You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jena.apache.org by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> on 2017/02/01 16:15:33 UTC
[VOTE] Release vote : Apache Jena 3.2.0
Subject line needs to include [VOTE].
There is a dependency change for json-ld to version 0.9.0 (same license).
.... else looks good so far!
Andy
On 01/02/17 16:09, A. Soroka wrote:
> Hello, Jena-folks!
>
> Let's vote on a release of Jena 3.2.0.
>
> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. Three +1's from PMC members permit a release, but everyone is not just welcome but _needed_ to do really good full testing. If a non-committer turns up an issue, you can bet I will investigate fast.
>
> This is a distribution of Jena and also of Fuseki 1 and 2.
>
> Versions being released include: Jena @ 3.2.0 (RDF libraries, database gear, and utilities), Fuseki 1 @ 1.5.0 and Fuseki 2 @ 2.5.0 (SPARQL servers).
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1016/
>
> Proposed distributions:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/binaries/
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/
>
> Keys:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
>
> Git tag:
> jena-3.2.0-rc1
> 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;a=commit;h=4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c
>
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
> This vote will be open to the end of
>
> Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
>
> Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
>
> ajs6f (A. Soroka)
>
>
> Checking needed:
>
> \u2022 Does everything work on MS Windows?
> \u2022 Does everything work on OS X?
> \u2022 Is the GPG signature okay?
> \u2022 Is there a source archive?
> \u2022 Can the source archive really be built?
> \u2022 Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both source and binary artifacts)?
> \u2022 Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
> \u2022 Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release vote : Apache Jena 3.2.0
Posted by "A. Soroka" <aj...@virginia.edu>.
+1 (binding)
The release candidate itself was generated on a Mac, so that's a box checked.
---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia Library
> On Feb 2, 2017, at 1:29 PM, Aaron Coburn <ac...@amherst.edu> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Works on OS X
>
>> On Feb 2, 2017, at 7:02 AM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>>>
>>>> This vote will be open to the end of
>>>>
>>>> Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
>>>>
>>>> ajs6f (A. Soroka)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Checking needed:
>>>>
>>>> • Does everything work on MS Windows?
>>>> • Does everything work on OS X?
>>
>> Works on Linux.
>>
>>>> • Is the GPG signature okay?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>> And the integrity md5 and sha1 checksums.
>>
>>>> • Is there a source archive?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>>>> • Can the source archive really be built?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>>>> • Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both
>>>> source and binary artifacts)?
>>
>> I pick some at random and they look good.
>>
>> I checked jena-rdfconnection as it is new.
>>
>>>> • Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>>>> • Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>>
>> Yes
>
Re: [VOTE] Release vote : Apache Jena 3.2.0
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
Hi Aaron,
Thanks for testing!
Andy
On 02/02/17 18:29, Aaron Coburn wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Works on OS X
>
>> On Feb 2, 2017, at 7:02 AM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>>>
>>>> This vote will be open to the end of
>>>>
>>>> Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
>>>>
>>>> ajs6f (A. Soroka)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Checking needed:
>>>>
>>>> \u2022 Does everything work on MS Windows?
>>>> \u2022 Does everything work on OS X?
>>
>> Works on Linux.
>>
>>>> \u2022 Is the GPG signature okay?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>> And the integrity md5 and sha1 checksums.
>>
>>>> \u2022 Is there a source archive?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>>>> \u2022 Can the source archive really be built?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>>>> \u2022 Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both
>>>> source and binary artifacts)?
>>
>> I pick some at random and they look good.
>>
>> I checked jena-rdfconnection as it is new.
>>
>>>> \u2022 Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>>>> \u2022 Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>>
>> Yes
>
Re: [VOTE] Release vote : Apache Jena 3.2.0
Posted by Aaron Coburn <ac...@amherst.edu>.
+1 (non-binding)
Works on OS X
> On Feb 2, 2017, at 7:02 AM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>>
>>> This vote will be open to the end of
>>>
>>> Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
>>>
>>> Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
>>>
>>> ajs6f (A. Soroka)
>>>
>>>
>>> Checking needed:
>>>
>>> • Does everything work on MS Windows?
>>> • Does everything work on OS X?
>
> Works on Linux.
>
>>> • Is the GPG signature okay?
>
> Yes
>
> And the integrity md5 and sha1 checksums.
>
>>> • Is there a source archive?
>
> Yes
>
>>> • Can the source archive really be built?
>
> Yes
>
>>> • Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both
>>> source and binary artifacts)?
>
> I pick some at random and they look good.
>
> I checked jena-rdfconnection as it is new.
>
>>> • Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
>
> Yes
>
>>> • Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>
> Yes
Re: [VOTE] Release vote : Apache Jena 3.2.0
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>
>> This vote will be open to the end of
>>
>> Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
>>
>> Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
>>
>> ajs6f (A. Soroka)
>>
>>
>> Checking needed:
>>
>> \u2022 Does everything work on MS Windows?
>> \u2022 Does everything work on OS X?
Works on Linux.
>> \u2022 Is the GPG signature okay?
Yes
And the integrity md5 and sha1 checksums.
>> \u2022 Is there a source archive?
Yes
>> \u2022 Can the source archive really be built?
Yes
>> \u2022 Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both
>> source and binary artifacts)?
I pick some at random and they look good.
I checked jena-rdfconnection as it is new.
>> \u2022 Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
Yes
>> \u2022 Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
Yes