You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bookkeeper.apache.org by "Flavio Junqueira (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/06/25 15:37:43 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-315) Ledger entries should be
replicated sequentially instead of parallel.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13400470#comment-13400470 ]
Flavio Junqueira commented on BOOKKEEPER-315:
---------------------------------------------
Hi Uma, Sequentially as in a chain? Or sequentially meaning one at a time?
> Ledger entries should be replicated sequentially instead of parallel.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-315
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-315
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: bookkeeper-client
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0
> Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G
> Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G
>
> Currently BookKeeperAdmin will copy the entries parallel.
> This may create more load on the servers. To avoid that, we can refactor the BKAdmin code to copy the entries sequential.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira