You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by Marcel Reutegger <mr...@adobe.com.INVALID> on 2017/09/20 13:40:47 UTC

Intent to backport OAK-6685

Hi,

I'd like to backport OAK-6685 to the maintenance branches. The fix is 
simple and I consider the risk as very low.

Regards
  Marcel

Re: Intent to backport OAK-6685

Posted by Matt Ryan <os...@mvryan.org>.

+1


On September 20, 2017 at 7:41:08 AM, Marcel Reutegger (
mreutegg@adobe.com.invalid) wrote:

Hi,

I'd like to backport OAK-6685 to the maintenance branches. The fix is
simple and I consider the risk as very low.

Regards
Marcel

Re: Intent to backport OAK-6685

Posted by Vikas Saurabh <vi...@gmail.com>.

+1 for backport.

I've added a comment to the issue that we should probably also make
background update a little more resilient.

Thanks,
Vikas

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Marcel Reutegger
<mr...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to backport OAK-6685 to the maintenance branches. The fix is simple
> and I consider the risk as very low.
>
> Regards
>  Marcel