You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by "Ron Gavlin (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/07/23 14:53:00 UTC

[jira] Commented: (SM-1479) smx-saxon should support IN-ONLY MEP to eliminate pipeline requirement for in-only flow

    [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=44481#action_44481 ] 

Ron Gavlin commented on SM-1479:
--------------------------------

It appears to handle my straightforward use case, albeit in a not-so-intuitive fashion IMHO. In my use case, people are not thinking "proxy". They simply expect the xslt and xquery endpoints to support all MEPs. Since the ExchangeTarget is now already defined, would it not make sense to expose it for optional use on the xslt and xquery endpoints?

Should I also add a JIRA for an XQueryProxy?

> smx-saxon should support IN-ONLY MEP to eliminate pipeline requirement for in-only flow
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SM-1479
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1479
>             Project: ServiceMix
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: servicemix-saxon
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.1
>         Environment: smx-saxon should support IN-ONLY MEP to eliminate pipeline requirement for in-only flow. Furthermore, since the Xslt lightweight component supported an IN-ONLY MEP, it makes sense for smx-saxon to do likewise to ease migration to smx4.
>            Reporter: Ron Gavlin
>


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.