You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Jorge Schrauwen <jo...@gmail.com> on 2006/07/23 00:36:00 UTC

What happend to mpm_winxp?

Just wondering what happend to this?

-- 
~Jorge

Re: What happend to mpm_winxp?

Posted by Jorge Schrauwen <jo...@gmail.com>.
Ok i coudl'nt get it to work:

1) the dsp file was incompatible with 2.2.x... ok no big deal I rewrote the
new one by hand.
2) lots of code errors! APR incompatible??... big deal since i can't debug
or write c :/

The errors all seem to be related to APR functions.

On 7/23/06, Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
> >> i was talking about:
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200408.mbox/%3C4129D4AD.4090605@apache.org%3E
> >
> >
> > Just goes to show how things slip past people's radars when they have
> other
> > things going on, and really there are only two or three dev@'ers who
> would
> > have been in a position to review that code :)
> >
>
> Right, It was probably my fault, since I've create that, and never
> done some actual performance compare.
> Anyhow the code can be found at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~mturk/
>
> Regards,
> Mladen.
>



-- 
~Jorge

Re: What happend to mpm_winxp?

Posted by Jorge Schrauwen <jo...@gmail.com>.
Cool, I'll give it a shot... hopefully it will work on 2.2.2 aswel...

If i get it to compiled... what kind of data would you be interested in?

On 7/23/06, Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
> >> i was talking about:
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200408.mbox/%3C4129D4AD.4090605@apache.org%3E
> >
> >
> > Just goes to show how things slip past people's radars when they have
> other
> > things going on, and really there are only two or three dev@'ers who
> would
> > have been in a position to review that code :)
> >
>
> Right, It was probably my fault, since I've create that, and never
> done some actual performance compare.
> Anyhow the code can be found at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~mturk/
>
> Regards,
> Mladen.
>



-- 
~Jorge

Re: What happend to mpm_winxp?

Posted by Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org>.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
>> i was talking about:
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200408.mbox/%3C4129D4AD.4090605@apache.org%3E 
> 
> 
> Just goes to show how things slip past people's radars when they have other
> things going on, and really there are only two or three dev@'ers who would
> have been in a position to review that code :)
>

Right, It was probably my fault, since I've create that, and never
done some actual performance compare.
Anyhow the code can be found at:

http://people.apache.org/~mturk/

Regards,
Mladen.

Re: What happend to mpm_winxp?

Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
> i was talking about:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200408.mbox/%3C4129D4AD.4090605@apache.org%3E 

Just goes to show how things slip past people's radars when they have other
things going on, and really there are only two or three dev@'ers who would
have been in a position to review that code :)

And of course, since it didn't follow submission proposals (show us the
minimum patch to accomplish something, not a whole file set to unzip which
most on a unix mailreaders won't waste time to do) .. well, not a big
surprise that between not-reviewable and busy people it got no response.

I took a quick look and Mladen hasn't updated it, sometimes it's best to ask
the original author what's cooking since their post, but next time please do
toss in a pointer to the forgotten incident you want to raise.

As he's a committer here, I'm sure Mladen would be happy to reply.  I remember
looking at this, myself, and having alot of concerns about concurrency between
logging a few other shared resources.  We actually need a better API for the
generic module to be able to use shared resources on win32 as simply as on unix.
Shared handles without fork are a pita, and we special cased these rather than
solving the problem when we attacked the winnt mpm.

Bill



Re: What happend to mpm_winxp?

Posted by Jorge Schrauwen <jo...@gmail.com>.
i was talking about:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200408.mbox/%3C4129D4AD.4090605@apache.org%3E

On 7/23/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
> > Just wondering what happend to this?
>
> No clue what you are asking about.  Perhaps you are thinking of the
> idea of an mpm_winhttp, using the WinHTTP API (which handles the
> request/response in the WinXP HTTP stack and then dispatches between
> multiple hosts and uri's that are registered with this API)?
>
>


-- 
~Jorge

Re: What happend to mpm_winxp?

Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
> Just wondering what happend to this?

No clue what you are asking about.  Perhaps you are thinking of the
idea of an mpm_winhttp, using the WinHTTP API (which handles the
request/response in the WinXP HTTP stack and then dispatches between
multiple hosts and uri's that are registered with this API)?