You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@brooklyn.apache.org by Svetoslav Neykov <sv...@cloudsoftcorp.com> on 2015/04/03 14:00:45 UTC
Logging for #brooklyncentral
I suggest that we start logging the conversations in #brooklyncentral. Currently it's not clear if I missed anything while offline, whether a question was answered already. I came across https://botbot.me/ <https://botbot.me/> while searching for jclouds related issues (https://botbot.me/freenode/jclouds/ <https://botbot.me/freenode/jclouds/>) - looks like a widely used bot for open source projects. It's also open source and can be used on our own infrastructure if desired.
A channel request should preferably be done by a channel OP, that's why I haven't done it myself already, any volunteers?
It'd be great if the logs could be used directly by IRC clients, kind of like an IRC bouncer, but haven't seen such a feature.
Svet.
Re: Logging for #brooklyncentral
Posted by Marcel Offermans <ma...@luminis.nl>.
Thanks for clarifying the situation. One of the important mantras at Apache is “if it’s not on the mailing list, it did not happen” which is what triggered my e-mail.
On 3 Apr 2015 at 15:36:02, Svetoslav Neykov (svetoslav.neykov@cloudsoftcorp.com) wrote:
Thanks for bringing it up Marcel. It definitely makes sense. What I had in mind though was whether I missed any questions from newcomers that I could help address. It is also the case that sometimes the person asking the question is already offline when you are there to answer him. In these (Q&A) cases logging would be very useful. For deeper discussions concerning Brooklyn the mailing list would be a better fit.
Svet.
> On 3.04.2015 г., at 16:26, Marcel Offermans <ma...@luminis.nl> wrote:
>
> Just a friendly reminder that, even though it is fine to use IRC, real life and other ways of getting together and discussing things, such discussions should always be summarised on the mailing list.
>
> Therefore, if you feel you are “missing things” (and that feeling is confirmed by reading back the IRC logs) then this is a sign that such conversations are not properly brought back to the mailing list.
>
> Greetings, Marcel (with my mentor hat on)
>
> On 3 Apr 2015 at 14:06:01, Svetoslav Neykov (svetoslav.neykov@cloudsoftcorp.com <ma...@cloudsoftcorp.com>) wrote:
>
>> I suggest that we start logging the conversations in #brooklyncentral. Currently it's not clear if I missed anything while offline, whether a question was answered already. I came across https://botbot.me/ <https://botbot.me/> <https://botbot.me/ <https://botbot.me/>> while searching for jclouds related issues (https://botbot.me/freenode/jclouds/ <https://botbot.me/freenode/jclouds/> <https://botbot.me/freenode/jclouds/ <https://botbot.me/freenode/jclouds/>>) - looks like a widely used bot for open source projects. It's also open source and can be used on our own infrastructure if desired.
>> A channel request should preferably be done by a channel OP, that's why I haven't done it myself already, any volunteers?
>>
>> It'd be great if the logs could be used directly by IRC clients, kind of like an IRC bouncer, but haven't seen such a feature.
>>
>> Svet.
Re: Logging for #brooklyncentral
Posted by Svetoslav Neykov <sv...@cloudsoftcorp.com>.
Thanks for bringing it up Marcel. It definitely makes sense. What I had in mind though was whether I missed any questions from newcomers that I could help address. It is also the case that sometimes the person asking the question is already offline when you are there to answer him. In these (Q&A) cases logging would be very useful. For deeper discussions concerning Brooklyn the mailing list would be a better fit.
Svet.
> On 3.04.2015 г., at 16:26, Marcel Offermans <ma...@luminis.nl> wrote:
>
> Just a friendly reminder that, even though it is fine to use IRC, real life and other ways of getting together and discussing things, such discussions should always be summarised on the mailing list.
>
> Therefore, if you feel you are “missing things” (and that feeling is confirmed by reading back the IRC logs) then this is a sign that such conversations are not properly brought back to the mailing list.
>
> Greetings, Marcel (with my mentor hat on)
>
> On 3 Apr 2015 at 14:06:01, Svetoslav Neykov (svetoslav.neykov@cloudsoftcorp.com <ma...@cloudsoftcorp.com>) wrote:
>
>> I suggest that we start logging the conversations in #brooklyncentral. Currently it's not clear if I missed anything while offline, whether a question was answered already. I came across https://botbot.me/ <https://botbot.me/> <https://botbot.me/ <https://botbot.me/>> while searching for jclouds related issues (https://botbot.me/freenode/jclouds/ <https://botbot.me/freenode/jclouds/> <https://botbot.me/freenode/jclouds/ <https://botbot.me/freenode/jclouds/>>) - looks like a widely used bot for open source projects. It's also open source and can be used on our own infrastructure if desired.
>> A channel request should preferably be done by a channel OP, that's why I haven't done it myself already, any volunteers?
>>
>> It'd be great if the logs could be used directly by IRC clients, kind of like an IRC bouncer, but haven't seen such a feature.
>>
>> Svet.
Re: Logging for #brooklyncentral
Posted by Marcel Offermans <ma...@luminis.nl>.
Just a friendly reminder that, even though it is fine to use IRC, real life and other ways of getting together and discussing things, such discussions should always be summarised on the mailing list.
Therefore, if you feel you are “missing things” (and that feeling is confirmed by reading back the IRC logs) then this is a sign that such conversations are not properly brought back to the mailing list.
Greetings, Marcel (with my mentor hat on)
On 3 Apr 2015 at 14:06:01, Svetoslav Neykov (svetoslav.neykov@cloudsoftcorp.com) wrote:
I suggest that we start logging the conversations in #brooklyncentral. Currently it's not clear if I missed anything while offline, whether a question was answered already. I came across https://botbot.me/ <https://botbot.me/> while searching for jclouds related issues (https://botbot.me/freenode/jclouds/ <https://botbot.me/freenode/jclouds/>) - looks like a widely used bot for open source projects. It's also open source and can be used on our own infrastructure if desired.
A channel request should preferably be done by a channel OP, that's why I haven't done it myself already, any volunteers?
It'd be great if the logs could be used directly by IRC clients, kind of like an IRC bouncer, but haven't seen such a feature.
Svet.