You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Michael Schmalle <ap...@teotigraphix.com> on 2012/12/06 19:40:29 UTC
[FalconJS] changing to base.js was: (Re: [Falcon] Unit tests
failing)
Well considering I know exactly what the task is.
I will warn you, as I have said previously I am green when it comes to
complex build scripts, that is eomthing you will have to do.
I think my task is right now to get the output inline with what Erik
is proposing. Does this sound correct?
Mike
Quoting Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
> OK, I am assuming you will complete this task?
>
>
> On 12/6/12 10:21 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <ap...@teotigraphix.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Ok, that was an idiot question, I just answered my own with a cliche
>> "google search"
>>
>> base.js is what the closure compiler uses and exactly what I just
>> switched to. :)
>>
>> Yeah, I'm smart...
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> Quoting Michael Schmalle <ap...@teotigraphix.com>:
>>
>>>
>>> Quoting Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>>>
>>>> I just fixed another issue when you don't copy the SDK.
>>>>
>>>> I am running unit tests from a command shell on MacOSX. All the
>>>> tests run
>>>> by the default ant target pass for me.
>>>>
>>>> I am about to embark on switching the output to base.js.
>>>
>>> What does this exactly mean? Changing code in the JSEmitter? I just
>>> spent 4-5 hours looking at the output and debugging it with break
>>> points. The JSEmitter is only about 1/3 of the emitting logic.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
>>> http://www.teotigraphix.com
>>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
>
--
Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
http://www.teotigraphix.com
http://blog.teotigraphix.com
Re: [FalconJS] changing to base.js was: (Re: [Falcon] Unit tests
failing)
Posted by Michael Schmalle <ap...@teotigraphix.com>.
Ok,
I didn't get that far.
I'll look at the code and README over there now.
Mike
Quoting Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>:
> Well, I did put some effort into writing the README in the publisher dir in
> the develop branch of asjs.
>
> Once I have access I'll elaborate further on the Wiki.
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Thursday, December 6, 2012, Michael Schmalle wrote:
>
>>
>> Someone needs to give Erik WIKI permissions to edit so he can get up a
>> simple outline of what he is working on and how it works.
>>
>> For all of us that are still learning this stuff.
>>
>> Erik, it would be nice of you to tell us how to setup a project and get it
>> working as well so I can test my output against something using the
>> publisher.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> Quoting Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/6/12 10:40 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <ap...@teotigraphix.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Well considering I know exactly what the task is.
>>>>
>>>> I will warn you, as I have said previously I am green when it comes to
>>>> complex build scripts, that is eomthing you will have to do.
>>>>
>>>> I think my task is right now to get the output inline with what Erik
>>>> is proposing. Does this sound correct?
>>>>
>>> Yes, but after that, the publisher still has to work. I haven't looked at
>>> it, but when manually "publishing" the prototype example, it involved
>>> copying the adobe.js file. If the new solution involves having a base.js
>>> handy, I think we need to download it instead of checking it into our
>>> repo.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Quoting Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>>>>
>>>> OK, I am assuming you will complete this task?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/6/12 10:21 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <ap...@teotigraphix.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok, that was an idiot question, I just answered my own with a cliche
>>>>>> "google search"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> base.js is what the closure compiler uses and exactly what I just
>>>>>> switched to. :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, I'm smart...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Quoting Michael Schmalle <ap...@teotigraphix.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Quoting Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just fixed another issue when you don't copy the SDK.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am running unit tests from a command shell on MacOSX. All the
>>>>>>>> tests run
>>>>>>>> by the default ant target pass for me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am about to embark on switching the output to base.js.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What does this exactly mean? Changing code in the JSEmitter? I just
>>>>>>> spent 4-5 hours looking at the output and debugging it with break
>>>>>>> points. The JSEmitter is only about 1/3 of the emitting logic.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
>>>>>>> http://www.teotigraphix.com
>>>>>>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Alex Harui
>>>>> Flex SDK Team
>>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> --
>>> Alex Harui
>>> Flex SDK Team
>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
>> http://www.teotigraphix.com
>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com
>>
>>
>
> --
> Ix Multimedia Software
>
> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> 3521 VB Utrecht
>
> T. 06-51952295
> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>
--
Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
http://www.teotigraphix.com
http://blog.teotigraphix.com
Re: [FalconJS] changing to base.js was: (Re: [Falcon] Unit tests failing)
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
Well, I did put some effort into writing the README in the publisher dir in
the develop branch of asjs.
Once I have access I'll elaborate further on the Wiki.
EdB
On Thursday, December 6, 2012, Michael Schmalle wrote:
>
> Someone needs to give Erik WIKI permissions to edit so he can get up a
> simple outline of what he is working on and how it works.
>
> For all of us that are still learning this stuff.
>
> Erik, it would be nice of you to tell us how to setup a project and get it
> working as well so I can test my output against something using the
> publisher.
>
> Mike
>
> Quoting Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>
>
>>
>>
>> On 12/6/12 10:40 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <ap...@teotigraphix.com> wrote:
>>
>> Well considering I know exactly what the task is.
>>>
>>> I will warn you, as I have said previously I am green when it comes to
>>> complex build scripts, that is eomthing you will have to do.
>>>
>>> I think my task is right now to get the output inline with what Erik
>>> is proposing. Does this sound correct?
>>>
>> Yes, but after that, the publisher still has to work. I haven't looked at
>> it, but when manually "publishing" the prototype example, it involved
>> copying the adobe.js file. If the new solution involves having a base.js
>> handy, I think we need to download it instead of checking it into our
>> repo.
>>
>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>
>>> Quoting Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>>>
>>> OK, I am assuming you will complete this task?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/6/12 10:21 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <ap...@teotigraphix.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Ok, that was an idiot question, I just answered my own with a cliche
>>>>> "google search"
>>>>>
>>>>> base.js is what the closure compiler uses and exactly what I just
>>>>> switched to. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, I'm smart...
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike
>>>>>
>>>>> Quoting Michael Schmalle <ap...@teotigraphix.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Quoting Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just fixed another issue when you don't copy the SDK.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am running unit tests from a command shell on MacOSX. All the
>>>>>>> tests run
>>>>>>> by the default ant target pass for me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am about to embark on switching the output to base.js.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What does this exactly mean? Changing code in the JSEmitter? I just
>>>>>> spent 4-5 hours looking at the output and debugging it with break
>>>>>> points. The JSEmitter is only about 1/3 of the emitting logic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
>>>>>> http://www.teotigraphix.com
>>>>>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Alex Harui
>>>> Flex SDK Team
>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> --
>> Alex Harui
>> Flex SDK Team
>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
> http://www.teotigraphix.com
> http://blog.teotigraphix.com
>
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: [FalconJS] changing to base.js was: (Re: [Falcon] Unit tests
failing)
Posted by Michael Schmalle <ap...@teotigraphix.com>.
Someone needs to give Erik WIKI permissions to edit so he can get up a
simple outline of what he is working on and how it works.
For all of us that are still learning this stuff.
Erik, it would be nice of you to tell us how to setup a project and
get it working as well so I can test my output against something using
the publisher.
Mike
Quoting Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>
>
>
> On 12/6/12 10:40 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <ap...@teotigraphix.com> wrote:
>
>> Well considering I know exactly what the task is.
>>
>> I will warn you, as I have said previously I am green when it comes to
>> complex build scripts, that is eomthing you will have to do.
>>
>> I think my task is right now to get the output inline with what Erik
>> is proposing. Does this sound correct?
> Yes, but after that, the publisher still has to work. I haven't looked at
> it, but when manually "publishing" the prototype example, it involved
> copying the adobe.js file. If the new solution involves having a base.js
> handy, I think we need to download it instead of checking it into our repo.
>
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> Quoting Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>>
>>> OK, I am assuming you will complete this task?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/6/12 10:21 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <ap...@teotigraphix.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ok, that was an idiot question, I just answered my own with a cliche
>>>> "google search"
>>>>
>>>> base.js is what the closure compiler uses and exactly what I just
>>>> switched to. :)
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, I'm smart...
>>>>
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>> Quoting Michael Schmalle <ap...@teotigraphix.com>:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Quoting Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I just fixed another issue when you don't copy the SDK.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am running unit tests from a command shell on MacOSX. All the
>>>>>> tests run
>>>>>> by the default ant target pass for me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am about to embark on switching the output to base.js.
>>>>>
>>>>> What does this exactly mean? Changing code in the JSEmitter? I just
>>>>> spent 4-5 hours looking at the output and debugging it with break
>>>>> points. The JSEmitter is only about 1/3 of the emitting logic.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
>>>>> http://www.teotigraphix.com
>>>>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alex Harui
>>> Flex SDK Team
>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
>
--
Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
http://www.teotigraphix.com
http://blog.teotigraphix.com
Re: [FalconJS] changing to base.js was: (Re: [Falcon] Unit tests
failing)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 12/6/12 10:40 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <ap...@teotigraphix.com> wrote:
> Well considering I know exactly what the task is.
>
> I will warn you, as I have said previously I am green when it comes to
> complex build scripts, that is eomthing you will have to do.
>
> I think my task is right now to get the output inline with what Erik
> is proposing. Does this sound correct?
Yes, but after that, the publisher still has to work. I haven't looked at
it, but when manually "publishing" the prototype example, it involved
copying the adobe.js file. If the new solution involves having a base.js
handy, I think we need to download it instead of checking it into our repo.
>
> Mike
>
>
> Quoting Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>
>> OK, I am assuming you will complete this task?
>>
>>
>> On 12/6/12 10:21 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <ap...@teotigraphix.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Ok, that was an idiot question, I just answered my own with a cliche
>>> "google search"
>>>
>>> base.js is what the closure compiler uses and exactly what I just
>>> switched to. :)
>>>
>>> Yeah, I'm smart...
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> Quoting Michael Schmalle <ap...@teotigraphix.com>:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Quoting Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> I just fixed another issue when you don't copy the SDK.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am running unit tests from a command shell on MacOSX. All the
>>>>> tests run
>>>>> by the default ant target pass for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am about to embark on switching the output to base.js.
>>>>
>>>> What does this exactly mean? Changing code in the JSEmitter? I just
>>>> spent 4-5 hours looking at the output and debugging it with break
>>>> points. The JSEmitter is only about 1/3 of the emitting logic.
>>>>
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
>>>> http://www.teotigraphix.com
>>>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Alex Harui
>> Flex SDK Team
>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>
>>
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui