svn commit: r1442867 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/reporter.c

[iv...@apache.org]

Author: ivan
Date: Wed Feb  6 08:42:40 2013
New Revision: 1442867

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1442867&view=rev
Log:
Follow-up to r1442555: Fix comment text. No functional changes.

Suggested by: cmpilato

* subversion/libsvn_repos/reporter.c
  (delta_files): Fix comment.

Modified:
    subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/reporter.c

Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/reporter.c
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/reporter.c?rev=1442867&r1=1442866&r2=1442867&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/reporter.c (original)
+++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/reporter.c Wed Feb  6 08:42:40 2013
@@ -687,12 +687,10 @@ delta_files(report_baton_t *b, void *fil
     {
       SVN_ERR(get_source_root(b, &s_root, s_rev));
 
-      /* Is this delta calculation worth our time? We'll do everything we can
-         to avoid transmitting even an empty text-delta in that case.
-         It doesn't matter if we are ignoring ancestry or not: we're not
-         interested in theoretical differences between "has contents which
-         have not changed with respect to" and "has the same actual contents
-         as" when sending text-delta. */
+      /* We're not interested in the theoretical difference between "has
+         contents which have not changed with respect to" and "has the same
+         actual contents as" when sending text-deltas.  If we know the
+         delta is an empty one, we avoiding sending it in either case. */
       SVN_ERR(svn_repos__compare_files(&changed, b->t_root, t_path,
                                        s_root, s_path, pool));