[GitHub] [superset] justinpark commented on issue #21385: [SIP-93] Proposal for non-blocking SQL Lab persistence

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

justinpark commented on issue #21385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/21385#issuecomment-1332768481

   > If it's the latter, we could reuse the same feature flag given that we're planning to clean up the current state, which will modify the existing feature anyway.
   
   @michael-s-molina 
   You're right but I suggested new feature flag to reduce the failure/loss of existing persist functionality due to the error by new integration.
   
   I hope to make new async persistence option first and then replace/consolidate with the same persist feature flag name once no running bugs found from our cases.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@superset.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@superset.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: notifications-help@superset.apache.org