You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> on 2012/04/03 16:05:31 UTC

T&R of 2.4.2 this week.

I'd like to T&R 2.4.2 this week in hopes of doing the actual
release early next week...

Comments?

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA

Posted by Stefan Fritsch <sf...@sfritsch.de>.
On Thursday 05 April 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found
> at the usual place:
> 
> 	http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
> 
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.2 GA.
> NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
> easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
> of the official release.
> 
>  [ ] +1: Good to go
>  [ ] +0: meh
>  [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
> 
> Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.

+1

tested on Debian sid with system apr/apr-util and with --with-
included-apr



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA

Posted by Michael Felt <ma...@gmail.com>.
my vote "does not count", but I have been able to build with vac.C v7 and
v11 with no changes

using gcc-4.6.3  needed some tweaking as apr is dependent upon compiler
used.

The apachectl -t "test" is successful on all three.

+1

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:

> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
>        http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.2 GA.
> NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
> easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
> of the official release.
>
>  [ ] +1: Good to go
>  [ ] +0: meh
>  [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
>
> Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA

Posted by Steffen <in...@apachelounge.com>.
Tested and used  by quite some users at AL.

All building and running good on all the flavors (Win32 and Win64 with VC9 
and VC10).

Build with IPv6 and Crypto enabled and the deps:
apr-1.4.6 (patched) apr-util-1.4.1 apr-iconv-1.2.1 openssl-1.0.1-and-0.9.8u 
zlib-1.2.6 pcre-8.30 libxml2-2.7.8 lua-5.1.5 expat-2.1.0

Steffen



ps,
The AcceptFilter none is still an issue, as reported.



-----Original Message----- 
From: Jim Jagielski
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 2:24 PM Newsgroups: gmane.comp.apache.devel
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA

The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found
at the usual place:

http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/

I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.2 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
of the official release.

[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.

Vote will last the normal 72 hrs. 


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA

Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
On 15.04.2012 19:10, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 15.04.2012 18:54, schrieb Daniel Gruno:
>>> so to me it looks as if either SSI or type assingment is currently
>>> broken - at least on NetWare, not yet tested on other platforms ...
>>>
>> I have tested your SSI tag with 2.4.2 on Debian 6 and Fedora 16 with the
>> following options set:
>>
>>      Options +Includes
>>      AddType text/html .shtml
>>      AddOutputFilter INCLUDES .shtml
>>
>> Even without the html tags, this seems to work perfectly on the machines
>> I have tested it on, so it might just be a NetWare issue
>
> what is the reason to use Netware for a webserver?
> besides the fact that there are so many operating
> systems running httpd fine and Netware is EOL at all

Please start a new thread if you want to discuss a new topic. This is 
out of scope for the 2.4.2 release vote.

And most likely it would be better to discuss it on the user list.

Thank you.

Rainer


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA

Posted by "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
On 4/16/2012 8:10 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> This is NOT the list for starting OS wars on.
> 
> Could you please point me to the correct list for that
> kind of thing? (:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3AOperating_system_advocacy

That's been asked before ;-P


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA

Posted by Igor Galić <i....@brainsware.org>.

----- Original Message -----
> This is NOT the list for starting OS wars on.

Could you please point me to the correct list for that
kind of thing? (:

i

-- 
Igor Galić

Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Mail: i.galic@brainsware.org
URL: http://brainsware.org/
GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515  2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA

Posted by Noel Butler <no...@ausics.net>.
This is NOT the list for starting OS wars on.


On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 19:10 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:


> what is the reason to use Netware for a webserver?
> besides the fact that there are so many operating
> systems running httpd fine and Netware is EOL at all
> 
> 



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA

Posted by Reindl Harald <h....@thelounge.net>.

Am 15.04.2012 18:54, schrieb Daniel Gruno:
>> so to me it looks as if either SSI or type assingment is currently
>> broken - at least on NetWare, not yet tested on other platforms ...
>>
> I have tested your SSI tag with 2.4.2 on Debian 6 and Fedora 16 with the
> following options set:
> 
>     Options +Includes
>     AddType text/html .shtml
>     AddOutputFilter INCLUDES .shtml
> 
> Even without the html tags, this seems to work perfectly on the machines
> I have tested it on, so it might just be a NetWare issue

what is the reason to use Netware for a webserver?
besides the fact that there are so many operating
systems running httpd fine and Netware is EOL at all



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA

Posted by Guenter Knauf <fu...@apache.org>.
Hi Daniel,
Am 15.04.2012 18:54, schrieb Daniel Gruno:
> I have tested your SSI tag with 2.4.2 on Debian 6 and Fedora 16 with the
> following options set:
>
>      Options +Includes
>      AddType text/html .shtml
>      AddOutputFilter INCLUDES .shtml
>
> Even without the html tags, this seems to work perfectly on the machines
> I have tested it on, so it might just be a NetWare issue.
thanks for testing! SO I need to dig some deeper ...

Gün.



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA

Posted by Daniel Gruno <ru...@cord.dk>.
On 15-04-2012 18:36, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Am 15.04.2012 13:47, schrieb Noel Butler:
>> On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 13:10 +0200, Guenter Knauf wrote:
>>> <!--#echo var="REMOTE_ADDR"-->
>>
>> Related to the removal of config option DefaultType perhaps?
> maybe ...
> however then I would assume that assigning
> text/html shtml shtm
> in conf/mime.types should fix it - but it doesnt - at least not for
> NetWare; and even a
> ForceType text/html
> for the directory doesnt work for me, and
> AddType text/html .shtml
> doesnt either ...
> 
> so to me it looks as if either SSI or type assingment is currently
> broken - at least on NetWare, not yet tested on other platforms ...
> 
> Gün.
> 
> 
I have tested your SSI tag with 2.4.2 on Debian 6 and Fedora 16 with the
following options set:

    Options +Includes
    AddType text/html .shtml
    AddOutputFilter INCLUDES .shtml

Even without the html tags, this seems to work perfectly on the machines
I have tested it on, so it might just be a NetWare issue.

With regards,
Daniel.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA

Posted by Guenter Knauf <fu...@apache.org>.
Am 15.04.2012 13:47, schrieb Noel Butler:
> On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 13:10 +0200, Guenter Knauf wrote:
>> <!--#echo var="REMOTE_ADDR"-->
>
> Related to the removal of config option DefaultType perhaps?
maybe ...
however then I would assume that assigning
text/html shtml shtm
in conf/mime.types should fix it - but it doesnt - at least not for 
NetWare; and even a
ForceType text/html
for the directory doesnt work for me, and
AddType text/html .shtml
doesnt either ...

so to me it looks as if either SSI or type assingment is currently 
broken - at least on NetWare, not yet tested on other platforms ...

Gün.



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA

Posted by Noel Butler <no...@ausics.net>.
On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 13:10 +0200, Guenter Knauf wrote:

> <!--#echo var="REMOTE_ADDR"-->


Related to the removal of config option DefaultType perhaps?


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA

Posted by Guenter Knauf <fu...@apache.org>.
Am 06.04.2012 18:39, schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>
> On Apr 5, 2012, at 8:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found
>> at the usual place:
>>
>> 	http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>>
>> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.2 GA.
>> NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
>> easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
>> of the official release.
I just found that a simple SSI .shtml does not work as plain text any 
more as it did with 2.2.x;
f.e. an ip.shtml with:
<!--#echo var="REMOTE_ADDR"-->

gives me an empty reply with 2.4.2 while same works fine with 2.2.x;
if I surround the SSI with html tags like:
<html>
<!--#echo var="REMOTE_ADDR"-->
</html>

it works with 2.4.2 - is this now intented behavior, or am I missing 
something in the config?

Gün.



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA

Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
>> [X] +1: Good to go
>

+1 on AIX / xlc / PPC64, no regressions.

(100% other than SSL, not normally loaded on my AIX regression)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA

Posted by Noel Butler <no...@ausics.net>.
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 12:39 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:

> On Apr 5, 2012, at 8:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
> > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found
> > at the usual place:
> > 
> > 	http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
> > 
> > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.2 GA.
> > NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
> > easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
> > of the official release.
> > 
> > [X] +1: Good to go
> 
> +1 on Fed16, OSX (Xcode 4.3.2), FreeBSD 8.2-p6


+1 Slackware 13.1 , 13.37


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA

Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On Apr 5, 2012, at 8:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found
> at the usual place:
> 
> 	http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
> 
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.2 GA.
> NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
> easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
> of the official release.
> 
> [X] +1: Good to go

+1 on Fed16, OSX (Xcode 4.3.2), FreeBSD 8.2-p6

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA

Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
I'm planning on letting the vote run for a few more days, just
in case, and, if all is well, we can announce on Monday.

Good news always should be announced early in the week :)

On Apr 5, 2012, at 8:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found
> at the usual place:
> 
> 	http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
> 
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.2 GA.
> NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
> easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
> of the official release.
> 
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
> 
> Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.
> 


Re: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA

Posted by Igor Galić <i....@brainsware.org>.
+1

----- Original Message -----
> With 3+ +1 (binding) votes and no -1s, I call the vote CLOSED
> and PASSED.
> 
> Thx to all testers!
> 
> On Apr 5, 2012, at 8:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
> > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found
> > at the usual place:
> > 
> > 	http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
> > 
> > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.2 GA.
> > NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
> > easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
> > of the official release.
> > 
> > [ ] +1: Good to go
> > [ ] +0: meh
> > [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
> > 
> > Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.
> > 
> 
> 

-- 
Igor Galić

Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Mail: i.galic@brainsware.org
URL: http://brainsware.org/
GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515  2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE


[RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA

Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@apache.org>.
With 3+ +1 (binding) votes and no -1s, I call the vote CLOSED
and PASSED.

Thx to all testers!

On Apr 5, 2012, at 8:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found
> at the usual place:
> 
> 	http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
> 
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.2 GA.
> NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
> easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
> of the official release.
> 
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
> 
> Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.
> 


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA

Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
On 05.04.2012 14:24, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> 	http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.2 GA.
> NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
> easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
> of the official release.
>
>   [X] +1: Good to go
>   [ ] +0: meh
>   [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
>
> Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.

+1 for GA

Test Details:

- Sigs and hashes OK
- contents of tarballs identical
- contents of tag and tarballs identical
   except for expected deltas
   (we could cleanup some m4 files in apr-util/xml/expat/conftools
    at the end of buildconf, no regression)

Built on

- Solaris 8+10 Sparc as 32 Bit Binaries
- SLES 10 (32/64 Bits)
- SLES 11 (64 Bits)
- RHEL 5 and 6 (64 Bits)

- with default (shared) and static modules
- with module sets none, few, most, all, reallyall and default
   (always mod_privileges disabled)
- using --enable-load-all-modules
- against "included" APR/APU from deps tarball and
   external APR/APU 1.4.6/1.4.1

- using external libraries
   - expat 2.1.0
   - pcre 8.30
   - openssl 1.0.1
   - lua 5.2.0
   - distcache 1.5.1
   - libxml2 2.7.8-1

- Tool chain:
     - platform gcc except for Solaris
       (gcc 4.1.2 for Solaris 8 and 4.6.2 for Solaris 10)
     - CFLAGS: -O2 -g -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing
               (and -mpcu=v9 on Solaris)

All builds succeeded except for

- SLES 10 many static builds stop with error or crash during
   linking httpd IMHO because of too many commandline params
   (not a regression)
   - with "reallyall", "all" or "most" modules

Tested for

- Solaris 8+10 (32), SLES 10 (32/64), SLES 11 (64), RHEL 5+6 (64)
- MPMs prefork, worker, event (except for Solaris 8 - no event)
- default (shared) and static modules
- log levels info, debug and trace8
- module set reallyall

All Tests passed with the following exceptions:

a Test 5 in t/modules/dav.t:
   4 out of 222 tested builds had the "created" time after
   the "modified" time.
   This seems to be a platform issue, all tests done on NFS,
   many tested on virtualized guests.

b Test 8 in t/ssl/pr12355.t:
   Of the more than 200 runs there was one that failed this test,
   (on SLES 10). 60000 bytes were posted, but only 49126 bytes received
   (a little less than 48K). Not reproducible, very rare.
   PR 12355 is: POST incompatible w/ renegotiate https: connection

Both are not regressions (observed for 2.4.1 as well), are not strictly 
reproducible and at least b is extremely rare.

Rainer

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA

Posted by Igor Galić <i....@brainsware.org>.

----- Original Message -----
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found
> at the usual place:
> 
> 	http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
> 
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.2 GA.
> NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
> easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
> of the official release.
> 
>  [x] +1: Good to go
>  [ ] +0: meh
>  [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
> 
> Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.
> 

Fedora 16/amd64. apr $latest stable.
Works fine with PHP, too.

i

-- 
Igor Galić

Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Mail: i.galic@brainsware.org
URL: http://brainsware.org/
GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515  2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE


[VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.2 as GA

Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found
at the usual place:

	http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/

I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.2 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
of the official release.

 [ ] +1: Good to go
 [ ] +0: meh
 [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.

Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.

Re: T&R of 2.4.2 this week.

Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
I'll be T&Ring 2.4.2 this afternoon (eastern).
On Apr 3, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

> 
> I'd like to T&R 2.4.2 this week in hopes of doing the actual
> release early next week...
> 
> Comments?
> 


Re: 2.4.2 Windows still beta.

Posted by Mario Brandt <jb...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
>> Noticed (no discuss) that AccepFilter https none is still broken.

> At the very least we are no longer holding the rest of the
> 2.4.x community hostage (by delaying releases) because of
> Windows issues :/

I realy understand Steffens point. But 2.4.1 with that issue is
already released. I think it is a good idea to release 2.4.2 even if
that is not solved yet like done with 2.4.1. And I also think that
Steffen means that it is not a show stopper for 2.4.2. The other stuff
is running well on windows like on the other OSs.

> We used to have access to Microsoft test environs, etc... maybe
> we need to see if we can still have that happen. I might ping
> Gianugo and see if we can get some MS support here.

That would be great if you can get some help there. There will be
windows tester if you offer a patch for testing :-)


Cheers
Mario

Re: 2.4.2 Windows still beta.

Posted by Igor Galić <i....@brainsware.org>.
Putting Gav on CC, because Joes told me to talk to him.

----- Original Message -----
> I'm not sure how to resolve this... there are only a handful of
> people who have ever hacked on the Windows stuff and they all
> seem pre-occupied w/ other issues. Yeah, it bothers me, but
> I don't know what can be done.
> 
> At the very least we are no longer holding the rest of the
> 2.4.x community hostage (by delaying releases) because of
> Windows issues :/
> 
> We used to have access to Microsoft test environs, etc... maybe
> we need to see if we can still have that happen. I might ping
> Gianugo and see if we can get some MS support here.

http://ci.apache.org/

* bb-2008: Windows 2008 (Standard) Server (VM run on Nyx VMware Server)

* bb-win7: Windows 7 Ultimate (VM run on Nyx VMware Server)


The question is: What kind of compiler suite do we have
installed on those machines (if any).
How fast can we get a build up and running?
Who can help? When? To get it up to speed?

Volunteers?


i


-- 
Igor Galić

Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Mail: i.galic@brainsware.org
URL: http://brainsware.org/
GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515  2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE

Re: 2.4.2 Windows still beta.

Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
I'm not sure how to resolve this... there are only a handful of
people who have ever hacked on the Windows stuff and they all
seem pre-occupied w/ other issues. Yeah, it bothers me, but
I don't know what can be done.

At the very least we are no longer holding the rest of the
2.4.x community hostage (by delaying releases) because of
Windows issues :/

We used to have access to Microsoft test environs, etc... maybe
we need to see if we can still have that happen. I might ping
Gianugo and see if we can get some MS support here.
 
On Apr 4, 2012, at 10:02 AM, Steffen wrote:

> Noticed (no discuss) that AccepFilter https none is still broken.
> 
> No problem here, can use IIS or 2.2 in front to have SSL.
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: Jim Jagielski Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 4:05 PM Newsgroups: gmane.comp.apache.devel To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: T&R of 2.4.2 this week. 
> 
> I'd like to T&R 2.4.2 this week in hopes of doing the actual
> release early next week...
> 
> Comments?
> 


2.4.2 Windows still beta.

Posted by Steffen <in...@apachelounge.com>.
Noticed (no discuss) that AccepFilter https none is still broken.

No problem here, can use IIS or 2.2 in front to have SSL.

-----Original Message----- 
From: Jim Jagielski 
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 4:05 PM Newsgroups: gmane.comp.apache.devel 
To: dev@httpd.apache.org 
Subject: T&R of 2.4.2 this week. 


I'd like to T&R 2.4.2 this week in hopes of doing the actual
release early next week...

Comments?

Re: T&R of 2.4.2 this week.

Posted by Igor Galić <i....@brainsware.org>.

----- Original Message -----
> 
> I'd like to T&R 2.4.2 this week in hopes of doing the actual
> release early next week...
> 
> Comments?

Considering how empty STATUS is, I'd say go for it!

i

-- 
Igor Galić

Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Mail: i.galic@brainsware.org
URL: http://brainsware.org/
GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515  2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE