You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to ojb-user@db.apache.org by Artur Z <ar...@o2.pl> on 2004/07/29 22:42:29 UTC
OJB/JDO
hello
I searched the archive and I have not found answers so please tell me:
- is it still impossible to use OJB/JDO in production (because of the sun's JDORI license) ?
- when apache implementation of JDO will be ready ?
- why JDO api is better than ODMG (I mean functionality, usability) ?
only a few days left me for making decision about deep going into OJB, so please help me found the answers
Best regards
Artur
Re: OJB/JDO
Posted by Brian McCallister <mc...@forthillcompany.com>.
On Jul 29, 2004, at 5:53 PM, Artur Z wrote:
> thanks form reply
>
> correct me if i'm wrong, but if everything will go as planed the
> apache JDO
> implementation will be ready by november ?
That is my personal plan, not an official one, and is subject to the
whims of the JDO expert group changing everything. In other words, it
is a best guess on my part.
-Brian
> Artur
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brian McCallister" <mc...@forthillcompany.com>
> To: "OJB Users List" <oj...@db.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 11:27 PM
> Subject: Re: OJB/JDO
>
>
>>
>> On Jul 29, 2004, at 4:42 PM, Artur Z wrote:
>>
>>> hello
>>>
>>> I searched the archive and I have not found answers so please tell
>>> me:
>>>
>>> - is it still impossible to use OJB/JDO in production (because of the
>>> sun's JDORI license) ?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>>> - when apache implementation of JDO will be ready ?
>>
>> Good question. We are working on this, but can always use help =) I
>> *hope* to have it production worthy and compliant with the JDO2 spec
>> by
>> november.
>>
>>> - why JDO api is better than ODMG (I mean functionality, usability) ?
>>
>> It does support a few things ODMG doesn't -- attach/detach, efficient
>> query by identity, explicit optimistic transaction support.
>>
>> -Brian
>>
>>>
>>> only a few days left me for making decision about deep going into
>>> OJB,
>>> so please help me found the answers
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>> Artur
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@db.apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@db.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@db.apache.org
Re: OJB/JDO
Posted by Artur Z <ar...@o2.pl>.
thanks form reply
correct me if i'm wrong, but if everything will go as planed the apache JDO
implementation will be ready by november ?
Artur
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian McCallister" <mc...@forthillcompany.com>
To: "OJB Users List" <oj...@db.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: OJB/JDO
>
> On Jul 29, 2004, at 4:42 PM, Artur Z wrote:
>
> > hello
> >
> > I searched the archive and I have not found answers so please tell me:
> >
> > - is it still impossible to use OJB/JDO in production (because of the
> > sun's JDORI license) ?
>
> Yes
>
> > - when apache implementation of JDO will be ready ?
>
> Good question. We are working on this, but can always use help =) I
> *hope* to have it production worthy and compliant with the JDO2 spec by
> november.
>
> > - why JDO api is better than ODMG (I mean functionality, usability) ?
>
> It does support a few things ODMG doesn't -- attach/detach, efficient
> query by identity, explicit optimistic transaction support.
>
> -Brian
>
> >
> > only a few days left me for making decision about deep going into OJB,
> > so please help me found the answers
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Artur
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@db.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@db.apache.org
Re: OJB/JDO
Posted by Brian McCallister <mc...@forthillcompany.com>.
On Jul 29, 2004, at 4:42 PM, Artur Z wrote:
> hello
>
> I searched the archive and I have not found answers so please tell me:
>
> - is it still impossible to use OJB/JDO in production (because of the
> sun's JDORI license) ?
Yes
> - when apache implementation of JDO will be ready ?
Good question. We are working on this, but can always use help =) I
*hope* to have it production worthy and compliant with the JDO2 spec by
november.
> - why JDO api is better than ODMG (I mean functionality, usability) ?
It does support a few things ODMG doesn't -- attach/detach, efficient
query by identity, explicit optimistic transaction support.
-Brian
>
> only a few days left me for making decision about deep going into OJB,
> so please help me found the answers
>
> Best regards
>
> Artur
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@db.apache.org