You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to qa@openoffice.apache.org by Javier LoRa <xa...@hotmail.com> on 2013/02/07 03:23:13 UTC
FW: Bugs... finished
From: xavi_dandy@hotmail.com
To: qa@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Bugs... finished
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 19:23:02 -0600
Hello Rob.
I finished the assigned bugs and I need more to continue working.
I remind you, my platform is: W7 64bits AOO 3.4.1
Good afternoon.
Javier Lopez
Re: FW: Bugs... finished
Posted by Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Javier LoRa <xa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> From: xavi_dandy@hotmail.com
> To: qa@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Bugs... finished
> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 19:23:02 -0600
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello Rob.
> I finished the assigned bugs and I need more to continue working.
> I remind you, my platform is: W7 64bits AOO 3.4.1
Hello Javier,
I've updated the New Volunteer Introduce to QA page today. The
original version was missing some detail about confirming defect
reports, and I hope my new version is much clearer.
You can see the new version here:
http://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/intro-qa.html
Please look especially at the section called "Easy QA Task: Confirm
New Defect Reports".
I did review your assigned bugs, and see that you've done some good
work. But we need to find a way to get these reports out of the
UNCONFIRMED state and move them to either CONFIRMED,
RESOLVED/IRREPRODUCIBLE, RESOLVED/INVALID or RESOLVED/DUPLICATE. They
should not stay as UNCONFIRMED unless we are waiting for *specific*
information from the user. And in those cases the Keyword field
should be set to "needsmoreinfo".
So please, take a look at the update webpage and take another look at
your UNCONFIRMED reports. I think most of them can be resolved, in
one way or another.
If you have any questions then we can discuss on the mailing list.
Thanks!
-Rob
> Good afternoon.
> Javier Lopez