You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Michal Hlavac (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/03/24 11:18:47 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-5356) more generic
lucene-morfologik integration
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13944886#comment-13944886 ]
Michal Hlavac edited comment on LUCENE-5356 at 3/24/14 10:17 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Ahmet,
I think this is not right way how to ask quetions like this. Please use lucene's user mailing list. Thanks
was (Author: hlavki):
Hi Ahmet,
I think this is not good way how to ask quetions like this. Please use lucene's user mailing list. Thanks
> more generic lucene-morfologik integration
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-5356
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5356
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: modules/analysis
> Affects Versions: 4.6
> Reporter: Michal Hlavac
> Assignee: Dawid Weiss
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: newbie, patch
> Fix For: 4.8, 5.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-5356.patch, LUCENE-5356.patch, LUCENE-5356.patch
>
>
> I have little proposal for morfologik lucene module. Current module is tightly coupled with polish DICTIONARY enumeration.
> But other people (like me) can build own dictionaries to FSA and use it with lucene.
> You can find proposal in attachment and also example usage in analyzer (SlovakLemmaAnalyzer).
> It uses dictionary property as String resource from classpath, not enumeration.
> One change is, that dictionary variable must be set in MofologikFilterFactory (no default value).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org