You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@jspwiki.apache.org by Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com> on 2008/01/12 14:45:47 UTC
POLL: JDK 1.5
Hi ho folks!
Over at the dev-list we've had a bit of discussion on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-121
Please let us know if moving to JDK 1.5 would give you any real
problems. Please respond to this list directly with +1, 0, -1, where
they mean the following things:
+1 : JDK 1.5 is not a problem, go ahead
0 : I don't care - my current system is 1.4 but I can upgrade
-1 : I am on 1.4 and cannot upgrade.
JSPWiki 2.6 will stay 1.4, but we're currently thinking whether 2.8
should already use 1.5. JSPWiki 3 is going to require JDK 5 in any
case, but there have been some noise in the dev community on moving
to JDK 5 already in 2.8, as well as some noises against it. So this
is an attempt to figure out where our userbase really is.
/Janne
Re: POLL: JDK 1.5
Posted by Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <ju...@gmail.com>.
0
regards,
JP
2008/1/13, Christoph Sauer <sa...@hs-heilbronn.de>:
>
> 0
>
> --Christoph
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Janne Jalkanen [mailto:Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com]
> Gesendet: Samstag, 12. Januar 2008 14:46
> An: jspwiki-user@incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: POLL: JDK 1.5
>
> Hi ho folks!
>
> Over at the dev-list we've had a bit of discussion on
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-121
>
> Please let us know if moving to JDK 1.5 would give you any real
> problems. Please respond to this list directly with +1, 0, -1, where
> they mean the following things:
>
> +1 : JDK 1.5 is not a problem, go ahead
> 0 : I don't care - my current system is 1.4 but I can upgrade
> -1 : I am on 1.4 and cannot upgrade.
>
> JSPWiki 2.6 will stay 1.4, but we're currently thinking whether 2.8
> should already use 1.5. JSPWiki 3 is going to require JDK 5 in any
> case, but there have been some noise in the dev community on moving
> to JDK 5 already in 2.8, as well as some noises against it. So this
> is an attempt to figure out where our userbase really is.
>
> /Janne
>
>
>
AW: POLL: JDK 1.5
Posted by Christoph Sauer <sa...@hs-heilbronn.de>.
0
--Christoph
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Janne Jalkanen [mailto:Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com]
Gesendet: Samstag, 12. Januar 2008 14:46
An: jspwiki-user@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: POLL: JDK 1.5
Hi ho folks!
Over at the dev-list we've had a bit of discussion on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-121
Please let us know if moving to JDK 1.5 would give you any real
problems. Please respond to this list directly with +1, 0, -1, where
they mean the following things:
+1 : JDK 1.5 is not a problem, go ahead
0 : I don't care - my current system is 1.4 but I can upgrade
-1 : I am on 1.4 and cannot upgrade.
JSPWiki 2.6 will stay 1.4, but we're currently thinking whether 2.8
should already use 1.5. JSPWiki 3 is going to require JDK 5 in any
case, but there have been some noise in the dev community on moving
to JDK 5 already in 2.8, as well as some noises against it. So this
is an attempt to figure out where our userbase really is.
/Janne
Re: POLL: JDK 1.5
Posted by Florian Holeczek <fl...@holeczek.de>.
+1
> Please let us know if moving to JDK 1.5 would give you any real
> problems. Please respond to this list directly with +1, 0, -1, where
> they mean the following things:
> +1 : JDK 1.5 is not a problem, go ahead
> 0 : I don't care - my current system is 1.4 but I can upgrade
> -1 : I am on 1.4 and cannot upgrade.
> JSPWiki 2.6 will stay 1.4, but we're currently thinking whether 2.8
> should already use 1.5. JSPWiki 3 is going to require JDK 5 in any
> case, but there have been some noise in the dev community on moving
> to JDK 5 already in 2.8, as well as some noises against it. So this
> is an attempt to figure out where our userbase really is.
Re: POLL: JDK 1.5
Posted by Thomas Engelschmidt <te...@zama.org>.
+1
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 15:45 +0200, Janne Jalkanen wrote:
> Hi ho folks!
>
> Over at the dev-list we've had a bit of discussion on
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-121
>
> Please let us know if moving to JDK 1.5 would give you any real
> problems. Please respond to this list directly with +1, 0, -1, where
> they mean the following things:
>
> +1 : JDK 1.5 is not a problem, go ahead
> 0 : I don't care - my current system is 1.4 but I can upgrade
> -1 : I am on 1.4 and cannot upgrade.
>
> JSPWiki 2.6 will stay 1.4, but we're currently thinking whether 2.8
> should already use 1.5. JSPWiki 3 is going to require JDK 5 in any
> case, but there have been some noise in the dev community on moving
> to JDK 5 already in 2.8, as well as some noises against it. So this
> is an attempt to figure out where our userbase really is.
>
> /Janne
Re: POLL: JDK 1.5
Posted by Foster Schucker <Fo...@Schucker.org>.
+1
>
Re: POLL: JDK 1.5
Posted by "Nicklas Ekstrand (JSPWiki)" <js...@ekstrand.org>.
+1
I'm using JDK 1.5 on all my installations.
BR,
Nicklas
Janne Jalkanen wrote:
> Hi ho folks!
>
> Over at the dev-list we've had a bit of discussion on
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-121
>
> Please let us know if moving to JDK 1.5 would give you any real
> problems. Please respond to this list directly with +1, 0, -1, where
> they mean the following things:
>
> +1 : JDK 1.5 is not a problem, go ahead
> 0 : I don't care - my current system is 1.4 but I can upgrade
> -1 : I am on 1.4 and cannot upgrade.
>
> JSPWiki 2.6 will stay 1.4, but we're currently thinking whether 2.8
> should already use 1.5. JSPWiki 3 is going to require JDK 5 in any
> case, but there have been some noise in the dev community on moving to
> JDK 5 already in 2.8, as well as some noises against it. So this is an
> attempt to figure out where our userbase really is.
>
> /Janne
RE: POLL: JDK 1.5
Posted by Joerg Meyer <jm...@pts-consulting.jp>.
+1
Both enterprise Wiki's and my private Wiki are on 1.5 and 1.6
respectively.
A note on backwards compatibility: run the old stuff in a virtual
machine, if that's too much hassle migrate the Wiki into its own box.
Gets rid of annoying problems like interference.
And at least on Linux boxes its perfectly fine to run multiple JDK's
parallel. If there is more than one application on JBoss/Tomcat or
whatever, Glassfish or an alternative webserver should solve the
dependencies.
Cheers,
Joerg
Re: POLL: JDK 1.5
Posted by Murray Altheim <mu...@altheim.com>.
+1
Have resolved issues with JDK 5 support (will be entirely JDK 5
compatible by the time in 2008 when it could be an issue for me).
This does not resolve the issue for local/rural libraries and
non-profit organizations, but I will not be able to provide
metrics on them so an argument here cannot be sustained.
Murray
...........................................................................
Murray Altheim <murray07 at altheim.com> === = =
http://www.altheim.com/murray/ = = ===
SGML Grease Monkey, Banjo Player, Wantanabe Zen Monk = = = =
Boundless wind and moon - the eye within eyes,
Inexhaustible heaven and earth - the light beyond light,
The willow dark, the flower bright - ten thousand houses,
Knock at any door - there's one who will respond.
-- The Blue Cliff Record
Re: POLL: JDK 1.5
Posted by 高建民 <da...@gmail.com>.
+1
-------- Original Message --------
> Hi ho folks!
>
> Over at the dev-list we've had a bit of discussion on
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-121
>
> Please let us know if moving to JDK 1.5 would give you any real
> problems. Please respond to this list directly with +1, 0, -1, where
> they mean the following things:
>
> +1 : JDK 1.5 is not a problem, go ahead
> 0 : I don't care - my current system is 1.4 but I can upgrade
> -1 : I am on 1.4 and cannot upgrade.
>
> JSPWiki 2.6 will stay 1.4, but we're currently thinking whether 2.8
> should already use 1.5. JSPWiki 3 is going to require JDK 5 in any
> case, but there have been some noise in the dev community on moving to
> JDK 5 already in 2.8, as well as some noises against it. So this is
> an attempt to figure out where our userbase really is.
>
> /Janne
>
Re: POLL: JDK 1.5
Posted by Andrew Jaquith <an...@mac.com>.
+1, naturally
On Jan 12, 2008, at 8:45 AM, Janne Jalkanen wrote:
> Hi ho folks!
>
> Over at the dev-list we've had a bit of discussion on
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-121
>
> Please let us know if moving to JDK 1.5 would give you any real
> problems. Please respond to this list directly with +1, 0, -1,
> where they mean the following things:
>
> +1 : JDK 1.5 is not a problem, go ahead
> 0 : I don't care - my current system is 1.4 but I can upgrade
> -1 : I am on 1.4 and cannot upgrade.
>
> JSPWiki 2.6 will stay 1.4, but we're currently thinking whether 2.8
> should already use 1.5. JSPWiki 3 is going to require JDK 5 in any
> case, but there have been some noise in the dev community on moving
> to JDK 5 already in 2.8, as well as some noises against it. So this
> is an attempt to figure out where our userbase really is.
>
> /Janne
Re: POLL: JDK 1.5
Posted by Fabian Haupt <fh...@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
+1
[I'd even go ahead +2: using 1.6 ;)
so far, all my jspwiki-setups run painlessly on java-6 with tomcat-6]
Janne Jalkanen wrote:
> Hi ho folks!
>
> Over at the dev-list we've had a bit of discussion on
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-121
>
> Please let us know if moving to JDK 1.5 would give you any real
> problems. Please respond to this list directly with +1, 0, -1, where
> they mean the following things:
>
> +1 : JDK 1.5 is not a problem, go ahead
> 0 : I don't care - my current system is 1.4 but I can upgrade
> -1 : I am on 1.4 and cannot upgrade.
>
> JSPWiki 2.6 will stay 1.4, but we're currently thinking whether 2.8
> should already use 1.5. JSPWiki 3 is going to require JDK 5 in any
> case, but there have been some noise in the dev community on moving to
> JDK 5 already in 2.8, as well as some noises against it. So this is an
> attempt to figure out where our userbase really is.
>
> /Janne
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkeI0uMACgkQtC//DIQj2V8H6QCfWM4uEofd4pWx2Ghj1HEvBAHO
La4AmgMs26GGEu5C0XWm4H4tYPAeYDxP
=zPm3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: POLL: JDK 1.5
Posted by Florian Hopf <ho...@synyx.de>.
+1
Janne Jalkanen schrieb:
> Hi ho folks!
>
> Over at the dev-list we've had a bit of discussion on
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-121
>
> Please let us know if moving to JDK 1.5 would give you any real
> problems. Please respond to this list directly with +1, 0, -1, where
> they mean the following things:
>
> +1 : JDK 1.5 is not a problem, go ahead
> 0 : I don't care - my current system is 1.4 but I can upgrade
> -1 : I am on 1.4 and cannot upgrade.
>
> JSPWiki 2.6 will stay 1.4, but we're currently thinking whether 2.8
> should already use 1.5. JSPWiki 3 is going to require JDK 5 in any
> case, but there have been some noise in the dev community on moving to
> JDK 5 already in 2.8, as well as some noises against it. So this is
> an attempt to figure out where our userbase really is.
>
> /Janne
>
Re: POLL: JDK 1.5
Posted by Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>.
+1
I'm running JSPWiki on JDK5 on Linux and JDK5 on z/OS.
The z/OS systems also still run JDK 1.3 and JDK 1.4. There's no operational
limitation in running multiple JDK's, maybe that is an option for some of
you ?
regards,
Harry
2008/1/12, Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com>:
>
> Hi ho folks!
>
> Over at the dev-list we've had a bit of discussion on
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-121
>
> Please let us know if moving to JDK 1.5 would give you any real
> problems. Please respond to this list directly with +1, 0, -1, where
> they mean the following things:
>
> +1 : JDK 1.5 is not a problem, go ahead
> 0 : I don't care - my current system is 1.4 but I can upgrade
> -1 : I am on 1.4 and cannot upgrade.
>
> JSPWiki 2.6 will stay 1.4, but we're currently thinking whether 2.8
> should already use 1.5. JSPWiki 3 is going to require JDK 5 in any
> case, but there have been some noise in the dev community on moving
> to JDK 5 already in 2.8, as well as some noises against it. So this
> is an attempt to figure out where our userbase really is.
>
> /Janne
>
--
met vriendelijke groet,
Harry Metske
Telnr. +31-548-512395
Mobile +31-6-51898081
Re: POLL: JDK 1.5
Posted by Frank Fischer <fr...@jcpsim.org>.
+1
Frank
> Hi ho folks!
>
> Over at the dev-list we've had a bit of discussion on
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-121
>
> Please let us know if moving to JDK 1.5 would give you any real
> problems. Please respond to this list directly with +1, 0, -1, where
> they mean the following things:
>
> +1 : JDK 1.5 is not a problem, go ahead
> 0 : I don't care - my current system is 1.4 but I can upgrade
> -1 : I am on 1.4 and cannot upgrade.
>
> JSPWiki 2.6 will stay 1.4, but we're currently thinking whether 2.8
> should already use 1.5. JSPWiki 3 is going to require JDK 5 in any
> case, but there have been some noise in the dev community on moving to
> JDK 5 already in 2.8, as well as some noises against it. So this is an
> attempt to figure out where our userbase really is.
>
> /Janne
>
Re: POLL: JDK 1.5
Posted by Dirk Frederickx <di...@gmail.com>.
0
Running on 1.4 JDK at enterprise on WLS, but upgrade is not planned.
Still need to upgrade of 1.2.6, so no big deal on short term.
dirk
On Jan 12, 2008 2:45 PM, Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com> wrote:
> Hi ho folks!
>
> Over at the dev-list we've had a bit of discussion on
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-121
>
> Please let us know if moving to JDK 1.5 would give you any real
> problems. Please respond to this list directly with +1, 0, -1, where
> they mean the following things:
>
> +1 : JDK 1.5 is not a problem, go ahead
> 0 : I don't care - my current system is 1.4 but I can upgrade
> -1 : I am on 1.4 and cannot upgrade.
>
> JSPWiki 2.6 will stay 1.4, but we're currently thinking whether 2.8
> should already use 1.5. JSPWiki 3 is going to require JDK 5 in any
> case, but there have been some noise in the dev community on moving
> to JDK 5 already in 2.8, as well as some noises against it. So this
> is an attempt to figure out where our userbase really is.
>
> /Janne
>
Re: POLL: JDK 1.5
Posted by David Au <de...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Jan 12, 2008 7:45 AM, Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com> wrote:
> Hi ho folks!
>
> Over at the dev-list we've had a bit of discussion on
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-121
>
> Please let us know if moving to JDK 1.5 would give you any real
> problems. Please respond to this list directly with +1, 0, -1, where
> they mean the following things:
>
> +1 : JDK 1.5 is not a problem, go ahead
> 0 : I don't care - my current system is 1.4 but I can upgrade
> -1 : I am on 1.4 and cannot upgrade.
>
> JSPWiki 2.6 will stay 1.4, but we're currently thinking whether 2.8
> should already use 1.5. JSPWiki 3 is going to require JDK 5 in any
> case, but there have been some noise in the dev community on moving
> to JDK 5 already in 2.8, as well as some noises against it. So this
> is an attempt to figure out where our userbase really is.
>
> /Janne
>
Re: Access to mailing list...
Posted by Olaf Kock <ok...@abstrakt.de>.
Janne Jalkanen schrieb:
>> Actually, most email Apache email lists are moderated
[...]
> Yes, they are, but as a moderator I personally don't remember all the
> correct email addresses of all the people who have subscribed to the
> mailing lists. I doubt anyone does.
I wish I had offered some pills or other money related things in that
mail, obviously it would have saved that account from becoming public. I
hope to remember that the next time I post from the wrong account :*)
Thanks for the answers - I won't take any more action but wait for my
deserved punishment. I believe I wouldn't get removed from all archives
anyway.
Cheers,
Olaf
Re: Access to mailing list... (was Re: POLL: JDK 1.5)
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
And for the record, the purpose of moderation is to keep spam from
showing up on the lists. It's not to restrict messages from specific
users. As a moderator, if I see a message that appears to be relevant
to the group, I'll allow it regardless of what email address it comes
from. I might look closer at a message that comes from a suspicious
address (like only allow that one message) but I'm certainly not
filtering messages to keep email addresses private.
Craig
On Jan 14, 2008, at 12:22 AM, Janne Jalkanen wrote:
>> Actually, most email Apache email lists are moderated, and emails
>> from
>> non-subscribed users do not go through to the list unless the
>> moderator
>> approves it. There is just too much spam around to allow non-
>> subscribed
>> posts. I'm surprised to hear that jspwiki lists do not have
>> moderation
>> configured.
>
> Yes, they are, but as a moderator I personally don't remember all
> the correct email addresses of all the people who have subscribed
> to the mailing lists. I doubt anyone does.
>
> /Janne
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: Access to mailing list... (was Re: POLL: JDK 1.5)
Posted by Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com>.
> Actually, most email Apache email lists are moderated, and emails from
> non-subscribed users do not go through to the list unless the
> moderator
> approves it. There is just too much spam around to allow non-
> subscribed
> posts. I'm surprised to hear that jspwiki lists do not have moderation
> configured.
Yes, they are, but as a moderator I personally don't remember all the
correct email addresses of all the people who have subscribed to the
mailing lists. I doubt anyone does.
/Janne
Re: Access to mailing list... (was Re: POLL: JDK 1.5)
Posted by Simon Kitching <sk...@ops.co.at>.
Janne Jalkanen schrieb:
>
> Olaf,
>
> try contacting infrastructure@apache.org for these kinds of removal
> requests. They should be able to help you out!
>
> However, I don't think that it's according to Apache customs to close
> mailing lists in such a way. People regularly Cc relevant developer
> mailing lists, from what I've seen.
Actually, most email Apache email lists are moderated, and emails from
non-subscribed users do not go through to the list unless the moderator
approves it. There is just too much spam around to allow non-subscribed
posts. I'm surprised to hear that jspwiki lists do not have moderation
configured.
Re: Access to mailing list... (was Re: POLL: JDK 1.5)
Posted by Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com>.
Olaf,
try contacting infrastructure@apache.org for these kinds of removal
requests. They should be able to help you out!
However, I don't think that it's according to Apache customs to close
mailing lists in such a way. People regularly Cc relevant developer
mailing lists, from what I've seen.
[I think this mailing list is monitored also by Nabble and some other
services, so you might be out of luck...]
/Janne
On 12 Jan 2008, at 22:46, Olaf Kock wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> just having accidentally posted using the wrong account - one that has
> not been pested by spam yet - I'd like to ask for opinion (or
> action) on
> limiting posts on this list to accounts that also receive mail
> posted here.
>
> I suppose, that my other account finally will be spammed too after
> appearing in any archives here, but others might benefit from such a
> limitation.
>
> I know that it's a weak protection against spam senders who might use
> sender addresses as they please, but it would protect people like me
> from their own stupidity...
>
> If somebody also has access to any archive I'd appreciate deleting my
> last mail regarding the JDK 1.5 poll, but I believe it's too late for
> that...
>
> Cheers + thanks,
> Olaf
>
>
Access to mailing list... (was Re: POLL: JDK 1.5)
Posted by Olaf Kock <ok...@abstrakt.de>.
Hi,
just having accidentally posted using the wrong account - one that has
not been pested by spam yet - I'd like to ask for opinion (or action) on
limiting posts on this list to accounts that also receive mail posted here.
I suppose, that my other account finally will be spammed too after
appearing in any archives here, but others might benefit from such a
limitation.
I know that it's a weak protection against spam senders who might use
sender addresses as they please, but it would protect people like me
from their own stupidity...
If somebody also has access to any archive I'd appreciate deleting my
last mail regarding the JDK 1.5 poll, but I believe it's too late for
that...
Cheers + thanks,
Olaf
Re: POLL: JDK 1.5
Posted by Olaf Kock <ol...@olafkock.de>.
+1
definitely, as 2.6 ist "just out" and paralell installation of multiple
jdks is not a problem, it should be no problem, even if anyone is
"still" on older versions. Enterprises desperately requiring the newest
version of JSPWiki (when it is out) should have no problems either
providing a separate environment (read server) for an application (just
declare the required jdk, possibly with tomcat, as part of the JSPWiki
installation) or install multiple jdks in parallell, which is also no
problem. I'm glad that JSPWiki does not require the latest and greatest
dotnet environment :)
For the same reason I'd also second Fabian Haupt about requiring Java6.
Somehow I'd like to increase the pace of Java upgrades in the field...
Cheers,
Olaf
Janne Jalkanen schrieb:
> +1 : JDK 1.5 is not a problem, go ahead
> 0 : I don't care - my current system is 1.4 but I can upgrade
> -1 : I am on 1.4 and cannot upgrade.
RE: POLL: JDK 1.5
Posted by "Gupta, Avinash" <Av...@Staples.com>.
+1
-----Original Message-----
From: Janne Jalkanen [mailto:Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com]
Sent: Sat 1/12/2008 8:45 AM
To: jspwiki-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: POLL: JDK 1.5
Hi ho folks!
Over at the dev-list we've had a bit of discussion on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-121
Please let us know if moving to JDK 1.5 would give you any real
problems. Please respond to this list directly with +1, 0, -1, where
they mean the following things:
+1 : JDK 1.5 is not a problem, go ahead
0 : I don't care - my current system is 1.4 but I can upgrade
-1 : I am on 1.4 and cannot upgrade.
JSPWiki 2.6 will stay 1.4, but we're currently thinking whether 2.8
should already use 1.5. JSPWiki 3 is going to require JDK 5 in any
case, but there have been some noise in the dev community on moving
to JDK 5 already in 2.8, as well as some noises against it. So this
is an attempt to figure out where our userbase really is.
/Janne
Re: POLL: JDK 1.5
Posted by Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>.
+1
Already on 1.5 in production and 1.6 for development. Given the length of
time (I'm guessing approximately 1 year based upon the 2.4 -> 2.6 release)
that it will take for the next version of JSPWiki to get to a stable
version, then issues of jumping directly to 1.6 should be mitigated, by
giving everyone plenty of time to prepare.
Dave
On Jan 12, 2008 2:37 PM, Terry Steichen <te...@net-frame.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Janne Jalkanen wrote:
> > Hi ho folks!
> >
> > Over at the dev-list we've had a bit of discussion on
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-121
> >
> > Please let us know if moving to JDK 1.5 would give you any real
> > problems. Please respond to this list directly with +1, 0, -1, where
> > they mean the following things:
> >
> > +1 : JDK 1.5 is not a problem, go ahead
> > 0 : I don't care - my current system is 1.4 but I can upgrade
> > -1 : I am on 1.4 and cannot upgrade.
> >
> > JSPWiki 2.6 will stay 1.4, but we're currently thinking whether 2.8
> > should already use 1.5. JSPWiki 3 is going to require JDK 5 in any
> > case, but there have been some noise in the dev community on moving to
> > JDK 5 already in 2.8, as well as some noises against it. So this is
> > an attempt to figure out where our userbase really is.
> >
> > /Janne
> >
>
--
Dave Wolf
H: 303-377-9537
M: 303-956-9106
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter."
--Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
Re: POLL: JDK 1.5
Posted by Terry Steichen <te...@net-frame.com>.
+1
Janne Jalkanen wrote:
> Hi ho folks!
>
> Over at the dev-list we've had a bit of discussion on
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-121
>
> Please let us know if moving to JDK 1.5 would give you any real
> problems. Please respond to this list directly with +1, 0, -1, where
> they mean the following things:
>
> +1 : JDK 1.5 is not a problem, go ahead
> 0 : I don't care - my current system is 1.4 but I can upgrade
> -1 : I am on 1.4 and cannot upgrade.
>
> JSPWiki 2.6 will stay 1.4, but we're currently thinking whether 2.8
> should already use 1.5. JSPWiki 3 is going to require JDK 5 in any
> case, but there have been some noise in the dev community on moving to
> JDK 5 already in 2.8, as well as some noises against it. So this is
> an attempt to figure out where our userbase really is.
>
> /Janne
>
Re: POLL: JDK 1.5
Posted by Ethan Larson <et...@ethanlarson.net>.
+1
I'm actually using Java 1.6 - the benefit of working on my own small
project, so upgrade away!
Janne Jalkanen wrote:
> Hi ho folks!
>
> Over at the dev-list we've had a bit of discussion on
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-121
>
> Please let us know if moving to JDK 1.5 would give you any real
> problems. Please respond to this list directly with +1, 0, -1, where
> they mean the following things:
>
> +1 : JDK 1.5 is not a problem, go ahead
> 0 : I don't care - my current system is 1.4 but I can upgrade
> -1 : I am on 1.4 and cannot upgrade.
>
> JSPWiki 2.6 will stay 1.4, but we're currently thinking whether 2.8
> should already use 1.5. JSPWiki 3 is going to require JDK 5 in any
> case, but there have been some noise in the dev community on moving to
> JDK 5 already in 2.8, as well as some noises against it. So this is
> an attempt to figure out where our userbase really is.
>
> /Janne
Re: POLL: JDK 1.5
Posted by Ivan Martinez <iv...@gmail.com>.
+1
Re: POLL: JDK 1.5
Posted by Jim White <ji...@pagesmiths.com>.
For the reasons Murray has detailed (which has thankfully releived me
from having to make them here as I have elsewhere), I vote:
-1
But I fully understand the desire to move to using Java 5 features in
JSPWiki code. I recommend investigating Retroweaver as a means to move
the source level ahead while preserving JDK 1.4 compatiblity for
deployment purposes.
http://retroweaver.sourceforge.net/
Jim
Janne Jalkanen wrote:
> Hi ho folks!
>
> Over at the dev-list we've had a bit of discussion on
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-121
>
> Please let us know if moving to JDK 1.5 would give you any real
> problems. Please respond to this list directly with +1, 0, -1, where
> they mean the following things:
>
> +1 : JDK 1.5 is not a problem, go ahead
> 0 : I don't care - my current system is 1.4 but I can upgrade
> -1 : I am on 1.4 and cannot upgrade.
>
> JSPWiki 2.6 will stay 1.4, but we're currently thinking whether 2.8
> should already use 1.5. JSPWiki 3 is going to require JDK 5 in any
> case, but there have been some noise in the dev community on moving to
> JDK 5 already in 2.8, as well as some noises against it. So this is an
> attempt to figure out where our userbase really is.
>
> /Janne
>