You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by David Jones <dj...@ena.com> on 2017/10/26 18:33:14 UTC
Re: Ruleset updates via nightly masscheck status
On 10/26/2017 01:09 PM, David Jones wrote:
> On 10/25/2017 06:15 AM, David Jones wrote:
>> cd /tmp
>> wget http://sa-update.ena.com/1813149.tar.gz
>> wget http://sa-update.ena.com/1813149.tar.gz.sha1
>> wget http://sa-update.ena.com/1813149.tar.gz.asc
>> sa-update -v --install 1813149.tar.gz
Last night's run also successfully put the last known good 72_scores.cf
from March into the ruleset.
Steps to manually installing last night's ruleset:
cd /tmp
wget http://sa-update.ena.com/1813258.tar.gz
wget http://sa-update.ena.com/1813258.tar.gz.sha1
wget http://sa-update.ena.com/1813258.tar.gz.asc
sa-update -v --install 1813258.tar.gz
restart spamd, MailScanner, amavisd, mimedefang, etc.
Please provide feedback in the next 48 hours -- positive or negative so
I know we are good to enable DNS updates again on Sunday.
I would like to enable DNS updates on Saturday evening (US time) so the
sa-updates would start again on Sunday.
P.S. Merijn van den Kroonenberg is helping me look at the root of the
problem so we might be able to fix this properly in the next couple of
weeks.
--
David Jones
Re: Ruleset updates via nightly masscheck status
Posted by David Jones <dj...@ena.com>.
On 11/13/2017 02:33 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
>
>
> On 28-10-17 15:20, David Jones wrote:
>> On 10/27/2017 03:02 AM, Merijn van den Kroonenberg wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please provide feedback in the next 48 hours -- positive or negative so
>>>>> I know we are good to enable DNS updates again on Sunday.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> After installing these rules, I'm seeing one warning in my log during
>>>> spamassassin reload:
>>>>
>>>> Oct 27 09:48:24 myhostname spamd[16256]: rules: failed to run
>>>> DKIM_VALID_EF test, skipping:
>>>> Oct 27 09:48:24 myhostname spamd[16256]: (Can't locate object method
>>>> "check_dkim_valid_envelopefrom" via package "Mail:
>>>> [...]:SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at (eval 1369) line 305.
>>>> Oct 27 09:48:24 myhostname spamd[16256]: )
>>>
>>> The DKIM_VALID_EF rule should not be published yet as it depends on a
>>> change in a Plugin.
>>>
>>
>> Tom, thank you for testing and providing feedback. I didn't notice this
>> error because I had patched my DKIM.pm plugin for testing the new
>> DKIM_VALID_EF rule (intended to be used in meta rules). I confirmed
>> what you found on my default Fedora 26 installation.
>>
>> I have fixed the rulesets, specifically 25_dkim.cf and 50_scores.cf, to
>> check for the SA version to remove this error and tested it. Monday's
>> ruleset should have this fix after tomorrow's masscheck validates it.
>>
>> I will confirm Monday's ruleset has fixed this DKIM_VALID_EF error and
>> let sa-update start updating again via DNS on Tuesday.
>>
>> If anyone else is testing the latest rulesets from the past couple of
>> days, please provide feedback in the next 48 hours. And thank you for
>> testing.
>
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that rule updates are still not live in DNS. Can I get an
> updated ruleset for additional testing somewhere, or are we going live?
>
> Regards,
> Tom
>
So... Merijn has been helping me track down bugs. I apologize for the
delay but every little tweak we make takes 1 to 3 days to test. We make
some changes over the weekend that are showing good results. This
morning we got rules promoted for the first time in about 4 weeks
(new/different issue) so the masscheck tonight should generate a new
ruleset.
I will check things in the morning and send out an update. If we have a
good 72_scores.cf then I will install the latest ruleset manually on my
platforms. If everything looks fine, I will ask for volunteers again to
do the same and check their scoring.
--
David Jones
Re: Ruleset updates via nightly masscheck status
Posted by Tom Hendrikx <to...@whyscream.net>.
On 28-10-17 15:20, David Jones wrote:
> On 10/27/2017 03:02 AM, Merijn van den Kroonenberg wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> Please provide feedback in the next 48 hours -- positive or negative so
>>>> I know we are good to enable DNS updates again on Sunday.
>>>>
>>>
>>> After installing these rules, I'm seeing one warning in my log during
>>> spamassassin reload:
>>>
>>> Oct 27 09:48:24 myhostname spamd[16256]: rules: failed to run
>>> DKIM_VALID_EF test, skipping:
>>> Oct 27 09:48:24 myhostname spamd[16256]: (Can't locate object method
>>> "check_dkim_valid_envelopefrom" via package "Mail:
>>> [...]:SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at (eval 1369) line 305.
>>> Oct 27 09:48:24 myhostname spamd[16256]: )
>>
>> The DKIM_VALID_EF rule should not be published yet as it depends on a
>> change in a Plugin.
>>
>
> Tom, thank you for testing and providing feedback. I didn't notice this
> error because I had patched my DKIM.pm plugin for testing the new
> DKIM_VALID_EF rule (intended to be used in meta rules). I confirmed
> what you found on my default Fedora 26 installation.
>
> I have fixed the rulesets, specifically 25_dkim.cf and 50_scores.cf, to
> check for the SA version to remove this error and tested it. Monday's
> ruleset should have this fix after tomorrow's masscheck validates it.
>
> I will confirm Monday's ruleset has fixed this DKIM_VALID_EF error and
> let sa-update start updating again via DNS on Tuesday.
>
> If anyone else is testing the latest rulesets from the past couple of
> days, please provide feedback in the next 48 hours. And thank you for
> testing.
Hi,
I noticed that rule updates are still not live in DNS. Can I get an
updated ruleset for additional testing somewhere, or are we going live?
Regards,
Tom
Re: Ruleset updates via nightly masscheck status
Posted by David Jones <dj...@ena.com>.
On 10/27/2017 03:02 AM, Merijn van den Kroonenberg wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Please provide feedback in the next 48 hours -- positive or negative so
>>> I know we are good to enable DNS updates again on Sunday.
>>>
>>
>> After installing these rules, I'm seeing one warning in my log during
>> spamassassin reload:
>>
>> Oct 27 09:48:24 myhostname spamd[16256]: rules: failed to run
>> DKIM_VALID_EF test, skipping:
>> Oct 27 09:48:24 myhostname spamd[16256]: (Can't locate object method
>> "check_dkim_valid_envelopefrom" via package "Mail:
>> [...]:SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at (eval 1369) line 305.
>> Oct 27 09:48:24 myhostname spamd[16256]: )
>
> The DKIM_VALID_EF rule should not be published yet as it depends on a
> change in a Plugin.
>
Tom, thank you for testing and providing feedback. I didn't notice this
error because I had patched my DKIM.pm plugin for testing the new
DKIM_VALID_EF rule (intended to be used in meta rules). I confirmed
what you found on my default Fedora 26 installation.
I have fixed the rulesets, specifically 25_dkim.cf and 50_scores.cf, to
check for the SA version to remove this error and tested it. Monday's
ruleset should have this fix after tomorrow's masscheck validates it.
I will confirm Monday's ruleset has fixed this DKIM_VALID_EF error and
let sa-update start updating again via DNS on Tuesday.
If anyone else is testing the latest rulesets from the past couple of
days, please provide feedback in the next 48 hours. And thank you for
testing.
>>
>> Any idea? This is ubuntu 16.04, latest ubuntu package (3.4.1-3) for
>> spammassassin.
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Tom
>>
--
David Jones
Re: Ruleset updates via nightly masscheck status
Posted by Merijn van den Kroonenberg <me...@web2all.nl>.
>>
>> Please provide feedback in the next 48 hours -- positive or negative so
>> I know we are good to enable DNS updates again on Sunday.
>>
>
> After installing these rules, I'm seeing one warning in my log during
> spamassassin reload:
>
> Oct 27 09:48:24 myhostname spamd[16256]: rules: failed to run
> DKIM_VALID_EF test, skipping:
> Oct 27 09:48:24 myhostname spamd[16256]: (Can't locate object method
> "check_dkim_valid_envelopefrom" via package "Mail:
> [...]:SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at (eval 1369) line 305.
> Oct 27 09:48:24 myhostname spamd[16256]: )
The DKIM_VALID_EF rule should not be published yet as it depends on a
change in a Plugin.
>
> Any idea? This is ubuntu 16.04, latest ubuntu package (3.4.1-3) for
> spammassassin.
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Tom
>
Re: Ruleset updates via nightly masscheck status
Posted by Tom Hendrikx <to...@whyscream.net>.
On 26-10-17 20:33, David Jones wrote:
> On 10/26/2017 01:09 PM, David Jones wrote:
>> On 10/25/2017 06:15 AM, David Jones wrote:
>>> cd /tmp
>>> wget http://sa-update.ena.com/1813149.tar.gz
>>> wget http://sa-update.ena.com/1813149.tar.gz.sha1
>>> wget http://sa-update.ena.com/1813149.tar.gz.asc
>>> sa-update -v --install 1813149.tar.gz
>
> Last night's run also successfully put the last known good 72_scores.cf
> from March into the ruleset.
>
> Steps to manually installing last night's ruleset:
>
> cd /tmp
> wget http://sa-update.ena.com/1813258.tar.gz
> wget http://sa-update.ena.com/1813258.tar.gz.sha1
> wget http://sa-update.ena.com/1813258.tar.gz.asc
> sa-update -v --install 1813258.tar.gz
>
> restart spamd, MailScanner, amavisd, mimedefang, etc.
>
> Please provide feedback in the next 48 hours -- positive or negative so
> I know we are good to enable DNS updates again on Sunday.
>
After installing these rules, I'm seeing one warning in my log during
spamassassin reload:
Oct 27 09:48:24 myhostname spamd[16256]: rules: failed to run
DKIM_VALID_EF test, skipping:
Oct 27 09:48:24 myhostname spamd[16256]: (Can't locate object method
"check_dkim_valid_envelopefrom" via package "Mail:
[...]:SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at (eval 1369) line 305.
Oct 27 09:48:24 myhostname spamd[16256]: )
Any idea? This is ubuntu 16.04, latest ubuntu package (3.4.1-3) for
spammassassin.
Kind regards,
Tom