You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Julian Reschke (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/09/01 17:14:46 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-2712) Possible null-dereference when calling ItemImpl#perform

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14725535#comment-14725535 ] 

Julian Reschke commented on OAK-2712:
-------------------------------------

[~anchela] I plan to backport this to 1.2 and potentially 1.0, because otherwise porting back other changes to NodeImpl and PropertyImpl will be a royal pain. WDYT?

> Possible null-dereference when calling ItemImpl#perform
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-2712
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2712
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: jcr
>            Reporter: angela
>            Assignee: angela
>              Labels: technical_debt
>             Fix For: 1.3.0
>
>
> FindBugs complains about usages of ItemImpl#perform that is annotated with {{@CheckForNull}} but callers expecting a non-null return value.... most prominently in NodeImpl



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)