You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-user@logging.apache.org by Ceki Gülcü <cg...@qos.ch> on 2001/08/01 02:18:06 UTC
JSR47 vs. log4j (take two)
For the latest developments on the JSR47 front you might want to read:
http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/critique2.html
--
Ceki Gülcü - http://qos.ch
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: JSR47 vs. log4j (take two)
Posted by Yuji Kumasaka <ku...@mms.intec.co.jp>.
There is 2 typo.
> The way the two APIs name their componets may vary but otherwise their degree of resemblance is quite scary.
> The way the two APIs name their components may vary but otherwise their degree of resemblance is quite scary.
> My gratitude goes to Jason Hunter for arranging the appropriate commucation channel to Sun.
> My gratitude goes to Jason Hunter for arranging the appropriate communication channel to Sun.
On Wed, 01 Aug 2001 02:18:06 +0200
Ceki G|lc| <cg...@qos.ch> wrote:
> For the latest developments on the JSR47 front you might want to read:
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/critique2.html
--
Yuji Kumasaka <ku...@mms.intec.co.jp>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: JSR47 vs. log4j (take two)
Posted by Kent Yang <ya...@nosc.mil>.
I am encourage by the latest developments. However, I wonder why
Sun didn't just specify an interface and allow different logging backends
to be plug-in. That way developers can decide what implementation
they want to use. Sun did this with a lot of their APIs (Security, Sockets,
etc...) Can this be done? Is there some reason log4j can't be the engine
behind a specified interface? I am still a newbie with the log4j API (I
know
you can plug in different appenders) but I am no log4j expert and I
don't know enough about the innerds to know whether this is possible
or not.
Mabye someone else can comment?
Kent
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ceki Gülcü" <cg...@qos.ch>
To: <lo...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 5:18 PM
Subject: JSR47 vs. log4j (take two)
For the latest developments on the JSR47 front you might want to read:
http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/critique2.html
--
Ceki Gülcü - http://qos.ch
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@jakarta.apache.org