You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@apisix.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/10/26 07:23:12 UTC

[GitHub] [apisix] spacewander opened a new issue #2517: Use APISIX_WORKER_PROCESSES instead of APIX_WORKER_PROCESSES?

spacewander opened a new issue #2517:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/2517


   The former one is more compatible with the name of this project.
   CC @ShiningRush @membphis 


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [apisix] membphis commented on issue #2517: Use APISIX_WORKER_PROCESSES instead of APIX_WORKER_PROCESSES?

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
membphis commented on issue #2517:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/2517#issuecomment-717363041


   agree +1
   
   `APIX_WORKER_PROCESSES` is not easy to understand.
   
   `APIX` is very different from `APISIX`.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [apisix] juzhiyuan closed issue #2517: Use APISIX_WORKER_PROCESSES instead of APIX_WORKER_PROCESSES?

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
juzhiyuan closed issue #2517:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/2517


   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [apisix] Miss-you commented on issue #2517: Use APISIX_WORKER_PROCESSES instead of APIX_WORKER_PROCESSES?

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
Miss-you commented on issue #2517:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/2517#issuecomment-718878374


   I don't think environmental variables `APISIX_WORKER_PROCESSES` are a good idea.
   It makes sense to count the number of CPUs based on cgroup information.
   
   but, APISIX_WORKER_PROCESSES is better than APIX_WORKER_PROCESSES 


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [apisix] ShiningRush commented on issue #2517: Use APISIX_WORKER_PROCESSES instead of APIX_WORKER_PROCESSES?

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
ShiningRush commented on issue #2517:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/2517#issuecomment-717648246


   The prefix generally does not exceed four letters, such as `kubernetes -> kube`, `prometheus -> prom`, `grafana-> gf`.
   
   I think the prefix is ​​just a format, which doesn't have much meaning in itself. Whether it is `APIX` or `AX`, as long as the community defines it, the people who use it will always remember it.
   But if everyone thinks ʻAPISIX` is more suitable, six letters are also acceptable, although I rarely see such a long prefix


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [apisix] tokers commented on issue #2517: Use APISIX_WORKER_PROCESSES instead of APIX_WORKER_PROCESSES?

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
tokers commented on issue #2517:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/2517#issuecomment-717650893


   agree + 1
   
   We don't have to be limited by the number of letters, meanings first.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [apisix] moonming commented on issue #2517: Use APISIX_WORKER_PROCESSES instead of APIX_WORKER_PROCESSES?

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
moonming commented on issue #2517:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/2517#issuecomment-717574804


   > agree +1
   > 
   > 
   > 
   > `APIX_WORKER_PROCESSES` is not easy to understand.
   > 
   > 
   > 
   > `APIX` is very different from `APISIX`.
   
   +1. We should always use APISIX


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org