You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> on 2007/08/27 21:17:41 UTC
Re: svn commit: r570074 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
rpluem@apache.org wrote:
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS?rev=570074&r1=570073&r2=570074&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS Mon Aug 27 04:28:22 2007
> @@ -165,6 +165,10 @@
> adjusted for 2.0 including both patches;
> http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/r568779-backport-2.0-r2.patch
> +1: wrowe
> + rpluem says: What is the reason for the patch to Makefile.in in your
> + proposal? Besides I think
> + sed 's#i^LIBTOOL = \(.*\)#LIBTOOL = $(SHELL) $(installbuilddir)/libtool $(LTFLAGS)#'
> + is wrong (Note the i before ^).
> and prior to r569934;
> +1: rpluem
Yes, I'm a vim user who always forgets modern linux is happy to navigate and
stay in insert mode ;-) That file will not be applied, please ignore (it's
the proposed fix to solve vpath with external apr junk.)
> @@ -175,6 +179,9 @@
> Backported to 2.0 (on top of log core patch, above);
> http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/r569535-backport-2.0.patch
> +1: wrowe
> + -1: rpluem: It does not apply to 2.0. Even if
> + http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/r568326-backport-2.0-r2.patch
> + is applied first.
Reviewing, and will update, thank you.
Re: svn commit: r570074 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> On 08/27/2007 09:17 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> Yes, I'm a vim user who always forgets modern linux is happy to navigate and
>> stay in insert mode ;-) That file will not be applied, please ignore (it's
>
> I thought just that ;-). Happened to me hundred times before. Especially if you
> work alternately with vi on Solaris and vi (aka vim) on Linux.
Worse, vi on hpux where you have to cancel insert mode to avoid lots of extra
spurious commands on arrow keys.
Re: svn commit: r570074 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
Posted by Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org>.
On 08/27/2007 09:17 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> rpluem@apache.org wrote:
>> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS?rev=570074&r1=570073&r2=570074&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS (original)
>> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS Mon Aug 27 04:28:22 2007
>> @@ -165,6 +165,10 @@
>> adjusted for 2.0 including both patches;
>> http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/r568779-backport-2.0-r2.patch
>> +1: wrowe
>> + rpluem says: What is the reason for the patch to Makefile.in in your
>> + proposal? Besides I think
>> + sed 's#i^LIBTOOL = \(.*\)#LIBTOOL = $(SHELL) $(installbuilddir)/libtool $(LTFLAGS)#'
>> + is wrong (Note the i before ^).
>> and prior to r569934;
>> +1: rpluem
>
> Yes, I'm a vim user who always forgets modern linux is happy to navigate and
> stay in insert mode ;-) That file will not be applied, please ignore (it's
I thought just that ;-). Happened to me hundred times before. Especially if you
work alternately with vi on Solaris and vi (aka vim) on Linux.
Regards
Rüdiger