You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> on 2010/06/11 18:46:20 UTC
[VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.6-alpha are (will be) available
at:
<http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/>
Your votes please;
+/- 1
[ ] Release httpd-2.3.6 as Alpha
Vote closes at 15:00 UTC on Wednesday June 16 2010.
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha
Posted by Chris Darroch <ch...@pearsoncmg.com>.
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.6-alpha are (will be) available
> at:
>
> <http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/>
>
> Your votes please;
>
> +/- 1
> [ ] Release httpd-2.3.6 as Alpha
>
> Vote closes at 15:00 UTC on Wednesday June 16 2010.
I think I'm just squeaking in under the deadline:
[+1] Release httpd-2.3.6 as Alpha
I built from the .tar.bz2 and -deps.tar.bz2 packages on my
crusty old Linux 2.6.15 box with gcc 4.1.2, and --enable-modules=all.
Server started OK, mod_status and mod_info info looked good.
Otherwise no heavy testing.
I checked the GPG sigs on the *.tar.bz2 files but not the others,
sorry.
Thanks!
Chris.
--
GPG Key ID: 088335A9
GPG Key Fingerprint: 86CD 3297 7493 75BC F820 6715 F54F E648 0883 35A9
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On Jun 11, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.6-alpha are (will be) available
> at:
>
> <http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/>
>
> Your votes please;
>
> +/- 1
> [ ] Release httpd-2.3.6 as Alpha
>
> Vote closes at 15:00 UTC on Wednesday June 16 2010.
>
+1
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 16, 2010, at 8:31 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>>>> C'mon... any other votes? :)
>>>
>>> I'm working on it, but so far I can't get the two tarballs to build on
>>> Solaris 10 with "./configure --prefix=FOO", apparently due to some
>>> libtool version issue down in expat
>>
>> Sol10 on Intel or Sparc?
>
> S10 Update 5 on Intel
>
> apparently it is the use of bundled expat
>
> checking Expat 1.95.x... no
> checking old Debian-packaged expat... no
> checking old FreeBSD-packaged expat... no
> checking Expat 1.0/1.1... no
> setting LDFLAGS to "-L/usr/local/lib"
> adding "-I/usr/local/include" to CPPFLAGS
> checking Expat 1.95.x in /usr/local... no
> nulling LDFLAGS
> removed "-I/usr/local/include" from CPPFLAGS
> configuring package in xml/expat now
> checking build system type... i386-pc-solaris2.10
> checking host system type... i386-pc-solaris2.10
> checking target system type... i386-pc-solaris2.10
> /export/home/trawick/opensource/httpd-2.3.6/srclib/apr-util/xml/expat/configure:
> line 3352: syntax error near unexpected token `lt_decl_varnames,'
> /export/home/trawick/opensource/httpd-2.3.6/srclib/apr-util/xml/expat/configure:
> line 3352: `lt_if_append_uniq(lt_decl_varnames, SED, , ,'
> configure failed for xml/expat
> configure failed for srclib/apr-util
>
> $ ls -l srclib/apr-util/xml/expat/configure
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 trawick other 430902 Jun 11 08:15
> srclib/apr-util/xml/expat/configure
>
> I should try "--with-expat=builtin" on a system where system expat is
> normally used and see if I get the same issue.
same failure on Ubuntu after adding"--with-expat=builtin" due to
unresolved libtool macros in apr-util/xml/expat/configure
users without system expat can presumably build expat separately and
point to that
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>
> On Jun 16, 2010, at 8:31 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>>> C'mon... any other votes? :)
>>
>> I'm working on it, but so far I can't get the two tarballs to build on
>> Solaris 10 with "./configure --prefix=FOO", apparently due to some
>> libtool version issue down in expat
>
> Sol10 on Intel or Sparc?
S10 Update 5 on Intel
apparently it is the use of bundled expat
checking Expat 1.95.x... no
checking old Debian-packaged expat... no
checking old FreeBSD-packaged expat... no
checking Expat 1.0/1.1... no
setting LDFLAGS to "-L/usr/local/lib"
adding "-I/usr/local/include" to CPPFLAGS
checking Expat 1.95.x in /usr/local... no
nulling LDFLAGS
removed "-I/usr/local/include" from CPPFLAGS
configuring package in xml/expat now
checking build system type... i386-pc-solaris2.10
checking host system type... i386-pc-solaris2.10
checking target system type... i386-pc-solaris2.10
/export/home/trawick/opensource/httpd-2.3.6/srclib/apr-util/xml/expat/configure:
line 3352: syntax error near unexpected token `lt_decl_varnames,'
/export/home/trawick/opensource/httpd-2.3.6/srclib/apr-util/xml/expat/configure:
line 3352: `lt_if_append_uniq(lt_decl_varnames, SED, , ,'
configure failed for xml/expat
configure failed for srclib/apr-util
$ ls -l srclib/apr-util/xml/expat/configure
-rwxr-xr-x 1 trawick other 430902 Jun 11 08:15
srclib/apr-util/xml/expat/configure
I should try "--with-expat=builtin" on a system where system expat is
normally used and see if I get the same issue.
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On Jun 16, 2010, at 8:31 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>> C'mon... any other votes? :)
>
> I'm working on it, but so far I can't get the two tarballs to build on
> Solaris 10 with "./configure --prefix=FOO", apparently due to some
> libtool version issue down in expat
Sol10 on Intel or Sparc?
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha
Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
On 16.06.2010 14:31, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Jim Jagielski<ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>> C'mon... any other votes? :)
>
> I'm working on it...
Me to. Running the test framework right now ...
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> C'mon... any other votes? :)
I'm working on it, but so far I can't get the two tarballs to build on
Solaris 10 with "./configure --prefix=FOO", apparently due to some
libtool version issue down in expat (running buildconf just moved
libtool symptoms from one place to another); yes, vague descriptions,
but no time to mess with it now.
I'm switching to another platform where I hope to be able to build and
kick the tires.
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
C'mon... any other votes? :)
On Jun 11, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.6-alpha are (will be) available
> at:
>
> <http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/>
>
> Your votes please;
>
> +/- 1
> [ ] Release httpd-2.3.6 as Alpha
>
> Vote closes at 15:00 UTC on Wednesday June 16 2010.
>
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha
Posted by Mario Brandt <jb...@gmail.com>.
non-binding
[x] Release httpd-2.3.6 as Alpha
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha
Posted by "Gregg L. Smith" <li...@glewis.com>.
non-binding Win32 XP/Vista VC6 VC9
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> +/- 1
> [+1] Release httpd-2.3.6 as Alpha
> Vote closes at 15:00 UTC on Wednesday June 16 2010.
APR 1.4.2
APU 1.3.9
APU 1.4.0-dev
Every module loads this time (lbmethods did not in 2.3.5 IIRC)
SSLCACertificateFile no longer errors for me
I'd +1 beta if that were an option and a freeze on the API.
Looks like cabin fever is going to bring the vote down to the wire with
less than 11 hours to go.
Gregg
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.6-alpha are (will be) available
> at:
>
> <http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/>
>
> Your votes please;
>
> +/- 1
[+1] Release httpd-2.3.6 as Alpha
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha
Posted by Stefan Fritsch <sf...@sfritsch.de>.
On Friday 11 June 2010, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> +/- 1
> [+1] Release httpd-2.3.6 as Alpha
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha
Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
On 11.06.2010 18:46, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.6-alpha are (will be) available
> at:
>
> <http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/>
>
> Your votes please;
>
> +/- 1
> [ X] Release httpd-2.3.6 as Alpha
I built it on Solaris 8, Solaris 10 (both Sparc, using gcc), SuSE Linux
Enterprise 10 (32 and 64 Bits) and RHEL 5 (64Bits).
For each platform build against released APR/APU 1.4.2/1.3.9, against
bundled and against APR trunk.
Each of those combinations built with shared and static modules as well
as default build. Module sets "few", "most", "all", "none" and default.
All builds with shared mpms "all".
All builds succeeded and contain the expected set of binaries and modules.
Due to time conjstraints I was only able to run the test framework for
Solaris 8 (bundled APR/APU, all modules, shared) with MPM prefork and
worker and for SLES 10, 32 Bit (bundled APR/APU, all modules, shared)
with MPMs event, worker and prefork. Runs were successful.
Thanks for RM'ing
Rainer
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
OK.... I kept the deadline open a bit and we have the following
votes:
+1: Jim Jagielski, Marlo Brandt (nb), Stefan Fritsch,
Gregg Smith (nb), Chris Darroch, Eric Covener,
Rainer Jung, Jeff Trawick, Dan Poirier.
Looks like we have sufficient binding votes that I feel
comfy releasing!
Will update site and away we go!
On Jun 11, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.6-alpha are (will be) available
> at:
>
> <http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/>
>
> Your votes please;
>
> +/- 1
> [ ] Release httpd-2.3.6 as Alpha
>
> Vote closes at 15:00 UTC on Wednesday June 16 2010.
>
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha
Posted by Dan Poirier <po...@pobox.com>.
+1: Non-binding and missed the deadline, but for what it's worth...
Downloads okay, md5 & sha checksums good.
Built on Mac OS 10.6.3 with CC='gcc -arch i386'
Test framework passes except for SSL, I think I would need
to track down a more recent OpenSSL than Mac OS 10.6.3 provides
to get the session renegotiation stuff to work.
Re: [FINAL] Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha
Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
Hi Jim,
On 21.06.2010 14:37, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Just a FYI:
>
> I've been trying to get this puppy released, but something
> is *seriously* hosed with the whole svn sync process since,
> even as of *today*, it looks like NO mirrors have the
> 2.3.6-alpha tarballs, even though they have been committed
> and placed in all the right places on minotaur...
>
> I've submitted a few infra JIRA tasks but no joy... If anyone
> knows the magic mojo required to force these tarballs to be
> mirrored, please let me know...
I checked just now, and I can see it on
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/
http://archive.apache.org/dist/httpd/
and several mirrors like e.g.
http://apache.autinity.de/httpd/
http://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/pub/Mirrors/ftp.apache.org/dist/httpd/
http://apache.mirror.iphh.net/httpd/
http://apache.mirror.clusters.cc/httpd/
ftp://mirror.netcologne.de/apache.org/httpd/
...
Actually going through just a few mirrors I couldn't find one that is
missing 2.3.6. Note that the mirros don't have the md5 and sha1 files,
only the tarballs and signature, but I guess that's intentional.
Maybe things just improved today.
Regards,
Rainer
Re: [FINAL] Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
Just a FYI:
I've been trying to get this puppy released, but something
is *seriously* hosed with the whole svn sync process since,
even as of *today*, it looks like NO mirrors have the
2.3.6-alpha tarballs, even though they have been committed
and placed in all the right places on minotaur...
I've submitted a few infra JIRA tasks but no joy... If anyone
knows the magic mojo required to force these tarballs to be
mirrored, please let me know...
On Jun 17, 2010, at 8:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> OK.... I kept the deadline open a bit and we have the following
> votes:
>
> +1: Jim Jagielski, Marlo Brandt (nb), Stefan Fritsch,
> Gregg Smith (nb), Chris Darroch, Eric Covener,
> Rainer Jung, Jeff Trawick, Dan Poirier (nb).
>
> Looks like we have sufficient binding votes that I feel
> comfy releasing!
>
> Will update site and away we go!
>
> On Jun 11, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.6-alpha are (will be) available
>> at:
>>
>> <http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/>
>>
>> Your votes please;
>>
>> +/- 1
>> [ ] Release httpd-2.3.6 as Alpha
>>
>> Vote closes at 15:00 UTC on Wednesday June 16 2010.
>>
>
[FINAL] Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com>.
OK.... I kept the deadline open a bit and we have the following
votes:
+1: Jim Jagielski, Marlo Brandt (nb), Stefan Fritsch,
Gregg Smith (nb), Chris Darroch, Eric Covener,
Rainer Jung, Jeff Trawick, Dan Poirier (nb).
Looks like we have sufficient binding votes that I feel
comfy releasing!
Will update site and away we go!
On Jun 11, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.6-alpha are (will be) available
> at:
>
> <http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/>
>
> Your votes please;
>
> +/- 1
> [ ] Release httpd-2.3.6 as Alpha
>
> Vote closes at 15:00 UTC on Wednesday June 16 2010.
>
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.6-alpha
Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
+1 to release as alpha.
AIX 6.1/32-bit/xlc passes test framework.
--
Eric Covener
covener@gmail.com