You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wink.apache.org by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> on 2013/07/24 04:19:26 UTC
JAX-RS 2.0 branch ...
I'm about to cut a branch for people to start working on pieces from JAX-RS
2.0 spec.
I'll name it something like wink/2.x/trunk (and later on move the 1.x to
wink/1.x/trunk)
As for the new branch, I'd like to at minimum drop JDK 5.0 support, and
maybe even JDK 6.0 which is already AOLed by Oracle.
Thoughts ?
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: JAX-RS 2.0 branch ...
Posted by Mike Rheinheimer <ro...@ohmyhead.com>.
+1
mike
On Jul 24, 2013 1:49 AM, "Gerhard Petracek" <ge...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2013/7/24 Bryant Luk <br...@gmail.com>
>
> > That sounds like a reasonable plan to me.
> >
> > @bluk
> >
> > On Jul 23, 2013, at 7:19 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm about to cut a branch for people to start working on pieces from
> > JAX-RS
> > > 2.0 spec.
> > >
> > > I'll name it something like wink/2.x/trunk (and later on move the 1.x
> to
> > > wink/1.x/trunk)
> > >
> > > As for the new branch, I'd like to at minimum drop JDK 5.0 support, and
> > > maybe even JDK 6.0 which is already AOLed by Oracle.
> > >
> > > Thoughts ?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Luciano Resende
> > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
>
Re: JAX-RS 2.0 branch ...
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>.
+1
regards,
gerhard
2013/7/24 Bryant Luk <br...@gmail.com>
> That sounds like a reasonable plan to me.
>
> @bluk
>
> On Jul 23, 2013, at 7:19 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm about to cut a branch for people to start working on pieces from
> JAX-RS
> > 2.0 spec.
> >
> > I'll name it something like wink/2.x/trunk (and later on move the 1.x to
> > wink/1.x/trunk)
> >
> > As for the new branch, I'd like to at minimum drop JDK 5.0 support, and
> > maybe even JDK 6.0 which is already AOLed by Oracle.
> >
> > Thoughts ?
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
Re: JAX-RS 2.0 branch ...
Posted by Bryant Luk <br...@gmail.com>.
That sounds like a reasonable plan to me.
@bluk
On Jul 23, 2013, at 7:19 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm about to cut a branch for people to start working on pieces from JAX-RS
> 2.0 spec.
>
> I'll name it something like wink/2.x/trunk (and later on move the 1.x to
> wink/1.x/trunk)
>
> As for the new branch, I'd like to at minimum drop JDK 5.0 support, and
> maybe even JDK 6.0 which is already AOLed by Oracle.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: JAX-RS 2.0 branch ...
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>.
thx luciano and also for creating the version in jira.
it would be great to get a git mirror as well.
regards,
gerhard
2013/8/8 Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > I'm about to cut a branch for people to start working on pieces from
> > JAX-RS 2.0 spec.
> >
> > I'll name it something like wink/2.x/trunk (and later on move the 1.x to
> > wink/1.x/trunk)
> >
> > As for the new branch, I'd like to at minimum drop JDK 5.0 support, and
> > maybe even JDK 6.0 which is already AOLed by Oracle.
> >
> > Thoughts ?
> >
> >
>
> New codebase structure is ready:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wink/2.x/
>
> Now, let's have some fun with it.
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
Re: JAX-RS 2.0 branch ...
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I'm about to cut a branch for people to start working on pieces from
> JAX-RS 2.0 spec.
>
> I'll name it something like wink/2.x/trunk (and later on move the 1.x to
> wink/1.x/trunk)
>
> As for the new branch, I'd like to at minimum drop JDK 5.0 support, and
> maybe even JDK 6.0 which is already AOLed by Oracle.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
>
New codebase structure is ready:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wink/2.x/
Now, let's have some fun with it.
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/