You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by "Raymond Feng (JIRA)" <tu...@ws.apache.org> on 2007/07/16 06:53:04 UTC

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1110) Improve the performance of TypeHelperImpl.getType(Class)

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12512856 ] 

Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-1110:
---------------------------------------

Is there any plan to fix this before the SDO 1.0 release? It will have a big impact on the SDO Databinding for SCA.

Please see more discussions on http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200702.mbox/%3C00c401c75796$c0afdc10$0300a8c0@rfengt60p%3E.

Thanks,
Raymond

> Improve the performance of TypeHelperImpl.getType(Class)
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TUSCANY-1110
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1110
>             Project: Tuscany
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Java SDO Implementation
>    Affects Versions: Java-SDO-Next
>            Reporter: Raymond Feng
>             Fix For: Java-SDO-Next
>
>
> In the SDO databinding for SCA, we need to introspect a java class/interface to figure out the corresponding SDO type. Looking into the code, there is a TODO comment:
> //TODO more efficient implementation ... this is a really bad one!
> Do you plan to provide a more efficient impl :-)?
> Thanks,
> Raymond

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org