You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@groovy.apache.org by "Christoffer Hammarström (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/02/22 02:21:44 UTC

[jira] [Created] (GROOVY-8096) setScriptBaseClass with Java base class breaks @Field initialization from Binding due to wrong constructor

Christoffer Hammarström created GROOVY-8096:
-----------------------------------------------

             Summary: setScriptBaseClass with Java base class breaks @Field initialization from Binding due to wrong constructor
                 Key: GROOVY-8096
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8096
             Project: Groovy
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Compiler, GroovyScriptEngine
    Affects Versions: 2.4.8
            Reporter: Christoffer Hammarström


I created a pull request on GitHub with a failing test showing the problem: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/502

This test fails because {{ModuleNode.setScriptBaseClassFromConfig(ClassNode)}}
calls {{.setSuperClass(ClassHelper.make(baseClassName))}} on the {{scriptDummy ClassNode}}.

The {{ClassNode}} created for this script's base class has {{.lazyInitDone = true}} and {{.constructors = null}}

{{ModuleNode.createStatementsClass()}} calls {{.getSuperClass().getDeclaredConstructor(SCRIPT_CONTEXT_CTOR)}} 

Then {{ClassNode.constructors}} is set to an empty ArrayList in {{ClassNode.getDeclaredConstructors()}}, insteaf of looking them up from the Java class.

The script constructor is then generated in {{ModuleNode.createStatementsClass()}} as:

{code:java}
     Constructor(Binding context) {
         super();             // Fields are initialized after the call to super()
                              // Fields are initialized here without binding
         setBinding(context); // Fields are initialized before setBinding
     }
{code}

instead of

{code:java}
     Constructor(Binding context) {
         super(context); // Fields are initialized after the call to super(context)
     }
{code}

We're calling the default constructor in the base class with {{super()}}, instead of passing along the {{Binding context}} with {{super(context)}} 

This breaks initialization of Fields that depend on the {{Binding context}}.

Fields are initialized between the call to {{super()}} and the {{setBinding(context)}}: http://stackoverflow.com/a/14806340/233014

This leads to {{MissingPropertyException}} because we're trying to look up variables from the {{new Binding()}} created in the default constructor, instead of the binding we passed in.




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)