You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cassandra.apache.org by Berenguer Blasi <be...@gmail.com> on 2022/10/03 05:27:56 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1-beta1
+1
On 30/9/22 16:20, Brandon Williams wrote:
> I'm +1 under these conditions as well.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Brandon
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 3:34 PM Mick Semb Wever <mc...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding +1s and no -1's.
>>
>>
>> So long as the ongoing 'release criteria' thread permits, I'm +1
>> (I won't close the vote until that thread summarises, up to you Josh when.)
>>
>> I'm ok with waivers on the two new flakies 17927 and 17928, so long as they block the next (beta or rc) release. Both appear to be only test related.
>>
>> Checked
>> - signing correct
>> - checksums are correct
>> - source artefact builds
>> - binary artefact runs
>> - debian package runs
>> - redhat package runs
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1-beta1
Posted by Caleb Rackliffe <ca...@gmail.com>.
+1
Also, FWIW, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-17927 has been
resolved.
On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 9:37 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova <e....@gmail.com>
wrote:
> As long as those two are checked to be test issues and we agree to fix
> them before next release, I am also +1
>
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 at 9:42, Josh McKenzie <jm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2022, at 6:49 AM, Aleksey Yeshchenko wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> > On 3 Oct 2022, at 06:27, Berenguer Blasi <be...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1
>> >
>> > On 30/9/22 16:20, Brandon Williams wrote:
>> >> I'm +1 under these conditions as well.
>> >>
>> >> Kind Regards,
>> >> Brandon
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 3:34 PM Mick Semb Wever <mc...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who
>> has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are
>> considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding +1s
>> and no -1's.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> So long as the ongoing 'release criteria' thread permits, I'm +1
>> >>> (I won't close the vote until that thread summarises, up to you Josh
>> when.)
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm ok with waivers on the two new flakies 17927 and 17928, so long
>> as they block the next (beta or rc) release. Both appear to be only test
>> related.
>> >>>
>> >>> Checked
>> >>> - signing correct
>> >>> - checksums are correct
>> >>> - source artefact builds
>> >>> - binary artefact runs
>> >>> - debian package runs
>> >>> - redhat package runs
>> >>>
>> >>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1-beta1
Posted by Ekaterina Dimitrova <e....@gmail.com>.
As long as those two are checked to be test issues and we agree to fix them
before next release, I am also +1
On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 at 9:42, Josh McKenzie <jm...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2022, at 6:49 AM, Aleksey Yeshchenko wrote:
>
> +1
>
> > On 3 Oct 2022, at 06:27, Berenguer Blasi <be...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On 30/9/22 16:20, Brandon Williams wrote:
> >> I'm +1 under these conditions as well.
> >>
> >> Kind Regards,
> >> Brandon
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 3:34 PM Mick Semb Wever <mc...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who
> has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are
> considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding +1s
> and no -1's.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> So long as the ongoing 'release criteria' thread permits, I'm +1
> >>> (I won't close the vote until that thread summarises, up to you Josh
> when.)
> >>>
> >>> I'm ok with waivers on the two new flakies 17927 and 17928, so long as
> they block the next (beta or rc) release. Both appear to be only test
> related.
> >>>
> >>> Checked
> >>> - signing correct
> >>> - checksums are correct
> >>> - source artefact builds
> >>> - binary artefact runs
> >>> - debian package runs
> >>> - redhat package runs
> >>>
> >>>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1-beta1
Posted by Josh McKenzie <jm...@apache.org>.
+1
On Mon, Oct 3, 2022, at 6:49 AM, Aleksey Yeshchenko wrote:
> +1
>
> > On 3 Oct 2022, at 06:27, Berenguer Blasi <be...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On 30/9/22 16:20, Brandon Williams wrote:
> >> I'm +1 under these conditions as well.
> >>
> >> Kind Regards,
> >> Brandon
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 3:34 PM Mick Semb Wever <mc...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding +1s and no -1's.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> So long as the ongoing 'release criteria' thread permits, I'm +1
> >>> (I won't close the vote until that thread summarises, up to you Josh when.)
> >>>
> >>> I'm ok with waivers on the two new flakies 17927 and 17928, so long as they block the next (beta or rc) release. Both appear to be only test related.
> >>>
> >>> Checked
> >>> - signing correct
> >>> - checksums are correct
> >>> - source artefact builds
> >>> - binary artefact runs
> >>> - debian package runs
> >>> - redhat package runs
> >>>
> >>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1-beta1
Posted by Aleksey Yeshchenko <al...@apple.com>.
+1
> On 3 Oct 2022, at 06:27, Berenguer Blasi <be...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On 30/9/22 16:20, Brandon Williams wrote:
>> I'm +1 under these conditions as well.
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>> Brandon
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 3:34 PM Mick Semb Wever <mc...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding +1s and no -1's.
>>>
>>>
>>> So long as the ongoing 'release criteria' thread permits, I'm +1
>>> (I won't close the vote until that thread summarises, up to you Josh when.)
>>>
>>> I'm ok with waivers on the two new flakies 17927 and 17928, so long as they block the next (beta or rc) release. Both appear to be only test related.
>>>
>>> Checked
>>> - signing correct
>>> - checksums are correct
>>> - source artefact builds
>>> - binary artefact runs
>>> - debian package runs
>>> - redhat package runs
>>>
>>>