You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to notifications@ofbiz.apache.org by "Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/04/26 18:21:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-10955) field type Integer is missing in definitions

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16827190#comment-16827190 ] 

Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-10955:
-----------------------------------------

Hi Pierre, 

There is a typo in your patch:"INTEGEr".

Moreover, should we define all possible types: https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/sql/Types.html ? I wonder why only BigInt was defined "initially"

> field type Integer is missing in definitions
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFBIZ-10955
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10955
>             Project: OFBiz
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: framework
>    Affects Versions: Trunk, Release Branch 16.11, Release Branch 17.12, Release Branch 18.12
>            Reporter: Pierre Smits
>            Assignee: Pierre Smits
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: OFBIZ-10955.patch
>
>
> The field type for integer values is missing in definitions for various RDBMS variants



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)