You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@avro.apache.org by "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/12/04 01:58:11 UTC
[jira] Created: (AVRO-707) promote Sasl-based RPC
promote Sasl-based RPC
----------------------
Key: AVRO-707
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-707
Project: Avro
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: java
Reporter: Doug Cutting
Fix For: 1.5.0
SaslSocketTransceiver and SaslSocketServer should be preferred to SocketTransceiver and SocketServer. The former are more optimized and offer the option of security. The latter should be deprecated to discourage a proliferation of implementations.
We should also add Transceiver and Server factory methods that accept a URI. For "http:" URIs these should use HttpTransceiver and HttpServer. For "avro:" URIs these should use SaslSocketTransceiver and SaslSocketServer. The rpcsend and rpcrecieve tools should use these factories.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (AVRO-707) promote Sasl-based RPC
Posted by "Scott Carey (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12969604#action_12969604 ]
Scott Carey commented on AVRO-707:
----------------------------------
Patch looks good, but I can't test it at the moment.
> promote Sasl-based RPC
> ----------------------
>
> Key: AVRO-707
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-707
> Project: Avro
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: java
> Reporter: Doug Cutting
> Assignee: Doug Cutting
> Fix For: 1.5.0
>
> Attachments: AVRO-707.patch
>
>
> SaslSocketTransceiver and SaslSocketServer should be preferred to SocketTransceiver and SocketServer. The former are more optimized and offer the option of security. The latter should be deprecated to discourage a proliferation of implementations.
> We should also add Transceiver and Server factory methods that accept a URI. For "http:" URIs these should use HttpTransceiver and HttpServer. For "avro:" URIs these should use SaslSocketTransceiver and SaslSocketServer. The rpcsend and rpcrecieve tools should use these factories.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (AVRO-707) promote Sasl-based RPC
Posted by "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Doug Cutting updated AVRO-707:
------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed]
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
I committed this.
> promote Sasl-based RPC
> ----------------------
>
> Key: AVRO-707
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-707
> Project: Avro
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: java
> Reporter: Doug Cutting
> Assignee: Doug Cutting
> Fix For: 1.5.0
>
> Attachments: AVRO-707.patch
>
>
> SaslSocketTransceiver and SaslSocketServer should be preferred to SocketTransceiver and SocketServer. The former are more optimized and offer the option of security. The latter should be deprecated to discourage a proliferation of implementations.
> We should also add Transceiver and Server factory methods that accept a URI. For "http:" URIs these should use HttpTransceiver and HttpServer. For "avro:" URIs these should use SaslSocketTransceiver and SaslSocketServer. The rpcsend and rpcrecieve tools should use these factories.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (AVRO-707) promote Sasl-based RPC
Posted by "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Doug Cutting updated AVRO-707:
------------------------------
Attachment: AVRO-707.patch
Here's a patch for this. Change are:
- Two new static factory methods that understand "http:" and "avro:" URIs, using SaslSocket for "avro:":
-- Transceiver Ipc.createTransceiver(URI)
-- Server Ipc.createServer(Responder, URI)
- switches the rpcsend and rpcreceive tools to use the new factory methods
- deprecates SocketServer and SocketTransceiver in favor of SaslSocketServer and SaslSocketTransceiver
> promote Sasl-based RPC
> ----------------------
>
> Key: AVRO-707
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-707
> Project: Avro
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: java
> Reporter: Doug Cutting
> Fix For: 1.5.0
>
> Attachments: AVRO-707.patch
>
>
> SaslSocketTransceiver and SaslSocketServer should be preferred to SocketTransceiver and SocketServer. The former are more optimized and offer the option of security. The latter should be deprecated to discourage a proliferation of implementations.
> We should also add Transceiver and Server factory methods that accept a URI. For "http:" URIs these should use HttpTransceiver and HttpServer. For "avro:" URIs these should use SaslSocketTransceiver and SaslSocketServer. The rpcsend and rpcrecieve tools should use these factories.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (AVRO-707) promote Sasl-based RPC
Posted by "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Doug Cutting updated AVRO-707:
------------------------------
Assignee: Doug Cutting
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> promote Sasl-based RPC
> ----------------------
>
> Key: AVRO-707
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-707
> Project: Avro
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: java
> Reporter: Doug Cutting
> Assignee: Doug Cutting
> Fix For: 1.5.0
>
> Attachments: AVRO-707.patch
>
>
> SaslSocketTransceiver and SaslSocketServer should be preferred to SocketTransceiver and SocketServer. The former are more optimized and offer the option of security. The latter should be deprecated to discourage a proliferation of implementations.
> We should also add Transceiver and Server factory methods that accept a URI. For "http:" URIs these should use HttpTransceiver and HttpServer. For "avro:" URIs these should use SaslSocketTransceiver and SaslSocketServer. The rpcsend and rpcrecieve tools should use these factories.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.