You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to legal-discuss@apache.org by Ralph Goers <Ra...@dslextreme.com> on 2008/03/01 05:02:13 UTC
Re: [Legal Wiki] Update of "3party" by SamRuby
Can we add something specifically about the LGPL and/or Hibernate. This
seems to come up as the most frequently asked question.
Apache Wiki wrote:
> Dear Wiki user,
>
> You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Legal Wiki" for change notification.
>
> The following page has been changed by SamRuby:
> http://wiki.apache.org/legal/3party
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> || <!> ||<:80% #FFFF00> '''''Draft''''' || <!> ||
>
> - Determining whether any given third party licensed work is compatible with the Apache License is not something that can unfailingly be determined algorithmically. Often the decision depends on the [:3party/context:context or the way the dependency is used]. Therefore, each PMC in conjunction with the [http://www.apache.org/legal/ ASF Legal Affairs Committee] is entrusted with the responsibility to make the decision as to whether or not a given dependency is acceptable. Additionally, each PMC is expected to inform the board via [http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#chair quarterly board reports] whenever there is a significant change in dependencies.
> + Determining whether any given third party licensed work is compatible with the Apache License is not something that can unfailingly be determined algorithmically. Often the decision depends on the [:3party/context:context or the way the dependency is used]. The PMC is in the best position to make that determination. Many times these issues are complex, or have been dealt with before in somewhat related contexts.
> +
> + Therefore, each PMC in conjunction with the [http://www.apache.org/legal/ ASF Legal Affairs Committee] is entrusted with the responsibility to make the decision as to whether or not a given dependency is acceptable. Additionally, each PMC is expected to inform the board via [http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#chair quarterly board reports] whenever there is a significant change in dependencies. This enables the board to provide a check and a balance when needed to ensure that principles are applied consistently across the foundation.
> +
> + This wiki contains summaries of, and links to, examples of how various PMCs are dealing with third-party licensing issues.
>
> = Principles =
> * All code developed at the ASF is [:3party/substantially:substantially licensed] under the [http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Apache License, Version 2.0]
> * Users of Apache products must be provided with all licensing terms applicable to any part of the product and must be given [:3party/notice:prominent notice] when any of those terms include restrictions significantly different from the Apache License.
>
> + || <!> ||<:80% #FFFF00> '''''Draft''''' || <!> ||
> +
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
> only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
> constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
> and policies of the ASF. See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
> official ASF policies and documents.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF. See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
Re: [Legal Wiki] Update of "3party" by SamRuby
Posted by Sam Ruby <ru...@apache.org>.
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Ralph Goers
<Ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> Can we add something specifically about the LGPL and/or Hibernate. This
> seems to come up as the most frequently asked question.
It is a wiki, go for it.
> Also, is there any reason not to add
> http://people.apache.org/~rubys/3party.html to the wiki?
It is a wiki, go for it.
- Sam Ruby
---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF. See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
Re: [Legal Wiki] Update of "3party" by SamRuby
Posted by Ralph Goers <Ra...@dslextreme.com>.
Also, is there any reason not to add
http://people.apache.org/~rubys/3party.html to the wiki?
Ralph Goers wrote:
> Can we add something specifically about the LGPL and/or Hibernate.
> This seems to come up as the most frequently asked question.
>
> Apache Wiki wrote:
>> Dear Wiki user,
>>
>> You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Legal Wiki"
>> for change notification.
>>
>> The following page has been changed by SamRuby:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/legal/3party
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> || <!> ||<:80% #FFFF00> '''''Draft''''' || <!> ||
>> - Determining whether any given third party licensed work is
>> compatible with the Apache License is not something that can
>> unfailingly be determined algorithmically. Often the decision
>> depends on the [:3party/context:context or the way the dependency is
>> used]. Therefore, each PMC in conjunction with the
>> [http://www.apache.org/legal/ ASF Legal Affairs Committee] is
>> entrusted with the responsibility to make the decision as to whether
>> or not a given dependency is acceptable. Additionally, each PMC is
>> expected to inform the board via
>> [http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#chair quarterly board reports]
>> whenever there is a significant change in dependencies.
>> + Determining whether any given third party licensed work is
>> compatible with the Apache License is not something that can
>> unfailingly be determined algorithmically. Often the decision
>> depends on the [:3party/context:context or the way the dependency is
>> used]. The PMC is in the best position to make that determination.
>> Many times these issues are complex, or have been dealt with before
>> in somewhat related contexts.
>> + + Therefore, each PMC in conjunction with the
>> [http://www.apache.org/legal/ ASF Legal Affairs Committee] is
>> entrusted with the responsibility to make the decision as to whether
>> or not a given dependency is acceptable. Additionally, each PMC is
>> expected to inform the board via
>> [http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#chair quarterly board reports]
>> whenever there is a significant change in dependencies. This enables
>> the board to provide a check and a balance when needed to ensure that
>> principles are applied consistently across the foundation.
>> + + This wiki contains summaries of, and links to, examples of how
>> various PMCs are dealing with third-party licensing issues.
>> = Principles =
>> * All code developed at the ASF is
>> [:3party/substantially:substantially licensed] under the
>> [http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Apache License, Version 2.0]
>> * Users of Apache products must be provided with all licensing
>> terms applicable to any part of the product and must be given
>> [:3party/notice:prominent notice] when any of those terms include
>> restrictions significantly different from the Apache License.
>> + || <!> ||<:80% #FFFF00> '''''Draft''''' || <!> ||
>> +
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
>> only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
>> constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
>> and policies of the ASF. See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
>> official ASF policies and documents.
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
> only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
> constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
> and policies of the ASF. See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
> official ASF policies and documents.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF. See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org