[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7249) LatLonPoint polygon should use tree relate()

["Ryan Ernst (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15254411#comment-15254411 ] 

Ryan Ernst commented on LUCENE-7249:
------------------------------------

Real polygons are starting to move! +1

> LatLonPoint polygon should use tree relate()
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-7249
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7249
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>         Attachments: LUCENE-7249.patch
>
>
> Built and tested this method on LUCENE-7239 but forgot to actually cut the code over to use it.
> Using our tree relation methods speeds up BKD traversal. It is not important for tiny polygons but matters as complexity increases:
> Synthetic polygons from luceneUtil
> ||vertices||old QPS||new QPS|
> |5|40.9|40.5|
> |50|33.0|33.1|
> |500|31.5|31.9|
> |5000|24.6|29.4|
> |50000|7.0|20.4|
> Real polygons (33 london districts: http://data.london.gov.uk/2011-boundary-files)
> ||vertices||old QPS||new QPS|
> |avg 5.6k|84.3|113.8|



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org