You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to adffaces-dev@incubator.apache.org by Khaled TLILI <kt...@jahia.com> on 2007/04/25 09:27:26 UTC

Trinidad + portletJSR168

Hi,

I am developping a portletJSR168 and I want to use the treeTable component.

Is Trinidad compliant with portletJSR168?

if yes, is there an example of portlet using trinidad?

Wich jsf bridge to use (org.apache.portals.bridges.jsf.FacesPortlet or 
org.apache.myfaces.portlet.MyFacesGenericPortlet)?

Thanks for your answers.

KT,

Re: Trinidad + portletJSR168

Posted by Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>.

Khaled,

Much work has been done on Trinidad in a portal environment but we are 
not there yet.  Trinidad is a very complex renderkit with a lot of 
functionality and the existing bridges are deficient to varying 
degrees.  Currently Trinidad will run in a Proof of Concept using the 
Oracle Bridge but I suspect that Trinidad will not be fully compatible 
with an OpenSource bridge until the completion of JSR-301.

Scott

Khaled TLILI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am developping a portletJSR168 and I want to use the treeTable 
> component.
>
> Is Trinidad compliant with portletJSR168?
>
> if yes, is there an example of portlet using trinidad?
>
> Wich jsf bridge to use (org.apache.portals.bridges.jsf.FacesPortlet or 
> org.apache.myfaces.portlet.MyFacesGenericPortlet)?
>
> Thanks for your answers.
>
> KT,
>