You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Adonis Raduca <ad...@yahoo.com> on 2007/12/08 16:33:29 UTC
myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?
Hello
I look on all comments and I seen the majority agree with the MyFaces capital
"M" version. I know that many of us are familiar with
MyFaces version and I either. I propose the myFaces, small "m" from
the differentiation reasons. Now a days we are invaded with names like MySpace,
MyPortal, MyDocuments, MySomething, MyXxxx. All of them are written with
capital M, small y, after a word that starts with a capital letter. So I tried
to avoid this common pattern and provide myFaces with a distinctive look, which
stands out from the crowd … after all a brand means personality …. we must be open minded ... :)
What do you think ?
Have a nice weekend !
Adonis
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?
Posted by Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>.
I prefer the lower case "m",
Cheers,
Bruno
On 08/12/2007, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I prefer the "M"
>
> On Dec 8, 2007 8:33 AM, Adonis Raduca <ad...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I look on all comments and I seen the majority agree with the MyFaces
> > capital "M" version. I know that many of us are familiar with MyFaces
> > version and I either. I propose the myFaces, small "m" from the
> > differentiation reasons. Now a days we are invaded with names like MySpace,
> > MyPortal, MyDocuments, MySomething, MyXxxx. All of them are written with
> > capital M, small y, after a word that starts with a capital letter. So I
> > tried to avoid this common pattern and provide myFaces with a distinctive
> > look, which stands out from the crowd … after all a brand means personality
> > …. we must be open minded ... :)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > What do you think ?
> >
> > Have a nice weekend !
> > Adonis
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
>
Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?
Posted by Cagatay Civici <ca...@gmail.com>.
M :)
On Dec 8, 2007 9:47 PM, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am not so sure if it is the same writing the official name of the
> project (Apache MyFaces) that what we find in the (myFaceS). For
> instance, most of the time we write in this list "Oracle" instead of
> "ORACLE" (logo). I guess we should just choose which one is more
> appealing to us, so just vote and let the outcome be our choice :)
>
> My 2 cents,
>
> Bruno
>
> On 08/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > I too, and I think it is confusing, when we start to write it
> wrong......
> > >
> > <snip/>
> >
> > Indeed, its important to get the name right (case et al), especially
> > in the logo :-)
> >
> > -Rahul
> >
>
Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?
Posted by Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>.
I meant for the bridge logos.. :) Sorry!
Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> Adonis,
>
> I agree. It's looking like people like logo 5 on your last set of
> logos. Can we get a hi-res and lowres version of that logo with all
> the caps. And once again, thanks for doing all of this. They look
> great.
>
> I also noticed on the PDF's you sent up that you had "watermarked" the
> page with the logo in the background. How hard would it be to donate
> a watermark as well, I think it might be nice as the backgrounds for
> the various websites.
>
> Scott
>
>
> Adonis Raduca wrote:
>>
>> It appears that almost all of us are accustomed with MyFaces written
>> with the capital "M". So I will change accordingly the logotype.
>>
>> I think that will be good if we can use this naming style for all
>> MyFaces projects.
>> Something like:
>> Tobago, Tomahawk, Trinidad, Orchestra, and so on.
>>
>> If we find appropriate this convention we can apply it for the
>> portlet bridge also, so we will have "PortletBridge" instead
>> "portlet bridge"
>> Have a nice day !
>> Adonis
>>
>>
>> On 12/10/07, *Grant Smith* <work.grant@gmail.com
>> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> M
>>
>>
>> On Dec 9, 2007 7:46 PM, Dennis Byrne < dennisbyrne@apache.org
>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Capital M, always.
>>
>>
>> On 12/9/07, *Catalin Kormos* < catalin.kormos@gmail.com
>> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I also prefer "M", as i always known MyFaces like that,
>> and agreed with Mathias for the naming convention "Apache
>> MyFaces", etc instead of "Apache myFaces", etc.
>>
>> regards,
>> Catalin
>>
>> On Dec 9, 2007 2:18 PM, Hazem Saleh <hazem.saleh@gmail.com
>> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> +1 for M :).
>>
>> On Dec 9, 2007 1:34 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
>> <matzew@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>> > I'd always call it:
>> > Apache MyFaces Tomahawk
>> > Apache MyFaces Tobago
>> > Apache MyFaces Trinidad
>> > Apache MyFaces Blah
>> > ...
>> >
>> >
>> > On Dec 9, 2007 3:25 AM, Adonis Raduca <
>> adonis.raduca@codebeat.ro
>> <ma...@codebeat.ro>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I think that is important to have a consistent
>> naming strategy for all
>> > > myFaces (MyFaces) projects. For example I thought
>> to one similar with the
>> > > Java naming convention for the instance variables.
>> > > Something like:
>> > > myFaces
>> > > tobago
>> > > tomahawk
>> > > …
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I think that once the naming strategy will be in
>> place must be respected
>> > > everywhere (logos, text stuff, etc.)
>> > >
>> > > Adonis
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org
>> <ma...@apache.org> > wrote:
>> > > > Eh, I think that is total different beast.
>> > > > We all work here as individuals and it is ok to
>> "misspell" names...
>> > > >
>> > > > But... starting to misspell the own project, is
>> ... yes, confusing.
>> > > >
>> > > > -M
>> > > >
>> > > > On Dec 8, 2007 8:47 PM, Bruno Aranda <
>> brunoaranda@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>> > > > > I am not so sure if it is the same writing the
>> official name of the
>> > > > > project (Apache MyFaces) that what we find in
>> the (myFaceS). For
>> > > > > instance, most of the time we write in this
>> list "Oracle" instead of
>> > > > > "ORACLE" (logo). I guess we should just choose
>> which one is more
>> > > > > appealing to us, so just vote and let the
>> outcome be our choice :)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > My 2 cents,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Bruno
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On 08/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar
>> <rahul.akolkar@gmail.com
>> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > > > > > On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf <
>> matzew@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>> > > > > > > I too, and I think it is confusing, when we
>> start to write it
>> > > wrong......
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > <snip/>
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Indeed, its important to get the name right
>> (case et al), especially
>> > > > > > in the logo :-)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > -Rahul
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
>> > > >
>> > > > further stuff:
>> > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>> >
>> > further stuff:
>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> <http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf>
>> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed
>> http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog
>> <http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- Dennis Byrne
>>
>>
>>
>> -- Grant Smith
>>
>>
>
>
Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?
Posted by Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>.
Adonis,
I agree. It's looking like people like logo 5 on your last set of
logos. Can we get a hi-res and lowres version of that logo with all the
caps. And once again, thanks for doing all of this. They look great.
I also noticed on the PDF's you sent up that you had "watermarked" the
page with the logo in the background. How hard would it be to donate a
watermark as well, I think it might be nice as the backgrounds for the
various websites.
Scott
Adonis Raduca wrote:
>
> It appears that almost all of us are accustomed with MyFaces written
> with the capital "M". So I will change accordingly the logotype.
>
> I think that will be good if we can use this naming style for all
> MyFaces projects.
> Something like:
> Tobago, Tomahawk, Trinidad, Orchestra, and so on.
>
> If we find appropriate this convention we can apply it for the portlet
> bridge also, so we will have "PortletBridge" instead "portlet bridge"
>
> Have a nice day !
> Adonis
>
>
> On 12/10/07, *Grant Smith* <work.grant@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> M
>
>
> On Dec 9, 2007 7:46 PM, Dennis Byrne < dennisbyrne@apache.org
> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>
> Capital M, always.
>
>
> On 12/9/07, *Catalin Kormos* < catalin.kormos@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I also prefer "M", as i always known MyFaces like that,
> and agreed with Mathias for the naming convention "Apache
> MyFaces", etc instead of "Apache myFaces", etc.
>
> regards,
> Catalin
>
> On Dec 9, 2007 2:18 PM, Hazem Saleh <hazem.saleh@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> +1 for M :).
>
> On Dec 9, 2007 1:34 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
> <matzew@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> > I'd always call it:
> > Apache MyFaces Tomahawk
> > Apache MyFaces Tobago
> > Apache MyFaces Trinidad
> > Apache MyFaces Blah
> > ...
> >
> >
> > On Dec 9, 2007 3:25 AM, Adonis Raduca <
> adonis.raduca@codebeat.ro
> <ma...@codebeat.ro>> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I think that is important to have a consistent
> naming strategy for all
> > > myFaces (MyFaces) projects. For example I thought
> to one similar with the
> > > Java naming convention for the instance variables.
> > > Something like:
> > > myFaces
> > > tobago
> > > tomahawk
> > > …
> > >
> > >
> > > I think that once the naming strategy will be in
> place must be respected
> > > everywhere (logos, text stuff, etc.)
> > >
> > > Adonis
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org
> <ma...@apache.org> > wrote:
> > > > Eh, I think that is total different beast.
> > > > We all work here as individuals and it is ok to
> "misspell" names...
> > > >
> > > > But... starting to misspell the own project, is
> ... yes, confusing.
> > > >
> > > > -M
> > > >
> > > > On Dec 8, 2007 8:47 PM, Bruno Aranda <
> brunoaranda@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> > > > > I am not so sure if it is the same writing the
> official name of the
> > > > > project (Apache MyFaces) that what we find in
> the (myFaceS). For
> > > > > instance, most of the time we write in this
> list "Oracle" instead of
> > > > > "ORACLE" (logo). I guess we should just choose
> which one is more
> > > > > appealing to us, so just vote and let the
> outcome be our choice :)
> > > > >
> > > > > My 2 cents,
> > > > >
> > > > > Bruno
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 08/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar
> <rahul.akolkar@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > > > > On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf <
> matzew@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> > > > > > > I too, and I think it is confusing, when we
> start to write it
> > > wrong......
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > <snip/>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Indeed, its important to get the name right
> (case et al), especially
> > > > > > in the logo :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Rahul
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > > > further stuff:
> > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> <http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf>
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed
> http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog
> <http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Dennis Byrne
>
>
>
>
> --
> Grant Smith
>
>
Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
Yes, clear - one for all.
regards,
Martin
On 12/10/07, Adonis Raduca <ad...@codebeat.ro> wrote:
> It appears that almost all of us are accustomed with MyFaces written with
> the capital "M". So I will change accordingly the logotype.
>
> I think that will be good if we can use this naming style for all MyFaces
> projects.
> Something like:
> Tobago, Tomahawk, Trinidad, Orchestra, and so on.
>
> If we find appropriate this convention we can apply it for the portlet
> bridge also, so we will have "PortletBridge" instead "portlet bridge"
>
> Have a nice day !
> Adonis
>
>
> On 12/10/07, Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > M
> >
> > On Dec 9, 2007 7:46 PM, Dennis Byrne <de...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Capital M, always.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12/9/07, Catalin Kormos <catalin.kormos@gmail.com > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I also prefer "M", as i always known MyFaces like that, and agreed
> > > > with Mathias for the naming convention "Apache MyFaces", etc instead
> of
> > > > "Apache myFaces", etc.
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > > Catalin
> > > >
> > > > On Dec 9, 2007 2:18 PM, Hazem Saleh <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 for M :).
> > > > >
> > > > > On Dec 9, 2007 1:34 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > I'd always call it:
> > > > > > Apache MyFaces Tomahawk
> > > > > > Apache MyFaces Tobago
> > > > > > Apache MyFaces Trinidad
> > > > > > Apache MyFaces Blah
> > > > > > ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Dec 9, 2007 3:25 AM, Adonis Raduca < adonis.raduca@codebeat.ro
> >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think that is important to have a consistent naming strategy
> > > > > for all
> > > > > > > myFaces (MyFaces) projects. For example I thought to one similar
> > > > > with the
> > > > > > > Java naming convention for the instance variables.
> > > > > > > Something like:
> > > > > > > myFaces
> > > > > > > tobago
> > > > > > > tomahawk
> > > > > > > …
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think that once the naming strategy will be in place must be
> > > > > respected
> > > > > > > everywhere (logos, text stuff, etc.)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Adonis
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org > wrote:
> > > > > > > > Eh, I think that is total different beast.
> > > > > > > > We all work here as individuals and it is ok to "misspell"
> > > > > names...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > But... starting to misspell the own project, is ... yes,
> > > > > confusing.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -M
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Dec 8, 2007 8:47 PM, Bruno Aranda < brunoaranda@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > I am not so sure if it is the same writing the official name
> > > > > of the
> > > > > > > > > project (Apache MyFaces) that what we find in the (myFaceS).
> > > > > For
> > > > > > > > > instance, most of the time we write in this list "Oracle"
> > > > > instead of
> > > > > > > > > "ORACLE" (logo). I guess we should just choose which one is
> > > > > more
> > > > > > > > > appealing to us, so just vote and let the outcome be our
> > > > > choice :)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > My 2 cents,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Bruno
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 08/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > I too, and I think it is confusing, when we start to
> > > > > write it
> > > > > > > wrong......
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > <snip/>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Indeed, its important to get the name right (case et al),
> > > > > especially
> > > > > > > > > > in the logo :-)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > -Rahul
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > >
> > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed
> > > > > http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Dennis Byrne
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Grant Smith
> >
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?
Posted by Adonis Raduca <ad...@codebeat.ro>.
It appears that almost all of us are accustomed with MyFaces written with
the capital "M". So I will change accordingly the logotype.
I think that will be good if we can use this naming style for all MyFaces
projects.
Something like:
Tobago, Tomahawk, Trinidad, Orchestra, and so on.
If we find appropriate this convention we can apply it for the portlet
bridge also, so we will have "PortletBridge" instead "portlet bridge"
Have a nice day !
Adonis
On 12/10/07, Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> M
>
> On Dec 9, 2007 7:46 PM, Dennis Byrne <de...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Capital M, always.
> >
> >
> > On 12/9/07, Catalin Kormos <catalin.kormos@gmail.com > wrote:
> > >
> > > I also prefer "M", as i always known MyFaces like that, and agreed
> > > with Mathias for the naming convention "Apache MyFaces", etc instead of
> > > "Apache myFaces", etc.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > Catalin
> > >
> > > On Dec 9, 2007 2:18 PM, Hazem Saleh <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 for M :).
> > > >
> > > > On Dec 9, 2007 1:34 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > I'd always call it:
> > > > > Apache MyFaces Tomahawk
> > > > > Apache MyFaces Tobago
> > > > > Apache MyFaces Trinidad
> > > > > Apache MyFaces Blah
> > > > > ...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Dec 9, 2007 3:25 AM, Adonis Raduca < adonis.raduca@codebeat.ro >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think that is important to have a consistent naming strategy
> > > > for all
> > > > > > myFaces (MyFaces) projects. For example I thought to one similar
> > > > with the
> > > > > > Java naming convention for the instance variables.
> > > > > > Something like:
> > > > > > myFaces
> > > > > > tobago
> > > > > > tomahawk
> > > > > > …
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think that once the naming strategy will be in place must be
> > > > respected
> > > > > > everywhere (logos, text stuff, etc.)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Adonis
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org > wrote:
> > > > > > > Eh, I think that is total different beast.
> > > > > > > We all work here as individuals and it is ok to "misspell"
> > > > names...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But... starting to misspell the own project, is ... yes,
> > > > confusing.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -M
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Dec 8, 2007 8:47 PM, Bruno Aranda < brunoaranda@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > I am not so sure if it is the same writing the official name
> > > > of the
> > > > > > > > project (Apache MyFaces) that what we find in the (myFaceS).
> > > > For
> > > > > > > > instance, most of the time we write in this list "Oracle"
> > > > instead of
> > > > > > > > "ORACLE" (logo). I guess we should just choose which one is
> > > > more
> > > > > > > > appealing to us, so just vote and let the outcome be our
> > > > choice :)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > My 2 cents,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Bruno
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 08/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > I too, and I think it is confusing, when we start to
> > > > write it
> > > > > > wrong......
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > <snip/>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Indeed, its important to get the name right (case et al),
> > > > especially
> > > > > > > > > in the logo :-)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -Rahul
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > >
> > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed
> > > > http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dennis Byrne
>
>
>
>
> --
> Grant Smith
>
Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?
Posted by Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com>.
M
On Dec 9, 2007 7:46 PM, Dennis Byrne <de...@apache.org> wrote:
> Capital M, always.
>
>
> On 12/9/07, Catalin Kormos <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I also prefer "M", as i always known MyFaces like that, and agreed with
> > Mathias for the naming convention "Apache MyFaces", etc instead of "Apache
> > myFaces", etc.
> >
> > regards,
> > Catalin
> >
> > On Dec 9, 2007 2:18 PM, Hazem Saleh <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for M :).
> > >
> > > On Dec 9, 2007 1:34 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'd always call it:
> > > > Apache MyFaces Tomahawk
> > > > Apache MyFaces Tobago
> > > > Apache MyFaces Trinidad
> > > > Apache MyFaces Blah
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Dec 9, 2007 3:25 AM, Adonis Raduca < adonis.raduca@codebeat.ro >
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I think that is important to have a consistent naming strategy for
> > > all
> > > > > myFaces (MyFaces) projects. For example I thought to one similar
> > > with the
> > > > > Java naming convention for the instance variables.
> > > > > Something like:
> > > > > myFaces
> > > > > tobago
> > > > > tomahawk
> > > > > …
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I think that once the naming strategy will be in place must be
> > > respected
> > > > > everywhere (logos, text stuff, etc.)
> > > > >
> > > > > Adonis
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org > wrote:
> > > > > > Eh, I think that is total different beast.
> > > > > > We all work here as individuals and it is ok to "misspell"
> > > names...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But... starting to misspell the own project, is ... yes,
> > > confusing.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -M
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Dec 8, 2007 8:47 PM, Bruno Aranda < brunoaranda@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > I am not so sure if it is the same writing the official name
> > > of the
> > > > > > > project (Apache MyFaces) that what we find in the (myFaceS).
> > > For
> > > > > > > instance, most of the time we write in this list "Oracle"
> > > instead of
> > > > > > > "ORACLE" (logo). I guess we should just choose which one is
> > > more
> > > > > > > appealing to us, so just vote and let the outcome be our
> > > choice :)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My 2 cents,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Bruno
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 08/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > I too, and I think it is confusing, when we start to write
> > > it
> > > > > wrong......
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > <snip/>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Indeed, its important to get the name right (case et al),
> > > especially
> > > > > > > > in the logo :-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -Rahul
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > >
> > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > > > further stuff:
> > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed
> > > http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Dennis Byrne
--
Grant Smith
Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?
Posted by Dennis Byrne <de...@apache.org>.
Capital M, always.
On 12/9/07, Catalin Kormos <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I also prefer "M", as i always known MyFaces like that, and agreed with
> Mathias for the naming convention "Apache MyFaces", etc instead of "Apache
> myFaces", etc.
>
> regards,
> Catalin
>
> On Dec 9, 2007 2:18 PM, Hazem Saleh <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 for M :).
> >
> > On Dec 9, 2007 1:34 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > I'd always call it:
> > > Apache MyFaces Tomahawk
> > > Apache MyFaces Tobago
> > > Apache MyFaces Trinidad
> > > Apache MyFaces Blah
> > > ...
> > >
> > >
> > > On Dec 9, 2007 3:25 AM, Adonis Raduca <adonis.raduca@codebeat.ro >
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think that is important to have a consistent naming strategy for
> > all
> > > > myFaces (MyFaces) projects. For example I thought to one similar
> > with the
> > > > Java naming convention for the instance variables.
> > > > Something like:
> > > > myFaces
> > > > tobago
> > > > tomahawk
> > > > …
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think that once the naming strategy will be in place must be
> > respected
> > > > everywhere (logos, text stuff, etc.)
> > > >
> > > > Adonis
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org > wrote:
> > > > > Eh, I think that is total different beast.
> > > > > We all work here as individuals and it is ok to "misspell"
> > names...
> > > > >
> > > > > But... starting to misspell the own project, is ... yes,
> > confusing.
> > > > >
> > > > > -M
> > > > >
> > > > > On Dec 8, 2007 8:47 PM, Bruno Aranda < brunoaranda@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > I am not so sure if it is the same writing the official name of
> > the
> > > > > > project (Apache MyFaces) that what we find in the (myFaceS). For
> > > > > > instance, most of the time we write in this list "Oracle"
> > instead of
> > > > > > "ORACLE" (logo). I guess we should just choose which one is more
> >
> > > > > > appealing to us, so just vote and let the outcome be our choice
> > :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My 2 cents,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bruno
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 08/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > I too, and I think it is confusing, when we start to write
> > it
> > > > wrong......
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > <snip/>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Indeed, its important to get the name right (case et al),
> > especially
> > > > > > > in the logo :-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Rahul
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > >
> > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed
> > http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog
> >
>
>
--
Dennis Byrne
Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?
Posted by Ernst Fastl <er...@gmail.com>.
I would also go for the "M" since it is a name and not an instance variable :)
On Dec 10, 2007 12:59 AM, Catalin Kormos <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I also prefer "M", as i always known MyFaces like that, and agreed with
> Mathias for the naming convention "Apache MyFaces", etc instead of "Apache
> myFaces", etc.
>
> regards,
> Catalin
>
>
>
> On Dec 9, 2007 2:18 PM, Hazem Saleh <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1 for M :).
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Dec 9, 2007 1:34 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > I'd always call it:
> > > Apache MyFaces Tomahawk
> > > Apache MyFaces Tobago
> > > Apache MyFaces Trinidad
> > > Apache MyFaces Blah
> > > ...
> > >
> > >
> > > On Dec 9, 2007 3:25 AM, Adonis Raduca <adonis.raduca@codebeat.ro >
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think that is important to have a consistent naming strategy for all
> > > > myFaces (MyFaces) projects. For example I thought to one similar with
> the
> > > > Java naming convention for the instance variables.
> > > > Something like:
> > > > myFaces
> > > > tobago
> > > > tomahawk
> > > > …
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think that once the naming strategy will be in place must be
> respected
> > > > everywhere (logos, text stuff, etc.)
> > > >
> > > > Adonis
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org > wrote:
> > > > > Eh, I think that is total different beast.
> > > > > We all work here as individuals and it is ok to "misspell" names...
> > > > >
> > > > > But... starting to misspell the own project, is ... yes, confusing.
> > > > >
> > > > > -M
> > > > >
> > > > > On Dec 8, 2007 8:47 PM, Bruno Aranda < brunoaranda@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > I am not so sure if it is the same writing the official name of
> the
> > > > > > project (Apache MyFaces) that what we find in the (myFaceS). For
> > > > > > instance, most of the time we write in this list "Oracle" instead
> of
> > > > > > "ORACLE" (logo). I guess we should just choose which one is more
> > > > > > appealing to us, so just vote and let the outcome be our choice :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My 2 cents,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bruno
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 08/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > I too, and I think it is confusing, when we start to write it
> > > > wrong......
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > <snip/>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Indeed, its important to get the name right (case et al),
> especially
> > > > > > > in the logo :-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Rahul
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > >
> > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed
> > http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog
> >
>
>
Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?
Posted by Catalin Kormos <ca...@gmail.com>.
I also prefer "M", as i always known MyFaces like that, and agreed with
Mathias for the naming convention "Apache MyFaces", etc instead of "Apache
myFaces", etc.
regards,
Catalin
On Dec 9, 2007 2:18 PM, Hazem Saleh <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for M :).
>
> On Dec 9, 2007 1:34 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > I'd always call it:
> > Apache MyFaces Tomahawk
> > Apache MyFaces Tobago
> > Apache MyFaces Trinidad
> > Apache MyFaces Blah
> > ...
> >
> >
> > On Dec 9, 2007 3:25 AM, Adonis Raduca <ad...@codebeat.ro> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I think that is important to have a consistent naming strategy for all
> > > myFaces (MyFaces) projects. For example I thought to one similar with
> the
> > > Java naming convention for the instance variables.
> > > Something like:
> > > myFaces
> > > tobago
> > > tomahawk
> > > …
> > >
> > >
> > > I think that once the naming strategy will be in place must be
> respected
> > > everywhere (logos, text stuff, etc.)
> > >
> > > Adonis
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > Eh, I think that is total different beast.
> > > > We all work here as individuals and it is ok to "misspell" names...
> > > >
> > > > But... starting to misspell the own project, is ... yes, confusing.
> > > >
> > > > -M
> > > >
> > > > On Dec 8, 2007 8:47 PM, Bruno Aranda < brunoaranda@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I am not so sure if it is the same writing the official name of
> the
> > > > > project (Apache MyFaces) that what we find in the (myFaceS). For
> > > > > instance, most of the time we write in this list "Oracle" instead
> of
> > > > > "ORACLE" (logo). I guess we should just choose which one is more
> > > > > appealing to us, so just vote and let the outcome be our choice :)
> > > > >
> > > > > My 2 cents,
> > > > >
> > > > > Bruno
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 08/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > I too, and I think it is confusing, when we start to write it
> > > wrong......
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > <snip/>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Indeed, its important to get the name right (case et al),
> especially
> > > > > > in the logo :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Rahul
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > > > further stuff:
> > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed
> http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog
>
Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?
Posted by Hazem Saleh <ha...@gmail.com>.
+1 for M :).
On Dec 9, 2007 1:34 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'd always call it:
> Apache MyFaces Tomahawk
> Apache MyFaces Tobago
> Apache MyFaces Trinidad
> Apache MyFaces Blah
> ...
>
>
> On Dec 9, 2007 3:25 AM, Adonis Raduca <ad...@codebeat.ro> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I think that is important to have a consistent naming strategy for all
> > myFaces (MyFaces) projects. For example I thought to one similar with the
> > Java naming convention for the instance variables.
> > Something like:
> > myFaces
> > tobago
> > tomahawk
> > …
> >
> >
> > I think that once the naming strategy will be in place must be respected
> > everywhere (logos, text stuff, etc.)
> >
> > Adonis
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Eh, I think that is total different beast.
> > > We all work here as individuals and it is ok to "misspell" names...
> > >
> > > But... starting to misspell the own project, is ... yes, confusing.
> > >
> > > -M
> > >
> > > On Dec 8, 2007 8:47 PM, Bruno Aranda < brunoaranda@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I am not so sure if it is the same writing the official name of the
> > > > project (Apache MyFaces) that what we find in the (myFaceS). For
> > > > instance, most of the time we write in this list "Oracle" instead of
> > > > "ORACLE" (logo). I guess we should just choose which one is more
> > > > appealing to us, so just vote and let the outcome be our choice :)
> > > >
> > > > My 2 cents,
> > > >
> > > > Bruno
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 08/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > I too, and I think it is confusing, when we start to write it
> > wrong......
> > > > > >
> > > > > <snip/>
> > > > >
> > > > > Indeed, its important to get the name right (case et al), especially
> > > > > in the logo :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > -Rahul
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
--
Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed
http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog
Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
I'd always call it:
Apache MyFaces Tomahawk
Apache MyFaces Tobago
Apache MyFaces Trinidad
Apache MyFaces Blah
...
On Dec 9, 2007 3:25 AM, Adonis Raduca <ad...@codebeat.ro> wrote:
>
>
> I think that is important to have a consistent naming strategy for all
> myFaces (MyFaces) projects. For example I thought to one similar with the
> Java naming convention for the instance variables.
> Something like:
> myFaces
> tobago
> tomahawk
> …
>
>
> I think that once the naming strategy will be in place must be respected
> everywhere (logos, text stuff, etc.)
>
> Adonis
>
>
>
> On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Eh, I think that is total different beast.
> > We all work here as individuals and it is ok to "misspell" names...
> >
> > But... starting to misspell the own project, is ... yes, confusing.
> >
> > -M
> >
> > On Dec 8, 2007 8:47 PM, Bruno Aranda < brunoaranda@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I am not so sure if it is the same writing the official name of the
> > > project (Apache MyFaces) that what we find in the (myFaceS). For
> > > instance, most of the time we write in this list "Oracle" instead of
> > > "ORACLE" (logo). I guess we should just choose which one is more
> > > appealing to us, so just vote and let the outcome be our choice :)
> > >
> > > My 2 cents,
> > >
> > > Bruno
> > >
> > >
> > > On 08/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > I too, and I think it is confusing, when we start to write it
> wrong......
> > > > >
> > > > <snip/>
> > > >
> > > > Indeed, its important to get the name right (case et al), especially
> > > > in the logo :-)
> > > >
> > > > -Rahul
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?
Posted by Adonis Raduca <ad...@codebeat.ro>.
I think that is important to have a consistent naming strategy for all
myFaces (MyFaces) projects. For example I thought to one similar with the
Java naming convention for the instance variables.
Something like:
myFaces
tobago
tomahawk
…
I think that once the naming strategy will be in place must be respected
everywhere (logos, text stuff, etc.)
Adonis
On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Eh, I think that is total different beast.
> We all work here as individuals and it is ok to "misspell" names...
>
> But... starting to misspell the own project, is ... yes, confusing.
>
> -M
>
> On Dec 8, 2007 8:47 PM, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am not so sure if it is the same writing the official name of the
> > project (Apache MyFaces) that what we find in the (myFaceS). For
> > instance, most of the time we write in this list "Oracle" instead of
> > "ORACLE" (logo). I guess we should just choose which one is more
> > appealing to us, so just vote and let the outcome be our choice :)
> >
> > My 2 cents,
> >
> > Bruno
> >
> >
> > On 08/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > I too, and I think it is confusing, when we start to write it
> wrong......
> > > >
> > > <snip/>
> > >
> > > Indeed, its important to get the name right (case et al), especially
> > > in the logo :-)
> > >
> > > -Rahul
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
Eh, I think that is total different beast.
We all work here as individuals and it is ok to "misspell" names...
But... starting to misspell the own project, is ... yes, confusing.
-M
On Dec 8, 2007 8:47 PM, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am not so sure if it is the same writing the official name of the
> project (Apache MyFaces) that what we find in the (myFaceS). For
> instance, most of the time we write in this list "Oracle" instead of
> "ORACLE" (logo). I guess we should just choose which one is more
> appealing to us, so just vote and let the outcome be our choice :)
>
> My 2 cents,
>
> Bruno
>
>
> On 08/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > I too, and I think it is confusing, when we start to write it wrong......
> > >
> > <snip/>
> >
> > Indeed, its important to get the name right (case et al), especially
> > in the logo :-)
> >
> > -Rahul
> >
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?
Posted by Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>.
I am not so sure if it is the same writing the official name of the
project (Apache MyFaces) that what we find in the (myFaceS). For
instance, most of the time we write in this list "Oracle" instead of
"ORACLE" (logo). I guess we should just choose which one is more
appealing to us, so just vote and let the outcome be our choice :)
My 2 cents,
Bruno
On 08/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > I too, and I think it is confusing, when we start to write it wrong......
> >
> <snip/>
>
> Indeed, its important to get the name right (case et al), especially
> in the logo :-)
>
> -Rahul
>
Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?
Posted by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> I too, and I think it is confusing, when we start to write it wrong......
>
<snip/>
Indeed, its important to get the name right (case et al), especially
in the logo :-)
-Rahul
Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
I too, and I think it is confusing, when we start to write it wrong......
On Dec 8, 2007 8:05 PM, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I prefer the "M"
>
>
> On Dec 8, 2007 8:33 AM, Adonis Raduca <ad...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I look on all comments and I seen the majority agree with the MyFaces
> > capital "M" version. I know that many of us are familiar with MyFaces
> > version and I either. I propose the myFaces, small "m" from the
> > differentiation reasons. Now a days we are invaded with names like MySpace,
> > MyPortal, MyDocuments, MySomething, MyXxxx. All of them are written with
> > capital M, small y, after a word that starts with a capital letter. So I
> > tried to avoid this common pattern and provide myFaces with a distinctive
> > look, which stands out from the crowd … after all a brand means personality
> > …. we must be open minded ... :)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > What do you think ?
> >
> > Have a nice weekend !
> > Adonis
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?
Posted by Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>.
I prefer the "M"
On Dec 8, 2007 8:33 AM, Adonis Raduca <ad...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hello
>
>
>
>
>
> I look on all comments and I seen the majority agree with the MyFaces
> capital "M" version. I know that many of us are familiar with MyFaces
> version and I either. I propose the myFaces, small "m" from the
> differentiation reasons. Now a days we are invaded with names like MySpace,
> MyPortal, MyDocuments, MySomething, MyXxxx. All of them are written with
> capital M, small y, after a word that starts with a capital letter. So I
> tried to avoid this common pattern and provide myFaces with a distinctive
> look, which stands out from the crowd … after all a brand means personality
> …. we must be open minded ... :)
>
>
>
>
>
> What do you think ?
>
> Have a nice weekend !
> Adonis
>
>
> ________________________________
> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?
Posted by Stojan Peshov <go...@gmail.com>.
myFaces is the property
MyFaces is the class
:)
what do you wanna be
On Dec 10, 2007 4:36 PM, Barbalace, Richard <RB...@partners.org> wrote:
> I dislike the use of the lowercase m in the particular font used in the
> logo, because it makes the ambiguous F/f look lowercase as well. With the
> lowercase m, I see the logo as "myfaces" not "myFaces". With the capital M,
> I see it as "MyFaces". I would definitely rather read "MyFaces" than
> "myfaces", but feel less strongly about "myFaces". I think consistency
> across the project names is important though, so I slightly favor the
> capital M.
>
>
>
> Richard J. Barbalace
>
> Boston, MA, USA
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* Adonis Raduca [mailto:adonis_raduca@yahoo.com]
> *Sent:* Saturday, December 08, 2007 10:33 AM
> *To:* dev@myfaces.apache.org
> *Subject:* myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?
>
> Hello
>
>
> I look on all comments and I seen the majority agree with the MyFaces
> capital "M" version. I know that many of us are familiar with MyFaces
> version and I either. I propose the myFaces, small "m" from the
> differentiation reasons. Now a days we are invaded with names like MySpace,
> MyPortal, MyDocuments, MySomething, MyXxxx. All of them are written with
> capital M, small y, after a word that starts with a capital letter. So I
> tried to avoid this common pattern and provide myFaces with a distinctive
> look, which stands out from the crowd … after all a brand means personality
> …. we must be open minded ... :)
>
>
> What do you think ?
>
> Have a nice weekend !
> Adonis
>
> ------------------------------
> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51438/*http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs>
>
> The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended only
> for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential
> and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other
> use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or
> entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this
> information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at 800-856-1983 and
> properly dispose of this information.
>
>
>
>
RE: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?
Posted by "Barbalace, Richard" <RB...@PARTNERS.ORG>.
I dislike the use of the lowercase m in the particular font used in the logo,
because it makes the ambiguous F/f look lowercase as well. With the lowercase
m, I see the logo as "myfaces" not "myFaces". With the capital M, I see it as
"MyFaces". I would definitely rather read "MyFaces" than "myfaces", but feel
less strongly about "myFaces". I think consistency across the project names is
important though, so I slightly favor the capital M.
Richard J. Barbalace
Boston, MA, USA
-----Original Message-----
From: Adonis Raduca [mailto:adonis_raduca@yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2007 10:33 AM
To: dev@myfaces.apache.org
Subject: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?
Hello
I look on all comments and I seen the majority agree with the MyFaces
capital "M" version. I know that many of us are familiar with MyFaces version
and I either. I propose the myFaces, small "m" from the differentiation reasons.
Now a days we are invaded with names like MySpace, MyPortal, MyDocuments,
MySomething, MyXxxx. All of them are written with capital M, small y, after a
word that starts with a capital letter. So I tried to avoid this common pattern
and provide myFaces with a distinctive look, which stands out from the crowd ...
after all a brand means personality .... we must be open minded ... :)
What do you think ?
Have a nice weekend !
Adonis
________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51438/*http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs>
The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended only
for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other
use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this
information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at 800-856-1983 and
properly dispose of this information.