You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org> on 2008/01/30 15:21:06 UTC
[VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/
According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Rémy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 17:57 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > Rainer Jung wrote:
> >> Remy Maucherat schrieb:
> >>> The candidates binaries are available here:
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/
> >>>
> >>> According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is:
> >>> [ ] Broken
> >>> [ ] Alpha
> >>> [ ] Beta
> >>> [X] Stable
> >>>
> >>> Rémy
> >>
> >> One small note: there is a new Thumbs.db file in
> >> server/webapps/host-manager/images which doesn't come from svn and
> >> wasn't there in 6.0.14. I guess it was auto-generated by some of those
> >> smart service on the build system and we don't really want it in
> >> future releases.
> >
> > That's caused by me building on Windows [XP] for the Windows installer.
> > I can redo the binaries before putting them in the wild, but obviously
> > it shouldn't be a huge issue.
> >
> > Rémy
>
> I would agree with keeping the files we used for testing. No need for
> repackaging, because the issue is so small and there's always a little
> risk in repackaging. So I would suggest to simply proceed with the files
> we tested (and maybe have a short look at the contents of the Thumbs.db,
> so we know we don't deliver something compromising ... :) )
Ok, I think I will keep the current binaries.
Rémy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Content of Thumbs.db files (was RE: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16)
Posted by Christophe Pierret <cp...@sparus-software.com>.
I think that it is safe to ship the thumbs.db inside the archives.
Thumbs.db is the image thumbnail database generated by Windows Explorer when you display images in Explorer.
So it will only deliver information about the images in the directory where it sits.
You can use http://www.dmthumbs.com/ to have a look inside the file to verify it ...
Best regards,
Christophe
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.jung@kippdata.de]
Envoyé : mardi 5 février 2008 17:57
À : Tomcat Developers List
Objet : Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Rainer Jung wrote:
>> Remy Maucherat schrieb:
>>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/
>>>
>>> According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is:
>>> [ ] Broken
>>> [ ] Alpha
>>> [ ] Beta
>>> [X] Stable
>>>
>>> Rémy
>>
>> One small note: there is a new Thumbs.db file in
>> server/webapps/host-manager/images which doesn't come from svn and
>> wasn't there in 6.0.14. I guess it was auto-generated by some of those
>> smart service on the build system and we don't really want it in
>> future releases.
>
> That's caused by me building on Windows [XP] for the Windows installer.
> I can redo the binaries before putting them in the wild, but obviously
> it shouldn't be a huge issue.
>
> Rémy
I would agree with keeping the files we used for testing. No need for
repackaging, because the issue is so small and there's always a little
risk in repackaging. So I would suggest to simply proceed with the files
we tested (and maybe have a short look at the contents of the Thumbs.db,
so we know we don't deliver something compromising ... :) )
Regards,
Rainer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Posted by Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <de...@hanik.com>.
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Feb 5, 2008 6:56 PM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Rainer Jung wrote:
>>
>>> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>>>
>>>> Rainer Jung wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Remy Maucherat schrieb:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is:
>>>>>> [ ] Broken
>>>>>> [ ] Alpha
>>>>>> [ ] Beta
>>>>>> [X] Stable
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rémy
>>>>>>
>>>>> One small note: there is a new Thumbs.db file in
>>>>> server/webapps/host-manager/images which doesn't come from svn and
>>>>> wasn't there in 6.0.14. I guess it was auto-generated by some of
>>>>> those smart service on the build system and we don't really want it
>>>>> in future releases.
>>>>>
>>>> That's caused by me building on Windows [XP] for the Windows
>>>> installer. I can redo the binaries before putting them in the wild,
>>>> but obviously it shouldn't be a huge issue.
>>>>
>>>> Rémy
>>>>
>>> I would agree with keeping the files we used for testing. No need for
>>> repackaging, ...
>>>
>> <snip />
>>
>> As far as our voting goes, the only thing that matters is the source
>> release.
>>
>
> This IMO is a distortion of ASF policy - which I believe is that
> "every release needs the source - the binaries are a nice convenience"
> - but you've extrapolated that into something different. If those
> "convenience binaries" are provided as part of an official release
> then they do need PMC approval:
>
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what
>
> Niall
>
>
I'd say we take the release discussion away from the release, just
release it with the file, as is, and in the next release, we take the
file out.
if we wanna debate ASF ways, lets do that, but not hinder this release.
Filip
>> We are free to re-package the binaries as much, or as little, as
>> we wish providing we don't modify the build script since that would be
>> modifying the source.
>>
>
>
>
>> Personally, I would repackage it but I am not that bothered about it. I am
>> happy which ever way Remy chooses to go on this.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
On Feb 5, 2008 6:56 PM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Rainer Jung wrote:
> > Remy Maucherat wrote:
> >> Rainer Jung wrote:
> >>> Remy Maucherat schrieb:
> >>>> The candidates binaries are available here:
> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/
> >>>>
> >>>> According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is:
> >>>> [ ] Broken
> >>>> [ ] Alpha
> >>>> [ ] Beta
> >>>> [X] Stable
> >>>>
> >>>> Rémy
> >>>
> >>> One small note: there is a new Thumbs.db file in
> >>> server/webapps/host-manager/images which doesn't come from svn and
> >>> wasn't there in 6.0.14. I guess it was auto-generated by some of
> >>> those smart service on the build system and we don't really want it
> >>> in future releases.
> >>
> >> That's caused by me building on Windows [XP] for the Windows
> >> installer. I can redo the binaries before putting them in the wild,
> >> but obviously it shouldn't be a huge issue.
> >>
> >> Rémy
> >
> > I would agree with keeping the files we used for testing. No need for
> > repackaging, ...
> <snip />
>
> As far as our voting goes, the only thing that matters is the source
> release.
This IMO is a distortion of ASF policy - which I believe is that
"every release needs the source - the binaries are a nice convenience"
- but you've extrapolated that into something different. If those
"convenience binaries" are provided as part of an official release
then they do need PMC approval:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what
Niall
> We are free to re-package the binaries as much, or as little, as
> we wish providing we don't modify the build script since that would be
> modifying the source.
> Personally, I would repackage it but I am not that bothered about it. I am
> happy which ever way Remy chooses to go on this.
>
> Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
Rainer Jung wrote:
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>> Rainer Jung wrote:
>>> Remy Maucherat schrieb:
>>>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/
>>>>
>>>> According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is:
>>>> [ ] Broken
>>>> [ ] Alpha
>>>> [ ] Beta
>>>> [X] Stable
>>>>
>>>> Rémy
>>>
>>> One small note: there is a new Thumbs.db file in
>>> server/webapps/host-manager/images which doesn't come from svn and
>>> wasn't there in 6.0.14. I guess it was auto-generated by some of
>>> those smart service on the build system and we don't really want it
>>> in future releases.
>>
>> That's caused by me building on Windows [XP] for the Windows
>> installer. I can redo the binaries before putting them in the wild,
>> but obviously it shouldn't be a huge issue.
>>
>> Rémy
>
> I would agree with keeping the files we used for testing. No need for
> repackaging, ...
<snip />
As far as our voting goes, the only thing that matters is the source
release. We are free to re-package the binaries as much, or as little, as
we wish providing we don't modify the build script since that would be
modifying the source.
Personally, I would repackage it but I am not that bothered about it. I am
happy which ever way Remy chooses to go on this.
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Rainer Jung wrote:
>> Remy Maucherat schrieb:
>>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/
>>>
>>> According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is:
>>> [ ] Broken
>>> [ ] Alpha
>>> [ ] Beta
>>> [X] Stable
>>>
>>> Rémy
>>
>> One small note: there is a new Thumbs.db file in
>> server/webapps/host-manager/images which doesn't come from svn and
>> wasn't there in 6.0.14. I guess it was auto-generated by some of those
>> smart service on the build system and we don't really want it in
>> future releases.
>
> That's caused by me building on Windows [XP] for the Windows installer.
> I can redo the binaries before putting them in the wild, but obviously
> it shouldn't be a huge issue.
>
> Rémy
I would agree with keeping the files we used for testing. No need for
repackaging, because the issue is so small and there's always a little
risk in repackaging. So I would suggest to simply proceed with the files
we tested (and maybe have a short look at the contents of the Thumbs.db,
so we know we don't deliver something compromising ... :) )
Regards,
Rainer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Posted by Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <de...@hanik.com>.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Rainer Jung wrote:
>> Remy Maucherat schrieb:
>>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/
>>>
>>> According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is:
>>> [ ] Broken
>>> [ ] Alpha
>>> [ ] Beta
>>> [X] Stable
>>>
>>> Rémy
>>
>> One small note: there is a new Thumbs.db file in
>> server/webapps/host-manager/images which doesn't come from svn and
>> wasn't there in 6.0.14. I guess it was auto-generated by some of
>> those smart service on the build system and we don't really want it
>> in future releases.
>
> That's caused by me building on Windows [XP] for the Windows
> installer. I can redo the binaries before putting them in the wild,
> but obviously it shouldn't be a huge issue.
no need, I'd just release the darn thing. the file doesn't contain
anything except for a thumb cache of the host manager files. no one cares
Filip
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>.
Rainer Jung wrote:
> Remy Maucherat schrieb:
>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/
>>
>> According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is:
>> [ ] Broken
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [ ] Beta
>> [X] Stable
>>
>> Rémy
>
> One small note: there is a new Thumbs.db file in
> server/webapps/host-manager/images which doesn't come from svn and
> wasn't there in 6.0.14. I guess it was auto-generated by some of those
> smart service on the build system and we don't really want it in future
> releases.
That's caused by me building on Windows [XP] for the Windows installer.
I can redo the binaries before putting them in the wild, but obviously
it shouldn't be a huge issue.
Rémy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
Remy Maucherat schrieb:
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/
>
> According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is:
> [ ] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X] Stable
>
> Rémy
One small note: there is a new Thumbs.db file in
server/webapps/host-manager/images which doesn't come from svn and
wasn't there in 6.0.14. I guess it was auto-generated by some of those
smart service on the build system and we don't really want it in future
releases.
Regards,
Rainer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>.
On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 00:14 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Can't vote before Sunday evening, but no need to wait for that.
I'll wait at least until monday.
Rémy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
Can't vote before Sunday evening, but no need to wait for that.
Rainer
Remy Maucherat schrieb:
> Ok, the voting seems wrapped up at this point. Any second thoughts ?
>
> Rémy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>.
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 15:21 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/
>
> According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is:
> [ ] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] Stable
Ok, the voting seems wrapped up at this point. Any second thoughts ?
Rémy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Posted by Peter Rossbach <pr...@objektpark.de>.
Am 30.01.2008 um 15:21 schrieb Remy Maucherat:
> According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is:
> [ ] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ x] Stable
Peter
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Posted by Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <de...@hanik.com>.
Mark Thomas wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/
>>>
>>> According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is:
>>> [ ] Broken
>>> [ ] Alpha
>>> [ ] Beta
>>> [X] Stable
>>
>> I currently see a small number TCK failures. As this is the first
>> time I have run the TCK it may well be my configuration that is
>> wrong. I am looking into the errors at the moment.
>
> It is amazing what adding
> -Dorg.apache.catalina.STRICT_SERVLET_COMPLIANCE=true
> can do ;)
>
> The tests all pass bar the signature one that I can't get the class to
> compile for. Any hints or tips appreciated.
>
> I don't have any heavy usage of 6.0.x at the moment but I couldn't
> break anything just poking around with the app I do have running at home.
I haven't got the signature test to pass, but I haven't invested too
much time in it, since its not functionality
Filip
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
Mark Thomas wrote:
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/
>>
>> According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is:
>> [ ] Broken
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [ ] Beta
>> [X] Stable
>
> I currently see a small number TCK failures. As this is the first time I
> have run the TCK it may well be my configuration that is wrong. I am
> looking into the errors at the moment.
It is amazing what adding
-Dorg.apache.catalina.STRICT_SERVLET_COMPLIANCE=true
can do ;)
The tests all pass bar the signature one that I can't get the class to
compile for. Any hints or tips appreciated.
I don't have any heavy usage of 6.0.x at the moment but I couldn't break
anything just poking around with the app I do have running at home.
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/
>
> According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is:
> [ ] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] Stable
I currently see a small number TCK failures. As this is the first time I
have run the TCK it may well be my configuration that is wrong. I am
looking into the errors at the moment.
Out of curiosity, has anyone got the signature tests working? I seem to be
missing some required classes.
Cheers,
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Posted by Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org>.
> According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is:
> [ ] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [x] Stable
>
Regards,
Mladen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Posted by Yoav Shapira <yo...@apache.org>.
> According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is:
> [ ] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ X ] Stable
Yoav
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Posted by Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <de...@hanik.com>.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/
>
> According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is:
> [ ] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X] Stable
>
> Rémy
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.16
Posted by Henri Gomez <he...@gmail.com>.
According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org