You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cayenne.apache.org by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> on 2008/04/23 09:35:07 UTC
M4?
I think M4 is long overdue. Just these two issues warrant a release -
CAY-984, CAY-999, and we have so much more. I still hope to squeeze a
few more bug fixes in it, but I feel like we need to release the next
milestone rather sooner than later.
Andrus
Re: M4?
Posted by Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com>.
I don't leave for another week and a half. I've just been busy with
the whole prep thing. Doing the Windows assembly stuff would be a
welcome break ;-)
Once I leave for the trip, I can assure you won't hear from me :-P
--
Kevin
On Apr 23, 2008, at 9:06 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> C'mon, you should be enjoying yourself during that time :-) Although
> to some working on Cayenne is a form of enjoyment :-)
>
> Anyways, please don't feel obligated to work on the release during
> your vacation time. We'll just have to pay attention to the windows
> assembly process.
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On Apr 23, 2008, at 3:56 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
>
>> I agree. I just haven't been in a position to lead up the release
>> this time. I'll likely be on my honeymoon during the vote in fact.
>>
>> I will try to squeeze the maven magic for making ZIP assemblies for
>> Windows though.
>>
>> --
>> Kevin
>>
>> On Apr 23, 2008, at 3:35 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>
>>> I think M4 is long overdue. Just these two issues warrant a
>>> release - CAY-984, CAY-999, and we have so much more. I still hope
>>> to squeeze a few more bug fixes in it, but I feel like we need to
>>> release the next milestone rather sooner than later.
>>>
>>> Andrus
>>
>>
>
Re: M4?
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
C'mon, you should be enjoying yourself during that time :-) Although
to some working on Cayenne is a form of enjoyment :-)
Anyways, please don't feel obligated to work on the release during
your vacation time. We'll just have to pay attention to the windows
assembly process.
Andrus
On Apr 23, 2008, at 3:56 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> I agree. I just haven't been in a position to lead up the release
> this time. I'll likely be on my honeymoon during the vote in fact.
>
> I will try to squeeze the maven magic for making ZIP assemblies for
> Windows though.
>
> --
> Kevin
>
> On Apr 23, 2008, at 3:35 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>> I think M4 is long overdue. Just these two issues warrant a release
>> - CAY-984, CAY-999, and we have so much more. I still hope to
>> squeeze a few more bug fixes in it, but I feel like we need to
>> release the next milestone rather sooner than later.
>>
>> Andrus
>
>
Re: M4?
Posted by Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com>.
I agree. I just haven't been in a position to lead up the release
this time. I'll likely be on my honeymoon during the vote in fact.
I will try to squeeze the maven magic for making ZIP assemblies for
Windows though.
--
Kevin
On Apr 23, 2008, at 3:35 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> I think M4 is long overdue. Just these two issues warrant a release
> - CAY-984, CAY-999, and we have so much more. I still hope to
> squeeze a few more bug fixes in it, but I feel like we need to
> release the next milestone rather sooner than later.
>
> Andrus
Re: M4?
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
On May 13, 2008, at 11:25 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> Also, remember that Hudson is running the tests only against Cayenne
> trunk so any fixes which go into M4 don't get the tests run
> automatically against them.
In a way they will be as all fixes against M4 must be manually
duplicated on the trunk.
Andrus
Re: M4?
Posted by Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@ish.com.au>.
On 14/05/2008, at 12:53 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Finally the release is tagged.
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/main/tags/3.0M4/cayenne/
>
> So now the testing can begin without regard to the future trunk
> changes...
Well, this is good timing for me to update our commercial project with
this release, so I'll be able to give it a good workout within our
product over the next 2 weeks, both here in QA testing and in a
limited client beta.
Also, remember that Hudson is running the tests only against Cayenne
trunk so any fixes which go into M4 don't get the tests run
automatically against them.
Ari
-------------------------->
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
Re: M4?
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Finally the release is tagged.
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/main/tags/3.0M4/cayenne/
So now the testing can begin without regard to the future trunk
changes...
Andrus
On May 6, 2008, at 5:14 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Phew... just finished all the split/outer join tasks. This allowed
> me to close a whole bunch of related Jiras, so hopefully the new
> release will make a bunch of users happy. I have a few smaller
> things before we can tag the release. I guess I can take care of
> CAY-1046 task that Kevin opened - it is fairly straightforward and
> we won't have to wait till he comes back from vacation to post the
> release.
>
> In the meantime I encourage everyone to try the new split/outer join
> stuff and let me know if things don't work as expected (or not very
> usable for whatever reason).
>
> Andrus
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 28, 2008, at 9:55 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>> There is still no write SVN access, so we can't tag the release and
>> will have to wait. There was a RAID failure and now while the
>> replacement machine is being setup, all access is read-only.
>>
>> And as it often happens, I started on a big new development on the
>> eve of the release (CAY-929, CAY-560). And I honestly didn't mean
>> to include that in M4 (i.e. the plan was to wait with this commit
>> till after we tag the release)... But if I finish it during the SVN
>> downtime, we might as well put it in the release.
>>
>> CAY-929 (the modern join syntax for SelectQuery) is already
>> finished and now I am adding the OUTER join semantics to
>> expressions. I am not used to keep so many unrelated changes
>> uncommitted and without multiple clear rollback points, but I guess
>> I'll survive it that time...
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 24, 2008, at 6:13 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
>>
>>> +1 to M4. I'll be happy to help with putting the release together.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Tore Halset <ha...@pvv.ntnu.no>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Agree. I will be able to join in after 2000 CET or 1800 UTC
>>>> almost every
>>>> day.
>>>>
>>>> - Tore.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 23. april. 2008, at 09.35, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I think M4 is long overdue. Just these two issues warrant a
>>>>> release -
>>>> CAY-984, CAY-999, and we have so much more. I still hope to
>>>> squeeze a few
>>>> more bug fixes in it, but I feel like we need to release the next
>>>> milestone
>>>> rather sooner than later.
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: M4?
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Phew... just finished all the split/outer join tasks. This allowed me
to close a whole bunch of related Jiras, so hopefully the new release
will make a bunch of users happy. I have a few smaller things before
we can tag the release. I guess I can take care of CAY-1046 task that
Kevin opened - it is fairly straightforward and we won't have to wait
till he comes back from vacation to post the release.
In the meantime I encourage everyone to try the new split/outer join
stuff and let me know if things don't work as expected (or not very
usable for whatever reason).
Andrus
On Apr 28, 2008, at 9:55 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> There is still no write SVN access, so we can't tag the release and
> will have to wait. There was a RAID failure and now while the
> replacement machine is being setup, all access is read-only.
>
> And as it often happens, I started on a big new development on the
> eve of the release (CAY-929, CAY-560). And I honestly didn't mean to
> include that in M4 (i.e. the plan was to wait with this commit till
> after we tag the release)... But if I finish it during the SVN
> downtime, we might as well put it in the release.
>
> CAY-929 (the modern join syntax for SelectQuery) is already finished
> and now I am adding the OUTER join semantics to expressions. I am
> not used to keep so many unrelated changes uncommitted and without
> multiple clear rollback points, but I guess I'll survive it that
> time...
>
> Andrus
>
>
>
> On Apr 24, 2008, at 6:13 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
>
>> +1 to M4. I'll be happy to help with putting the release together.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Tore Halset <ha...@pvv.ntnu.no>
>> wrote:
>>> Agree. I will be able to join in after 2000 CET or 1800 UTC almost
>>> every
>>> day.
>>>
>>> - Tore.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 23. april. 2008, at 09.35, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I think M4 is long overdue. Just these two issues warrant a
>>>> release -
>>> CAY-984, CAY-999, and we have so much more. I still hope to
>>> squeeze a few
>>> more bug fixes in it, but I feel like we need to release the next
>>> milestone
>>> rather sooner than later.
>>>>
>>>> Andrus
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Re: M4?
Posted by Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com>.
Without starting an IDE war, you might want to check out IDEA. It has a
feature for shelving changes, which I've found incredibly useful in the
absence of local commits. It basically creates a patch of a changeset that
it manages internally and can reapply at any time. While it sounds simple
enough, it's done very well and has saved me a lot of hassle.
--
Kevin
On 4/28/08 2:55 PM, "Andrus Adamchik" <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> There is still no write SVN access, so we can't tag the release and
> will have to wait. There was a RAID failure and now while the
> replacement machine is being setup, all access is read-only.
>
> And as it often happens, I started on a big new development on the eve
> of the release (CAY-929, CAY-560). And I honestly didn't mean to
> include that in M4 (i.e. the plan was to wait with this commit till
> after we tag the release)... But if I finish it during the SVN
> downtime, we might as well put it in the release.
>
> CAY-929 (the modern join syntax for SelectQuery) is already finished
> and now I am adding the OUTER join semantics to expressions. I am not
> used to keep so many unrelated changes uncommitted and without
> multiple clear rollback points, but I guess I'll survive it that time...
Re: M4?
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
There is still no write SVN access, so we can't tag the release and
will have to wait. There was a RAID failure and now while the
replacement machine is being setup, all access is read-only.
And as it often happens, I started on a big new development on the eve
of the release (CAY-929, CAY-560). And I honestly didn't mean to
include that in M4 (i.e. the plan was to wait with this commit till
after we tag the release)... But if I finish it during the SVN
downtime, we might as well put it in the release.
CAY-929 (the modern join syntax for SelectQuery) is already finished
and now I am adding the OUTER join semantics to expressions. I am not
used to keep so many unrelated changes uncommitted and without
multiple clear rollback points, but I guess I'll survive it that time...
Andrus
On Apr 24, 2008, at 6:13 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
> +1 to M4. I'll be happy to help with putting the release together.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Tore Halset <ha...@pvv.ntnu.no>
> wrote:
>> Agree. I will be able to join in after 2000 CET or 1800 UTC almost
>> every
>> day.
>>
>> - Tore.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 23. april. 2008, at 09.35, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I think M4 is long overdue. Just these two issues warrant a
>>> release -
>> CAY-984, CAY-999, and we have so much more. I still hope to squeeze
>> a few
>> more bug fixes in it, but I feel like we need to release the next
>> milestone
>> rather sooner than later.
>>>
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: M4?
Posted by Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com>.
+1 to M4. I'll be happy to help with putting the release together.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Tore Halset <ha...@pvv.ntnu.no> wrote:
> Agree. I will be able to join in after 2000 CET or 1800 UTC almost every
> day.
>
> - Tore.
>
>
>
> On 23. april. 2008, at 09.35, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>
> > I think M4 is long overdue. Just these two issues warrant a release -
> CAY-984, CAY-999, and we have so much more. I still hope to squeeze a few
> more bug fixes in it, but I feel like we need to release the next milestone
> rather sooner than later.
> >
> > Andrus
> >
> >
>
>
Re: M4?
Posted by Tore Halset <ha...@pvv.ntnu.no>.
Agree. I will be able to join in after 2000 CET or 1800 UTC almost
every day.
- Tore.
On 23. april. 2008, at 09.35, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> I think M4 is long overdue. Just these two issues warrant a release
> - CAY-984, CAY-999, and we have so much more. I still hope to
> squeeze a few more bug fixes in it, but I feel like we need to
> release the next milestone rather sooner than later.
>
> Andrus
>