upgrade to 3.0-alpha-1 and see what it gives.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 04:47, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> Yes, go ahead.
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
>> We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel before this month.
>> Do you want me to roll back to genesis 1.6 ?
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 06:14, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, I think its mostly Genesis 2.0 that is causing the lag on GShell's
>>> release. I'm going to see about fixing that this week, otherwise rolling
>>> back to the Genesis 1.6 stuff for the alpha-2.
>>>
>>> --jason
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>
>>>> We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel in the near future.
>>>> What are the missing bits to release GShell soon ?
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:25, Jason Dillon <ja...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability. The major
>>>>> changes have all been committed, and I don't have any plans to make any
>>>>> other significant changes to the core APIs. What I am doing now is
>>>>> trying
>>>>> to slim down the core dependencies and speed up the boot time... and
>>>>> sorting
>>>>> out some of the many HACK/TODO comments which I've littered the
>>>>> codebase
>>>>> with.
>>>>>
>>>>> As for an alpha-2 release, I imagine that will be on the horizon soon.
>>>>> I
>>>>> don't plan on having all of the little things fixed before that, though
>>>>> I
>>>>> hope to sort out a few of the more significant ones before releasing.
>>>>> If
>>>>> I
>>>>> had to guess I'd say that the codebase should be in a position to be
>>>>> released in 2-4 weeks at present change velocity.
>>>>>
>>>>> --jason
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest trunk of
>>>>>> GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade locally on
>>>>>> my HD. Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that yesterday.
>>>>>> However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We currently use
>>>>>> an old and unreleased version of gshell, but I'd like to avoid such
>>>>>> issue and having to rewrite this integration once more.
>>>>>> Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in terms of APIs)
>>>>>> and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or whatever) ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Yes, go ahead.
--jason
On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel before this month.
> Do you want me to roll back to genesis 1.6 ?
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 06:14, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>
> wrote:
>> Well, I think its mostly Genesis 2.0 that is causing the lag on
>> GShell's
>> release. I'm going to see about fixing that this week, otherwise
>> rolling
>> back to the Genesis 1.6 stuff for the alpha-2.
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>
>>> We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel in the near future.
>>> What are the missing bits to release GShell soon ?
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:25, Jason Dillon <ja...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability. The
>>>> major
>>>> changes have all been committed, and I don't have any plans to
>>>> make any
>>>> other significant changes to the core APIs. What I am doing now is
>>>> trying
>>>> to slim down the core dependencies and speed up the boot time...
>>>> and
>>>> sorting
>>>> out some of the many HACK/TODO comments which I've littered the
>>>> codebase
>>>> with.
>>>>
>>>> As for an alpha-2 release, I imagine that will be on the horizon
>>>> soon. I
>>>> don't plan on having all of the little things fixed before that,
>>>> though I
>>>> hope to sort out a few of the more significant ones before
>>>> releasing. If
>>>> I
>>>> had to guess I'd say that the codebase should be in a position to
>>>> be
>>>> released in 2-4 weeks at present change velocity.
>>>>
>>>> --jason
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest trunk of
>>>>> GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade
>>>>> locally on
>>>>> my HD. Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that
>>>>> yesterday.
>>>>> However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We
>>>>> currently use
>>>>> an old and unreleased version of gshell, but I'd like to avoid
>>>>> such
>>>>> issue and having to rewrite this integration once more.
>>>>> Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in terms of
>>>>> APIs)
>>>>> and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or whatever) ?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> ------------------------
>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> ------------------------
>>> Open Source SOA
>>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel before this month.
Do you want me to roll back to genesis 1.6 ?
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 06:14, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> Well, I think its mostly Genesis 2.0 that is causing the lag on GShell's
> release. I'm going to see about fixing that this week, otherwise rolling
> back to the Genesis 1.6 stuff for the alpha-2.
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
>> We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel in the near future.
>> What are the missing bits to release GShell soon ?
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:25, Jason Dillon <ja...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability. The major
>>> changes have all been committed, and I don't have any plans to make any
>>> other significant changes to the core APIs. What I am doing now is
>>> trying
>>> to slim down the core dependencies and speed up the boot time... and
>>> sorting
>>> out some of the many HACK/TODO comments which I've littered the codebase
>>> with.
>>>
>>> As for an alpha-2 release, I imagine that will be on the horizon soon. I
>>> don't plan on having all of the little things fixed before that, though I
>>> hope to sort out a few of the more significant ones before releasing. If
>>> I
>>> had to guess I'd say that the codebase should be in a position to be
>>> released in 2-4 weeks at present change velocity.
>>>
>>> --jason
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>
>>>> In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest trunk of
>>>> GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade locally on
>>>> my HD. Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that yesterday.
>>>> However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We currently use
>>>> an old and unreleased version of gshell, but I'd like to avoid such
>>>> issue and having to rewrite this integration once more.
>>>> Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in terms of APIs)
>>>> and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or whatever) ?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Well, I think its mostly Genesis 2.0 that is causing the lag on
GShell's release. I'm going to see about fixing that this week,
otherwise rolling back to the Genesis 1.6 stuff for the alpha-2.
--jason
On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel in the near future.
> What are the missing bits to release GShell soon ?
>
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:25, Jason Dillon <ja...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability. The
>> major
>> changes have all been committed, and I don't have any plans to make
>> any
>> other significant changes to the core APIs. What I am doing now is
>> trying
>> to slim down the core dependencies and speed up the boot time...
>> and sorting
>> out some of the many HACK/TODO comments which I've littered the
>> codebase
>> with.
>>
>> As for an alpha-2 release, I imagine that will be on the horizon
>> soon. I
>> don't plan on having all of the little things fixed before that,
>> though I
>> hope to sort out a few of the more significant ones before
>> releasing. If I
>> had to guess I'd say that the codebase should be in a position to be
>> released in 2-4 weeks at present change velocity.
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>
>>> In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest trunk of
>>> GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade
>>> locally on
>>> my HD. Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that yesterday.
>>> However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We currently
>>> use
>>> an old and unreleased version of gshell, but I'd like to avoid such
>>> issue and having to rewrite this integration once more.
>>> Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in terms of
>>> APIs)
>>> and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or whatever) ?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> ------------------------
>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> ------------------------
>>> Open Source SOA
>>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Well, I think its mostly Genesis 2.0 that is causing the lag on
GShell's release. I'm going to see about fixing that this week,
otherwise rolling back to the Genesis 1.6 stuff for the alpha-2.
--jason
On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel in the near future.
> What are the missing bits to release GShell soon ?
>
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:25, Jason Dillon <ja...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability. The
>> major
>> changes have all been committed, and I don't have any plans to make
>> any
>> other significant changes to the core APIs. What I am doing now is
>> trying
>> to slim down the core dependencies and speed up the boot time...
>> and sorting
>> out some of the many HACK/TODO comments which I've littered the
>> codebase
>> with.
>>
>> As for an alpha-2 release, I imagine that will be on the horizon
>> soon. I
>> don't plan on having all of the little things fixed before that,
>> though I
>> hope to sort out a few of the more significant ones before
>> releasing. If I
>> had to guess I'd say that the codebase should be in a position to be
>> released in 2-4 weeks at present change velocity.
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>
>>> In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest trunk of
>>> GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade
>>> locally on
>>> my HD. Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that yesterday.
>>> However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We currently
>>> use
>>> an old and unreleased version of gshell, but I'd like to avoid such
>>> issue and having to rewrite this integration once more.
>>> Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in terms of
>>> APIs)
>>> and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or whatever) ?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> ------------------------
>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> ------------------------
>>> Open Source SOA
>>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel in the near future.
What are the missing bits to release GShell soon ?
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:25, Jason Dillon <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability. The major
> changes have all been committed, and I don't have any plans to make any
> other significant changes to the core APIs. What I am doing now is trying
> to slim down the core dependencies and speed up the boot time... and sorting
> out some of the many HACK/TODO comments which I've littered the codebase
> with.
>
> As for an alpha-2 release, I imagine that will be on the horizon soon. I
> don't plan on having all of the little things fixed before that, though I
> hope to sort out a few of the more significant ones before releasing. If I
> had to guess I'd say that the codebase should be in a position to be
> released in 2-4 weeks at present change velocity.
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
>> In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest trunk of
>> GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade locally on
>> my HD. Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that yesterday.
>> However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We currently use
>> an old and unreleased version of gshell, but I'd like to avoid such
>> issue and having to rewrite this integration once more.
>> Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in terms of APIs)
>> and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or whatever) ?
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel in the near future.
What are the missing bits to release GShell soon ?
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:25, Jason Dillon <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability. The major
> changes have all been committed, and I don't have any plans to make any
> other significant changes to the core APIs. What I am doing now is trying
> to slim down the core dependencies and speed up the boot time... and sorting
> out some of the many HACK/TODO comments which I've littered the codebase
> with.
>
> As for an alpha-2 release, I imagine that will be on the horizon soon. I
> don't plan on having all of the little things fixed before that, though I
> hope to sort out a few of the more significant ones before releasing. If I
> had to guess I'd say that the codebase should be in a position to be
> released in 2-4 weeks at present change velocity.
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
>> In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest trunk of
>> GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade locally on
>> my HD. Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that yesterday.
>> However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We currently use
>> an old and unreleased version of gshell, but I'd like to avoid such
>> issue and having to rewrite this integration once more.
>> Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in terms of APIs)
>> and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or whatever) ?
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@gmail.com>.
The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability. The major
changes have all been committed, and I don't have any plans to make
any other significant changes to the core APIs. What I am doing now
is trying to slim down the core dependencies and speed up the boot
time... and sorting out some of the many HACK/TODO comments which I've
littered the codebase with.
As for an alpha-2 release, I imagine that will be on the horizon
soon. I don't plan on having all of the little things fixed before
that, though I hope to sort out a few of the more significant ones
before releasing. If I had to guess I'd say that the codebase should
be in a position to be released in 2-4 weeks at present change velocity.
--jason
On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest trunk of
> GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade locally on
> my HD. Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that yesterday.
> However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We currently use
> an old and unreleased version of gshell, but I'd like to avoid such
> issue and having to rewrite this integration once more.
> Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in terms of APIs)
> and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or whatever) ?
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@gmail.com>.
The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability. The major
changes have all been committed, and I don't have any plans to make
any other significant changes to the core APIs. What I am doing now
is trying to slim down the core dependencies and speed up the boot
time... and sorting out some of the many HACK/TODO comments which I've
littered the codebase with.
As for an alpha-2 release, I imagine that will be on the horizon
soon. I don't plan on having all of the little things fixed before
that, though I hope to sort out a few of the more significant ones
before releasing. If I had to guess I'd say that the codebase should
be in a position to be released in 2-4 weeks at present change velocity.
--jason
On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest trunk of
> GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade locally on
> my HD. Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that yesterday.
> However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We currently use
> an old and unreleased version of gshell, but I'd like to avoid such
> issue and having to rewrite this integration once more.
> Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in terms of APIs)
> and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or whatever) ?
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com