Re: Re: svn commit: r438412 - in /hivemind/branches/branch-2-0-annot: framework/src/java/org/apache/hivemind/ framework/src/java/org/apache/hivemind/definition/ framework/src/java/org/apache/hivemind/impl/ framework/src/java/org/apache/hivemind/impl/

[Knut Wannheden <kn...@gmail.com>]

OK, I just thought that these Natures you had also were in the
ServicePointDefinition objects.

Cheers,

--knut

On 8/30/06, Achim Hügen <ac...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Previously all information from the definition object was just copied
> to the service point. Since I needed even more data from the definition
> in the service point (to simplify the constructor interfaces)
> I decided to remove the redundancy. I don't expect a memory overhead.
>
> Achim
>
> Knut Wannheden schrieb:
> > Achim,
> >
> > On 8/30/06, ahuegen@apache.org <ah...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> Author: ahuegen
> >> Date: Wed Aug 30 00:48:57 2006
> >> New Revision: 438412
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=438412&view=rev
> >> Log:
> >> ServicePointImpl keeps a reference to ServicePointDefinition
> >>
> >
> > I have unfortunately not been able to follow the latest developments
> > in your experimental branch that closely but this one caught my
> > attention. If I understand this correctly then the internal runtime
> > ServicePointImpl object will keep a reference to the
> > ServicePointDefinition object describing it. Will this reference be
> > unset once the runtime service object has been properly initialized?
> > Or will this reference remain in which case the definition object and
> > everything it references could never be garbage collected?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --knut
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>