You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@toree.apache.org by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> on 2016/12/02 00:21:20 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3
I would check with Gino if he is ok with somebody else continuing this, but
if you know he is way or something, then it should be ok for you to
continue,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Chip Senkbeil <ch...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Does Gino need to be the one to do this? Or can I get it started by closing
> the vote thread and opening an approval request in general for the release?
>
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 5:30 PM Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I haven't seen an e-mail closing the release vote, and neither the IPMC
> > vote thread started. Are we still waiting for something specific here ?
> > Anything one of the mentors can help ?
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > First you need to close the vote. Then the release needs to be approved
> > in
> > > general, check the archives there for an example of the vote thread, as
> > you
> > > need to add link to vote thread, cote result....
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:03 PM Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkbeil@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> So, with three +1s, what do we need to do? Are there still things to
> > >> address? Does this need to go to general Apache? This has been open
> for
> > >> awhile.
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:31 PM Gino Bustelo <gi...@bustelos.com>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > +1
> > >> >
> > >> > We need to get this thing moving.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 5:17 PM Hitesh Shah <hi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Sorry for the delay in reviewing the bits.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Comments:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > KEYS file still missing.
> > >> > > Did signature/checksum checks for binary, source and pip bundles.
> > >> > > For the binary release, the assembly jar makes it a bit tough to
> > >> validate
> > >> > > all dependencies. Not completed this fully though. Would be good
> if
> > >> other
> > >> > > folks who are reviewing can help.
> > >> > > For source release, there are a bunch of files without valid
> > headers.
> > >> > Also
> > >> > > some files like .example-image, etc are part of the release
> tarball
> > >> when
> > >> > > they should not be. ( used `find . -type f | xargs grep -L
> "Licensed
> > >> to
> > >> > the
> > >> > > Apache Software”` to find the ones in question). These should be
> > fixed
> > >> > > before the next release.
> > >> > > The License/Notice file for the source bundle needs to be fixed.
> > They
> > >> > > contain entries for items that are not part of the source bundle.
> > >> > > PKG-INFO for the pip package may need to be fixed. The license for
> > it
> > >> is
> > >> > > not only ALv2 but a combination of all the other bits bundled into
> > the
> > >> > > assembly jar.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > License/Notice files:
> > >> > > There are a bunch of copyright lines in the LICENSE file without
> any
> > >> > > indication of why they are there. At the moment, it seems to
> > indicate
> > >> > they
> > >> > > are for all of the toree codebase.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > +0 for this release.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I think that there has been enough work done on this initial
> release
> > >> that
> > >> > > it will be useful to get some more eyes from the larger Incubator
> > >> group
> > >> > to
> > >> > > provide more useful feedback.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Please note that this vote does need atleast 3 PPMC +1s to pass.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > thanks
> > >> > > — Hitesh
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > On Oct 27, 2016, at 7:34 AM, Gino Bustelo <gi...@bustelos.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as
> > >> > > > Apache Toree version 0.1.0. Pay special attention to the LICENSE
> > and
> > >> > > > NOTICE files since this is our first release.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > The tag to be voted on is v0.1.0-rc3
> > >> > > > (5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d)
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > *
> > >> > >
> > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/
> > >> 5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
> > >> > > > <
> > >> > >
> > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/
> > >> 5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
> > >> > > >*
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc.
> can
> > >> be
> > >> > > found at:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > *
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc3/
> > >> > > > <
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc3/
> > >> >*
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority
> of
> > >> at
> > >> > > least
> > >> > > > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Toree 0.1.0
> > >> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > > --
> > > Sent from my Mobile device
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3
Posted by Chip Senkbeil <ch...@gmail.com>.
Closing this vote. Going to start a vote for an RC4 once I get all of the
artifacts in place on staging and dist.
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:59 AM Gino Bustelo <gi...@bustelos.com> wrote:
> Go for it Chip.
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:21 PM Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I would check with Gino if he is ok with somebody else continuing this,
> but
> > if you know he is way or something, then it should be ok for you to
> > continue,
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Chip Senkbeil <ch...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Does Gino need to be the one to do this? Or can I get it started by
> > closing
> > > the vote thread and opening an approval request in general for the
> > release?
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 5:30 PM Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I haven't seen an e-mail closing the release vote, and neither the
> IPMC
> > > > vote thread started. Are we still waiting for something specific
> here ?
> > > > Anything one of the mentors can help ?
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Luciano Resende <
> luckbr1975@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > First you need to close the vote. Then the release needs to be
> > approved
> > > > in
> > > > > general, check the archives there for an example of the vote
> thread,
> > as
> > > > you
> > > > > need to add link to vote thread, cote result....
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:03 PM Chip Senkbeil <
> > chip.senkbeil@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> So, with three +1s, what do we need to do? Are there still things
> to
> > > > >> address? Does this need to go to general Apache? This has been
> open
> > > for
> > > > >> awhile.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:31 PM Gino Bustelo <gi...@bustelos.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > +1
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > We need to get this thing moving.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 5:17 PM Hitesh Shah <hi...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > Sorry for the delay in reviewing the bits.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Comments:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > KEYS file still missing.
> > > > >> > > Did signature/checksum checks for binary, source and pip
> > bundles.
> > > > >> > > For the binary release, the assembly jar makes it a bit tough
> to
> > > > >> validate
> > > > >> > > all dependencies. Not completed this fully though. Would be
> good
> > > if
> > > > >> other
> > > > >> > > folks who are reviewing can help.
> > > > >> > > For source release, there are a bunch of files without valid
> > > > headers.
> > > > >> > Also
> > > > >> > > some files like .example-image, etc are part of the release
> > > tarball
> > > > >> when
> > > > >> > > they should not be. ( used `find . -type f | xargs grep -L
> > > "Licensed
> > > > >> to
> > > > >> > the
> > > > >> > > Apache Software”` to find the ones in question). These should
> be
> > > > fixed
> > > > >> > > before the next release.
> > > > >> > > The License/Notice file for the source bundle needs to be
> fixed.
> > > > They
> > > > >> > > contain entries for items that are not part of the source
> > bundle.
> > > > >> > > PKG-INFO for the pip package may need to be fixed. The license
> > for
> > > > it
> > > > >> is
> > > > >> > > not only ALv2 but a combination of all the other bits bundled
> > into
> > > > the
> > > > >> > > assembly jar.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > License/Notice files:
> > > > >> > > There are a bunch of copyright lines in the LICENSE file
> without
> > > any
> > > > >> > > indication of why they are there. At the moment, it seems to
> > > > indicate
> > > > >> > they
> > > > >> > > are for all of the toree codebase.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > +0 for this release.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > I think that there has been enough work done on this initial
> > > release
> > > > >> that
> > > > >> > > it will be useful to get some more eyes from the larger
> > Incubator
> > > > >> group
> > > > >> > to
> > > > >> > > provide more useful feedback.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Please note that this vote does need atleast 3 PPMC +1s to
> pass.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > thanks
> > > > >> > > — Hitesh
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > On Oct 27, 2016, at 7:34 AM, Gino Bustelo <
> gino@bustelos.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Please vote to approve the release of the following
> candidate
> > as
> > > > >> > > > Apache Toree version 0.1.0. Pay special attention to the
> > LICENSE
> > > > and
> > > > >> > > > NOTICE files since this is our first release.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > The tag to be voted on is v0.1.0-rc3
> > > > >> > > > (5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d)
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > *
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/
> > > > >> 5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
> > > > >> > > > <
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/
> > > > >> 5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
> > > > >> > > >*
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests,
> etc.
> > > can
> > > > >> be
> > > > >> > > found at:
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > *
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc3/
> > > > >> > > > <
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc3/
> > > > >> >*
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a
> > majority
> > > of
> > > > >> at
> > > > >> > > least
> > > > >> > > > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Toree 0.1.0
> > > > >> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > > --
> > > > > Sent from my Mobile device
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3
Posted by Gino Bustelo <gi...@bustelos.com>.
Go for it Chip.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:21 PM Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would check with Gino if he is ok with somebody else continuing this, but
> if you know he is way or something, then it should be ok for you to
> continue,
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Chip Senkbeil <ch...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Does Gino need to be the one to do this? Or can I get it started by
> closing
> > the vote thread and opening an approval request in general for the
> release?
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 5:30 PM Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I haven't seen an e-mail closing the release vote, and neither the IPMC
> > > vote thread started. Are we still waiting for something specific here ?
> > > Anything one of the mentors can help ?
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > First you need to close the vote. Then the release needs to be
> approved
> > > in
> > > > general, check the archives there for an example of the vote thread,
> as
> > > you
> > > > need to add link to vote thread, cote result....
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:03 PM Chip Senkbeil <
> chip.senkbeil@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> So, with three +1s, what do we need to do? Are there still things to
> > > >> address? Does this need to go to general Apache? This has been open
> > for
> > > >> awhile.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:31 PM Gino Bustelo <gi...@bustelos.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > +1
> > > >> >
> > > >> > We need to get this thing moving.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 5:17 PM Hitesh Shah <hi...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Sorry for the delay in reviewing the bits.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Comments:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > KEYS file still missing.
> > > >> > > Did signature/checksum checks for binary, source and pip
> bundles.
> > > >> > > For the binary release, the assembly jar makes it a bit tough to
> > > >> validate
> > > >> > > all dependencies. Not completed this fully though. Would be good
> > if
> > > >> other
> > > >> > > folks who are reviewing can help.
> > > >> > > For source release, there are a bunch of files without valid
> > > headers.
> > > >> > Also
> > > >> > > some files like .example-image, etc are part of the release
> > tarball
> > > >> when
> > > >> > > they should not be. ( used `find . -type f | xargs grep -L
> > "Licensed
> > > >> to
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > > Apache Software”` to find the ones in question). These should be
> > > fixed
> > > >> > > before the next release.
> > > >> > > The License/Notice file for the source bundle needs to be fixed.
> > > They
> > > >> > > contain entries for items that are not part of the source
> bundle.
> > > >> > > PKG-INFO for the pip package may need to be fixed. The license
> for
> > > it
> > > >> is
> > > >> > > not only ALv2 but a combination of all the other bits bundled
> into
> > > the
> > > >> > > assembly jar.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > License/Notice files:
> > > >> > > There are a bunch of copyright lines in the LICENSE file without
> > any
> > > >> > > indication of why they are there. At the moment, it seems to
> > > indicate
> > > >> > they
> > > >> > > are for all of the toree codebase.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > +0 for this release.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > I think that there has been enough work done on this initial
> > release
> > > >> that
> > > >> > > it will be useful to get some more eyes from the larger
> Incubator
> > > >> group
> > > >> > to
> > > >> > > provide more useful feedback.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Please note that this vote does need atleast 3 PPMC +1s to pass.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > thanks
> > > >> > > — Hitesh
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > On Oct 27, 2016, at 7:34 AM, Gino Bustelo <gi...@bustelos.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate
> as
> > > >> > > > Apache Toree version 0.1.0. Pay special attention to the
> LICENSE
> > > and
> > > >> > > > NOTICE files since this is our first release.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > The tag to be voted on is v0.1.0-rc3
> > > >> > > > (5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d)
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > *
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/
> > > >> 5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
> > > >> > > > <
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/
> > > >> 5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d
> > > >> > > >*
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc.
> > can
> > > >> be
> > > >> > > found at:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > *
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc3/
> > > >> > > > <
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc3/
> > > >> >*
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a
> majority
> > of
> > > >> at
> > > >> > > least
> > > >> > > > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Toree 0.1.0
> > > >> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > > --
> > > > Sent from my Mobile device
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Luciano Resende
> > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>