You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@arrow.apache.org by Raúl Cumplido <ra...@gmail.com> on 2023/01/25 10:17:35 UTC

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 11.0.0 - RC0

Hi,

The result of the vote is successful with 3 +1 binding votes, 3 +1
non-binding votes and no -1 votes.

I will start with the post release tasks [1] and Kou has volunteered to
help me with the tasks that require PMC.

Can someone with PARQUET permissions help with the following tasks:
- Make the CPP PARQUET related version as "RELEASED" on JIRA
- Start the new version on JIRA for the related CPP PARQUET version

Thanks,
Raúl

[1]
https://arrow.apache.org/docs/dev/developers/release.html#post-release-tasks

El dom, 22 ene 2023 a las 18:36, Dewey Dunnington
(<de...@voltrondata.com.invalid>) escribió:

> Just a note that I wasn't able to produce an error building Arrow C++ using
> clang-dev [1]. That isn't to say one doesn't still exist (I will test more
> thoroughly in the coming days), but it does suggest that it's something we
> can/should handle at the packaging stage if it does pop up (rather than
> block a release).
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33819
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 8:44 PM Sutou Kouhei <ko...@clear-code.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > * Fix now, include in an 11.0.0 RC1, start a new vote.
> > > * Proceed with RC0, fix for 12.0.0 (and 11.0.1, should it happen), and
> > > cherry-pick the fix into the bundle we upload to CRAN for 11.0.0. (This
> > is
> > > something we do regularly, not a crazy exception.)
> >
> > We don't find any blocker for 11.0.0 for now. How about
> > releasing 11.0.0 with RC0 and releasing 11.0.1 with clang 16
> > support? (The latter option.)
> >
> >
> > We may want to add a CI job with llvm-toolchain-snapshot
> > https://apt.llvm.org/focal/pool/main/l/llvm-toolchain-snapshot/
> > . We will be able to avoid this situation (Apache Arrow C++
> > doesn't work with unreleased LLVM) with it in future.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > kou
> >
> > In <CA...@mail.gmail.com>
> >   "Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 11.0.0 - RC0" on Fri, 20 Jan 2023
> > 10:50:29 -0500,
> >   Neal Richardson <ne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I received an email this morning from the CRAN maintainers about a C++
> > > build failure on clang 16. Although clang 16 is not scheduled for
> release
> > > until March, CRAN wants to ensure that all packages build successfully
> on
> > > it when it becomes available, so they've given us an ultimatum to fix
> the
> > > issue or face removal.
> > >
> > > Whether or not we agree with this policy (not relevant for us to
> discuss
> > > here), we have two options:
> > >
> > > * Fix now, include in an 11.0.0 RC1, start a new vote.
> > > * Proceed with RC0, fix for 12.0.0 (and 11.0.1, should it happen), and
> > > cherry-pick the fix into the bundle we upload to CRAN for 11.0.0. (This
> > is
> > > something we do regularly, not a crazy exception.)
> > >
> > > https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/clang16/README.txt suggests that
> the
> > fix
> > > could be as easy as upgrading our bundled boost version, but we won't
> > know
> > > for sure until we reproduce it. We suppress libarrow build output on
> > CRAN,
> > > so unfortunately there are no logs from their report.
> > >
> > > I'm fine with either option. clang 16 will be out before we do the
> 12.0.0
> > > release, and it would be nice if we compiled successfully on it, but I
> > > don't have strong feelings as to whether that is "nice to have" enough
> to
> > > force an RC1.
> > >
> > > Neal
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 8:39 AM Raúl Cumplido <ra...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 (non binding)
> > >>
> > >> I have tested both SOURCES and BINARIES successfully with:
> > >> TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
> > 11.0.0
> > >> 0
> > >> TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_WHEELS=1 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
> > 11.0.0
> > >> 0
> > >> TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_BINARIES=1 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
> > >> 11.0.0 0
> > >> with:
> > >>   * Python 3.10.6
> > >>   * gcc (Ubuntu 11.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 11.3.0
> > >>   * NVIDIA CUDA cuda_11.5.r11.5/compiler.30672275_0
> > >>   * openjdk 17.0.5 2022-10-18
> > >>   * ruby 3.0.2p107 (2021-07-07 revision 0db68f0233) [x86_64-linux-gnu]
> > >>   * dotnet 6.0.202
> > >>   * Ubuntu 22.04 LTS
> > >>
> > >> From my understanding the identified issues are not release blockers,
> > >> that's why I am voting +1:
> > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33783
> > >> We are compatible with dotnet 7.0.x but we are only compatible testing
> > with
> > >> 6.0.x. More info on the issue and PR associated.
> > >> [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33786
> > >> XSIMD on Ubuntu, I have tested the proposed workaround and built and
> run
> > >> verification successfully.
> > >> [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/15054
> > >> aws-sdk-cpp leak and flaky test crash. More discussions on the issue
> but
> > >> doesn't seem to be a blocker.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Raúl
> > >>
> > >> El vie, 20 ene 2023 a las 6:06, Weston Pace (<we...@gmail.com>)
> > >> escribió:
> > >>
> > >> > I've got a fix[1] in for the verification script for C#.  There are
> > >> > more details in the issue and the PR but IMO we are compatible with
> > >> > C#7 and C#6, we simply were not testing it correctly.  I have run
> the
> > >> > tests locally with both 6.0 and 7.0 sdks and they passed.
> > >> >
> > >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33799
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 5:52 PM Jacob Wujciak
> > >> > <ja...@voltrondata.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I have investigated the issue of the system xsimd causing an error
> > [1]
> > >> > and
> > >> > > I don't think this should be a blocker as it can be circumvented
> by
> > >> > > explicitly setting xsimd_SOURCE=BUNDLED.
> > >> > > I don't think the incompatibility with C# 7 should be a blocker
> > either,
> > >> > it
> > >> > > should probably be documented that we are not compatible with that
> > >> > version
> > >> > > somewhere (if that is not already the case) but otherwise it is
> > fine,
> > >> > e.g.
> > >> > > JS is incompatible with nodejs 18.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33786
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 6:08 PM Rok Mihevc <ro...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > On a relatively fresh Ubuntu 22.04 without conda I had to apt
> > install
> > >> > some
> > >> > > > libs (default-jdk
> > >> > > > maven libjemalloc-dev libgirepository1.0-dev libsqlite3-dev) and
> > this
> > >> > > > passed fine:
> > >> > > > TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1
> > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > +1
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Rok
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 3:05 PM Raúl Cumplido <
> > >> raulcumplido@gmail.com>
> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > Thanks Antoine, I can finally reproduce it.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Thanks Jacob Wujciak for the pointer on the log, I couldn't
> find
> > >> it:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > -- Building xsimd from source
> > >> > > > > CMake Error at cmake_modules/ThirdpartyToolchain.cmake:2295
> > >> > > > (add_library):
> > >> > > > >   add_library cannot create imported target "xsimd" because
> > another
> > >> > > > target
> > >> > > > >   with the same name already exists.
> > >> > > > > Call Stack (most recent call first):
> > >> > > > >   CMakeLists.txt:498 (include)
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > I can reproduce it if I install `apt install libxsimd-dev`.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > I've opened an issue to track it here:
> > >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33786
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Thanks!
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > El jue, 19 ene 2023 a las 13:27, Antoine Pitrou (<
> > >> antoine@python.org
> > >> > >)
> > >> > > > > escribió:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > I used the following command:
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > LANG=C TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_CPP=1
> > >> > > > > > ./dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 11.0.0 0
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Here is the full output:
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > https://gist.github.com/pitrou/3fdca2460fa71bba731b0706703b70b2
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Regards
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Antoine.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Le 19/01/2023 à 13:07, Raúl Cumplido a écrit :
> > >> > > > > > > El jue, 19 ene 2023 a las 12:21, Antoine Pitrou (<
> > >> > antoine@python.org
> > >> > > > >)
> > >> > > > > > > escribió:
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >> On Ubuntu 22.04, C++ source verification *without conda*
> > fails
> > >> > > > because
> > >> > > > > > >> it is attempting to find various libraries (re2, LLVM,
> > >> > rapidjson,
> > >> > > > > etc.).
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >> Antoine, could you help me understand what the issue is
> > here
> > >> or
> > >> > how
> > >> > > > to
> > >> > > > > > > reproduce it? I can't reproduce it.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > I don't use conda, I use Ubuntu 22.04 and apart from being
> > able
> > >> > to
> > >> > > > > > > reproduce the C# issue if I use .NET 7.0.102 the rest
> looks
> > >> good
> > >> > on
> > >> > > > my
> > >> > > > > > side
> > >> > > > > > > (when using old C#):
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > $ TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1
> > >> > > > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
> > >> > > > > > > 11.0.0 0
> > >> > > > > > > ...
> > >> > > > > > > Release candidate 11.0.0-RC0 looks good!
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >> C++ source verification succeeds with conda.
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >> Le 19/01/2023 à 11:06, Raúl Cumplido a écrit :
> > >> > > > > > >>> Hi,
> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > >>> I would like to propose the following release candidate
> > (RC0)
> > >> > of
> > >> > > > > Apache
> > >> > > > > > >>> Arrow version 11.0.0. This is a release consisting of
> 423
> > >> > > > > > >>> resolved GitHub issues[1].
> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > >>> This release candidate is based on commit:
> > >> > > > > > >>> f10f5cfd1376fb0e602334588b3f3624d41dee7d [2]
> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > >>> The source release rc0 is hosted at [3].
> > >> > > > > > >>> The binary artifacts are hosted at
> > >> [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].
> > >> > > > > > >>> The changelog is located at [12].
> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > >>> Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run
> the
> > >> unit
> > >> > > > tests,
> > >> > > > > > >>> and vote on the release. See [13] for how to validate a
> > >> release
> > >> > > > > > >> candidate.
> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > >>> See also a verification result on GitHub pull request
> > [14].
> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > >>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow 11.0.0
> > >> > > > > > >>> [ ] +0
> > >> > > > > > >>> [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow 11.0.0
> > because...
> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > >>> [1]:
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/milestone/1?closed=1
> > >> > > > > > >>> [2]:
> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/f10f5cfd1376fb0e602334588b3f3624d41dee7d
> > >> > > > > > >>> [3]:
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-11.0.0-rc0
> > >> > > > > > >>> [4]:
> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/almalinux-rc/
> > >> > > > > > >>> [5]:
> > >> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/amazon-linux-rc/
> > >> > > > > > >>> [6]:
> https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/centos-rc/
> > >> > > > > > >>> [7]:
> https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/debian-rc/
> > >> > > > > > >>> [8]:
> > >> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/java-rc/11.0.0-rc0
> > >> > > > > > >>> [9]:
> > >> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/nuget-rc/11.0.0-rc0
> > >> > > > > > >>> [10]:
> > >> > > > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/python-rc/11.0.0-rc0
> > >> > > > > > >>> [11]:
> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/ubuntu-rc/
> > >> > > > > > >>> [12]:
> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/f10f5cfd1376fb0e602334588b3f3624d41dee7d/CHANGELOG.md
> > >> > > > > > >>> [13]:
> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/How+to+Verify+Release+Candidates
> > >> > > > > > >>> [14]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33751
> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
>

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 11.0.0 - RC0

Posted by Raúl Cumplido <ra...@apache.org>.

Hi,

The current status of the post-release tasks. I will follow up on them.
Thanks everyone!

- [done] Update the released milestone Date and set to "Closed" on GitHub
- [done] Merge changes on release branch to maintenance branch for patch
releases
- [done] Add the new release to the Apache Reporter System
- [done] Upload source
- [done] Upload binaries
- [done] Update website
- [done] Upload JavaScript packages
- [done] Upload C# packages
- [done] Upload wheels/sdist to pypi
- [done] Publish Maven artifacts
- [done] Update MSYS2 package
- [done] Bump versions
- [done] Update tags for Go modules
- [done] Update docs
- [done] Publish release blog posts
- [done] Announce the new release
- [in-progress] Update Homebrew packages
- [in-progress] Update vcpkg port
- [] Upload RubyGems --> waiting for homebrew
- [] Update Conan recipe
- [] Update version in Apache Arrow Cookbook --> was waiting conda
- [] Remove old artifacts

I will need help with the following (and might need help with some of the
above, I'll ask if needed):
- [] Make the CPP PARQUET related version as "RELEASED" on JIRA
- [] Start the new version on JIRA for the related CPP PARQUET version
- [done] Update conda recipes
- [] Update R packages

El vie, 27 ene 2023 a las 16:36, Neal Richardson (<
neal.p.richardson@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Conda often happens automatically; looks like there is already a PR:
> https://github.com/conda-forge/arrow-cpp-feedstock/pull/941
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 9:52 AM Raúl Cumplido <ra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The current status of the post-release tasks. I will keep working on the
> > rest of tasks during the next days:
> >
> > - [done] Update the released milestone Date and set to "Closed" on GitHub
> > - [done] Merge changes on release branch to maintenance branch for patch
> > releases
> > - [done] Add the new release to the Apache Reporter System
> > - [done] Upload source
> > - [done] Upload binaries
> > - [done] Update website
> > - [done] Upload JavaScript packages
> > - [done] Upload C# packages
> > - [done] Upload wheels/sdist to pypi
> > - [done] Publish Maven artifacts
> > - [in-progress] Update Homebrew packages
> > - [in-progress] Update MSYS2 package
> > - [] Upload RubyGems
> > - [] Update vcpkg port
> > - [] Update Conan recipe
> > - [] Bump versions
> > - [] Update tags for Go modules
> > - [] Update docs
> > - [] Update version in Apache Arrow Cookbook
> > - [] Announce the new release
> > - [] Publish release blog posts
> > - [] Remove old artifacts
> >
> > I will need help with the following (and might need help with some of the
> > above, I'll ask if needed):
> > - [] Make the CPP PARQUET related version as "RELEASED" on JIRA
> > - [] Start the new version on JIRA for the related CPP PARQUET version
> > - [] Update conda recipes
> > - [] Update R packages
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Raúl
> >
> > El mié, 25 ene 2023 a las 21:07, Sutou Kouhei (<ko...@clear-code.com>)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I did the followings because they require PMC:
> > >
> > > - Add the new release to the Apache Reporter System
> > > - Upload source
> > >
> > > The current status:
> > >
> > > - [done] Update the released milestone Date and set to "Closed" on
> GitHub
> > > - [] Make the CPP PARQUET related version as "RELEASED" on JIRA
> > > - [] Start the new version on JIRA for the related CPP PARQUET version
> > > - [done] Merge changes on release branch to maintenance branch for
> patch
> > > releases
> > > - [done] Add the new release to the Apache Reporter System
> > > - [done] Upload source
> > > - [] Upload binaries
> > > - [] Update website
> > > - [] Update Homebrew packages
> > > - [] Update MSYS2 package
> > > - [] Upload RubyGems
> > > - [] Upload JavaScript packages
> > > - [] Upload C# packages
> > > - [] Update conda recipes
> > > - [] Upload wheels/sdist to pypi
> > > - [] Publish Maven artifacts
> > > - [] Update R packages
> > > - [] Update vcpkg port
> > > - [] Update Conan recipe
> > > - [] Bump versions
> > > - [] Update tags for Go modules
> > > - [] Update docs
> > > - [] Update version in Apache Arrow Cookbook
> > > - [] Announce the new release
> > > - [] Publish release blog posts
> > > - [] Remove old artifacts
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > --
> > > kou
> > >
> > > In <CAD1RbrrHUZ5R_GVcixCQCp_W652LavJVnvx+LmWFkuCy8+X6Og@mail.gmail.com
> >
> > >   "[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 11.0.0 - RC0" on Wed, 25 Jan
> 2023
> > > 11:17:35 +0100,
> > >   Raúl Cumplido <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > The result of the vote is successful with 3 +1 binding votes, 3 +1
> > > > non-binding votes and no -1 votes.
> > > >
> > > > I will start with the post release tasks [1] and Kou has volunteered
> to
> > > > help me with the tasks that require PMC.
> > > >
> > > > Can someone with PARQUET permissions help with the following tasks:
> > > > - Make the CPP PARQUET related version as "RELEASED" on JIRA
> > > > - Start the new version on JIRA for the related CPP PARQUET version
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Raúl
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://arrow.apache.org/docs/dev/developers/release.html#post-release-tasks
> > > >
> > > > El dom, 22 ene 2023 a las 18:36, Dewey Dunnington
> > > > (<de...@voltrondata.com.invalid>) escribió:
> > > >
> > > >> Just a note that I wasn't able to produce an error building Arrow
> C++
> > > using
> > > >> clang-dev [1]. That isn't to say one doesn't still exist (I will
> test
> > > more
> > > >> thoroughly in the coming days), but it does suggest that it's
> > something
> > > we
> > > >> can/should handle at the packaging stage if it does pop up (rather
> > than
> > > >> block a release).
> > > >>
> > > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33819
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 8:44 PM Sutou Kouhei <ko...@clear-code.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > * Fix now, include in an 11.0.0 RC1, start a new vote.
> > > >> > > * Proceed with RC0, fix for 12.0.0 (and 11.0.1, should it
> happen),
> > > and
> > > >> > > cherry-pick the fix into the bundle we upload to CRAN for
> 11.0.0.
> > > (This
> > > >> > is
> > > >> > > something we do regularly, not a crazy exception.)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > We don't find any blocker for 11.0.0 for now. How about
> > > >> > releasing 11.0.0 with RC0 and releasing 11.0.1 with clang 16
> > > >> > support? (The latter option.)
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > We may want to add a CI job with llvm-toolchain-snapshot
> > > >> > https://apt.llvm.org/focal/pool/main/l/llvm-toolchain-snapshot/
> > > >> > . We will be able to avoid this situation (Apache Arrow C++
> > > >> > doesn't work with unreleased LLVM) with it in future.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks,
> > > >> > --
> > > >> > kou
> > > >> >
> > > >> > In <
> > > CAOCv4hjj_Jzv4fwupdm9DbYjiFVGSv0S96p+VwgSF17efMmD-Q@mail.gmail.com>
> > > >> >   "Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 11.0.0 - RC0" on Fri, 20 Jan
> 2023
> > > >> > 10:50:29 -0500,
> > > >> >   Neal Richardson <ne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > I received an email this morning from the CRAN maintainers
> about a
> > > C++
> > > >> > > build failure on clang 16. Although clang 16 is not scheduled
> for
> > > >> release
> > > >> > > until March, CRAN wants to ensure that all packages build
> > > successfully
> > > >> on
> > > >> > > it when it becomes available, so they've given us an ultimatum
> to
> > > fix
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > issue or face removal.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Whether or not we agree with this policy (not relevant for us to
> > > >> discuss
> > > >> > > here), we have two options:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > * Fix now, include in an 11.0.0 RC1, start a new vote.
> > > >> > > * Proceed with RC0, fix for 12.0.0 (and 11.0.1, should it
> happen),
> > > and
> > > >> > > cherry-pick the fix into the bundle we upload to CRAN for
> 11.0.0.
> > > (This
> > > >> > is
> > > >> > > something we do regularly, not a crazy exception.)
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/clang16/README.txt suggests
> > that
> > > >> the
> > > >> > fix
> > > >> > > could be as easy as upgrading our bundled boost version, but we
> > > won't
> > > >> > know
> > > >> > > for sure until we reproduce it. We suppress libarrow build
> output
> > on
> > > >> > CRAN,
> > > >> > > so unfortunately there are no logs from their report.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > I'm fine with either option. clang 16 will be out before we do
> the
> > > >> 12.0.0
> > > >> > > release, and it would be nice if we compiled successfully on it,
> > > but I
> > > >> > > don't have strong feelings as to whether that is "nice to have"
> > > enough
> > > >> to
> > > >> > > force an RC1.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Neal
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 8:39 AM Raúl Cumplido <
> > > raulcumplido@gmail.com>
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> +1 (non binding)
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> I have tested both SOURCES and BINARIES successfully with:
> > > >> > >> TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1
> > > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
> > > >> > 11.0.0
> > > >> > >> 0
> > > >> > >> TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_WHEELS=1
> > > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
> > > >> > 11.0.0
> > > >> > >> 0
> > > >> > >> TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_BINARIES=1
> > > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
> > > >> > >> 11.0.0 0
> > > >> > >> with:
> > > >> > >>   * Python 3.10.6
> > > >> > >>   * gcc (Ubuntu 11.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 11.3.0
> > > >> > >>   * NVIDIA CUDA cuda_11.5.r11.5/compiler.30672275_0
> > > >> > >>   * openjdk 17.0.5 2022-10-18
> > > >> > >>   * ruby 3.0.2p107 (2021-07-07 revision 0db68f0233)
> > > [x86_64-linux-gnu]
> > > >> > >>   * dotnet 6.0.202
> > > >> > >>   * Ubuntu 22.04 LTS
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> From my understanding the identified issues are not release
> > > blockers,
> > > >> > >> that's why I am voting +1:
> > > >> > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33783
> > > >> > >> We are compatible with dotnet 7.0.x but we are only compatible
> > > testing
> > > >> > with
> > > >> > >> 6.0.x. More info on the issue and PR associated.
> > > >> > >> [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33786
> > > >> > >> XSIMD on Ubuntu, I have tested the proposed workaround and
> built
> > > and
> > > >> run
> > > >> > >> verification successfully.
> > > >> > >> [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/15054
> > > >> > >> aws-sdk-cpp leak and flaky test crash. More discussions on the
> > > issue
> > > >> but
> > > >> > >> doesn't seem to be a blocker.
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> Thanks,
> > > >> > >> Raúl
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> El vie, 20 ene 2023 a las 6:06, Weston Pace (<
> > > weston.pace@gmail.com>)
> > > >> > >> escribió:
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> > I've got a fix[1] in for the verification script for C#.
> There
> > > are
> > > >> > >> > more details in the issue and the PR but IMO we are
> compatible
> > > with
> > > >> > >> > C#7 and C#6, we simply were not testing it correctly.  I have
> > run
> > > >> the
> > > >> > >> > tests locally with both 6.0 and 7.0 sdks and they passed.
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33799
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 5:52 PM Jacob Wujciak
> > > >> > >> > <ja...@voltrondata.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > I have investigated the issue of the system xsimd causing
> an
> > > error
> > > >> > [1]
> > > >> > >> > and
> > > >> > >> > > I don't think this should be a blocker as it can be
> > > circumvented
> > > >> by
> > > >> > >> > > explicitly setting xsimd_SOURCE=BUNDLED.
> > > >> > >> > > I don't think the incompatibility with C# 7 should be a
> > blocker
> > > >> > either,
> > > >> > >> > it
> > > >> > >> > > should probably be documented that we are not compatible
> with
> > > that
> > > >> > >> > version
> > > >> > >> > > somewhere (if that is not already the case) but otherwise
> it
> > is
> > > >> > fine,
> > > >> > >> > e.g.
> > > >> > >> > > JS is incompatible with nodejs 18.
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33786
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 6:08 PM Rok Mihevc <
> > > rok.mihevc@gmail.com>
> > > >> > >> wrote:
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > > On a relatively fresh Ubuntu 22.04 without conda I had to
> > apt
> > > >> > install
> > > >> > >> > some
> > > >> > >> > > > libs (default-jdk
> > > >> > >> > > > maven libjemalloc-dev libgirepository1.0-dev
> > libsqlite3-dev)
> > > and
> > > >> > this
> > > >> > >> > > > passed fine:
> > > >> > >> > > > TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1
> > > >> > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
> > > >> > >> > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > +1
> > > >> > >> > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > Rok
> > > >> > >> > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 3:05 PM Raúl Cumplido <
> > > >> > >> raulcumplido@gmail.com>
> > > >> > >> > > > wrote:
> > > >> > >> > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > > Thanks Antoine, I can finally reproduce it.
> > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > > Thanks Jacob Wujciak for the pointer on the log, I
> > couldn't
> > > >> find
> > > >> > >> it:
> > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > > -- Building xsimd from source
> > > >> > >> > > > > CMake Error at
> > cmake_modules/ThirdpartyToolchain.cmake:2295
> > > >> > >> > > > (add_library):
> > > >> > >> > > > >   add_library cannot create imported target "xsimd"
> > because
> > > >> > another
> > > >> > >> > > > target
> > > >> > >> > > > >   with the same name already exists.
> > > >> > >> > > > > Call Stack (most recent call first):
> > > >> > >> > > > >   CMakeLists.txt:498 (include)
> > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > > I can reproduce it if I install `apt install
> > libxsimd-dev`.
> > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > > I've opened an issue to track it here:
> > > >> > >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33786
> > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > > Thanks!
> > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > > El jue, 19 ene 2023 a las 13:27, Antoine Pitrou (<
> > > >> > >> antoine@python.org
> > > >> > >> > >)
> > > >> > >> > > > > escribió:
> > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > > > I used the following command:
> > > >> > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > > > LANG=C TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_CPP=1
> > > >> > >> > > > > > ./dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 11.0.0 0
> > > >> > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > > > Here is the full output:
> > > >> > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > https://gist.github.com/pitrou/3fdca2460fa71bba731b0706703b70b2
> > > >> > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > > > Regards
> > > >> > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > > > Antoine.
> > > >> > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > > > Le 19/01/2023 à 13:07, Raúl Cumplido a écrit :
> > > >> > >> > > > > > > El jue, 19 ene 2023 a las 12:21, Antoine Pitrou (<
> > > >> > >> > antoine@python.org
> > > >> > >> > > > >)
> > > >> > >> > > > > > > escribió:
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> On Ubuntu 22.04, C++ source verification *without
> > > conda*
> > > >> > fails
> > > >> > >> > > > because
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> it is attempting to find various libraries (re2,
> > LLVM,
> > > >> > >> > rapidjson,
> > > >> > >> > > > > etc.).
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> Antoine, could you help me understand what the
> issue
> > > is
> > > >> > here
> > > >> > >> or
> > > >> > >> > how
> > > >> > >> > > > to
> > > >> > >> > > > > > > reproduce it? I can't reproduce it.
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > > > > I don't use conda, I use Ubuntu 22.04 and apart
> from
> > > being
> > > >> > able
> > > >> > >> > to
> > > >> > >> > > > > > > reproduce the C# issue if I use .NET 7.0.102 the
> rest
> > > >> looks
> > > >> > >> good
> > > >> > >> > on
> > > >> > >> > > > my
> > > >> > >> > > > > > side
> > > >> > >> > > > > > > (when using old C#):
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > > > > $ TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1
> > > >> > >> > > > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
> > > >> > >> > > > > > > 11.0.0 0
> > > >> > >> > > > > > > ...
> > > >> > >> > > > > > > Release candidate 11.0.0-RC0 looks good!
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> C++ source verification succeeds with conda.
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> Le 19/01/2023 à 11:06, Raúl Cumplido a écrit :
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> Hi,
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> I would like to propose the following release
> > > candidate
> > > >> > (RC0)
> > > >> > >> > of
> > > >> > >> > > > > Apache
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> Arrow version 11.0.0. This is a release
> consisting
> > of
> > > >> 423
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> resolved GitHub issues[1].
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> This release candidate is based on commit:
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> f10f5cfd1376fb0e602334588b3f3624d41dee7d [2]
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> The source release rc0 is hosted at [3].
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> The binary artifacts are hosted at
> > > >> > >> [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> The changelog is located at [12].
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> Please download, verify checksums and signatures,
> > run
> > > >> the
> > > >> > >> unit
> > > >> > >> > > > tests,
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> and vote on the release. See [13] for how to
> > > validate a
> > > >> > >> release
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> candidate.
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> See also a verification result on GitHub pull
> > request
> > > >> > [14].
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow 11.0.0
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [ ] +0
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow 11.0.0
> > > >> > because...
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [1]:
> > > >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/milestone/1?closed=1
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [2]:
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>
> > > >> > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/f10f5cfd1376fb0e602334588b3f3624d41dee7d
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [3]:
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>
> > > >> > >> > > >
> > > >> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-11.0.0-rc0
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [4]:
> > > >> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/almalinux-rc/
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [5]:
> > > >> > >> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/amazon-linux-rc/
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [6]:
> > > >> https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/centos-rc/
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [7]:
> > > >> https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/debian-rc/
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [8]:
> > > >> > >> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/java-rc/11.0.0-rc0
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [9]:
> > > >> > >> >
> https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/nuget-rc/11.0.0-rc0
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [10]:
> > > >> > >> > > >
> > > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/python-rc/11.0.0-rc0
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [11]:
> > > >> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/ubuntu-rc/
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [12]:
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>
> > > >> > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/f10f5cfd1376fb0e602334588b3f3624d41dee7d/CHANGELOG.md
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [13]:
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>
> > > >> > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/How+to+Verify+Release+Candidates
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [14]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33751
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>
> > > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > >> > >> > > >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 11.0.0 - RC0

Posted by Neal Richardson <ne...@gmail.com>.

Conda often happens automatically; looks like there is already a PR:
https://github.com/conda-forge/arrow-cpp-feedstock/pull/941

On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 9:52 AM Raúl Cumplido <ra...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The current status of the post-release tasks. I will keep working on the
> rest of tasks during the next days:
>
> - [done] Update the released milestone Date and set to "Closed" on GitHub
> - [done] Merge changes on release branch to maintenance branch for patch
> releases
> - [done] Add the new release to the Apache Reporter System
> - [done] Upload source
> - [done] Upload binaries
> - [done] Update website
> - [done] Upload JavaScript packages
> - [done] Upload C# packages
> - [done] Upload wheels/sdist to pypi
> - [done] Publish Maven artifacts
> - [in-progress] Update Homebrew packages
> - [in-progress] Update MSYS2 package
> - [] Upload RubyGems
> - [] Update vcpkg port
> - [] Update Conan recipe
> - [] Bump versions
> - [] Update tags for Go modules
> - [] Update docs
> - [] Update version in Apache Arrow Cookbook
> - [] Announce the new release
> - [] Publish release blog posts
> - [] Remove old artifacts
>
> I will need help with the following (and might need help with some of the
> above, I'll ask if needed):
> - [] Make the CPP PARQUET related version as "RELEASED" on JIRA
> - [] Start the new version on JIRA for the related CPP PARQUET version
> - [] Update conda recipes
> - [] Update R packages
>
> Thanks,
> Raúl
>
> El mié, 25 ene 2023 a las 21:07, Sutou Kouhei (<ko...@clear-code.com>)
> escribió:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I did the followings because they require PMC:
> >
> > - Add the new release to the Apache Reporter System
> > - Upload source
> >
> > The current status:
> >
> > - [done] Update the released milestone Date and set to "Closed" on GitHub
> > - [] Make the CPP PARQUET related version as "RELEASED" on JIRA
> > - [] Start the new version on JIRA for the related CPP PARQUET version
> > - [done] Merge changes on release branch to maintenance branch for patch
> > releases
> > - [done] Add the new release to the Apache Reporter System
> > - [done] Upload source
> > - [] Upload binaries
> > - [] Update website
> > - [] Update Homebrew packages
> > - [] Update MSYS2 package
> > - [] Upload RubyGems
> > - [] Upload JavaScript packages
> > - [] Upload C# packages
> > - [] Update conda recipes
> > - [] Upload wheels/sdist to pypi
> > - [] Publish Maven artifacts
> > - [] Update R packages
> > - [] Update vcpkg port
> > - [] Update Conan recipe
> > - [] Bump versions
> > - [] Update tags for Go modules
> > - [] Update docs
> > - [] Update version in Apache Arrow Cookbook
> > - [] Announce the new release
> > - [] Publish release blog posts
> > - [] Remove old artifacts
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > kou
> >
> > In <CA...@mail.gmail.com>
> >   "[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 11.0.0 - RC0" on Wed, 25 Jan 2023
> > 11:17:35 +0100,
> >   Raúl Cumplido <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The result of the vote is successful with 3 +1 binding votes, 3 +1
> > > non-binding votes and no -1 votes.
> > >
> > > I will start with the post release tasks [1] and Kou has volunteered to
> > > help me with the tasks that require PMC.
> > >
> > > Can someone with PARQUET permissions help with the following tasks:
> > > - Make the CPP PARQUET related version as "RELEASED" on JIRA
> > > - Start the new version on JIRA for the related CPP PARQUET version
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Raúl
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
> https://arrow.apache.org/docs/dev/developers/release.html#post-release-tasks
> > >
> > > El dom, 22 ene 2023 a las 18:36, Dewey Dunnington
> > > (<de...@voltrondata.com.invalid>) escribió:
> > >
> > >> Just a note that I wasn't able to produce an error building Arrow C++
> > using
> > >> clang-dev [1]. That isn't to say one doesn't still exist (I will test
> > more
> > >> thoroughly in the coming days), but it does suggest that it's
> something
> > we
> > >> can/should handle at the packaging stage if it does pop up (rather
> than
> > >> block a release).
> > >>
> > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33819
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 8:44 PM Sutou Kouhei <ko...@clear-code.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > > * Fix now, include in an 11.0.0 RC1, start a new vote.
> > >> > > * Proceed with RC0, fix for 12.0.0 (and 11.0.1, should it happen),
> > and
> > >> > > cherry-pick the fix into the bundle we upload to CRAN for 11.0.0.
> > (This
> > >> > is
> > >> > > something we do regularly, not a crazy exception.)
> > >> >
> > >> > We don't find any blocker for 11.0.0 for now. How about
> > >> > releasing 11.0.0 with RC0 and releasing 11.0.1 with clang 16
> > >> > support? (The latter option.)
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > We may want to add a CI job with llvm-toolchain-snapshot
> > >> > https://apt.llvm.org/focal/pool/main/l/llvm-toolchain-snapshot/
> > >> > . We will be able to avoid this situation (Apache Arrow C++
> > >> > doesn't work with unreleased LLVM) with it in future.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > --
> > >> > kou
> > >> >
> > >> > In <
> > CAOCv4hjj_Jzv4fwupdm9DbYjiFVGSv0S96p+VwgSF17efMmD-Q@mail.gmail.com>
> > >> >   "Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 11.0.0 - RC0" on Fri, 20 Jan 2023
> > >> > 10:50:29 -0500,
> > >> >   Neal Richardson <ne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > I received an email this morning from the CRAN maintainers about a
> > C++
> > >> > > build failure on clang 16. Although clang 16 is not scheduled for
> > >> release
> > >> > > until March, CRAN wants to ensure that all packages build
> > successfully
> > >> on
> > >> > > it when it becomes available, so they've given us an ultimatum to
> > fix
> > >> the
> > >> > > issue or face removal.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Whether or not we agree with this policy (not relevant for us to
> > >> discuss
> > >> > > here), we have two options:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > * Fix now, include in an 11.0.0 RC1, start a new vote.
> > >> > > * Proceed with RC0, fix for 12.0.0 (and 11.0.1, should it happen),
> > and
> > >> > > cherry-pick the fix into the bundle we upload to CRAN for 11.0.0.
> > (This
> > >> > is
> > >> > > something we do regularly, not a crazy exception.)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/clang16/README.txt suggests
> that
> > >> the
> > >> > fix
> > >> > > could be as easy as upgrading our bundled boost version, but we
> > won't
> > >> > know
> > >> > > for sure until we reproduce it. We suppress libarrow build output
> on
> > >> > CRAN,
> > >> > > so unfortunately there are no logs from their report.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I'm fine with either option. clang 16 will be out before we do the
> > >> 12.0.0
> > >> > > release, and it would be nice if we compiled successfully on it,
> > but I
> > >> > > don't have strong feelings as to whether that is "nice to have"
> > enough
> > >> to
> > >> > > force an RC1.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Neal
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 8:39 AM Raúl Cumplido <
> > raulcumplido@gmail.com>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> +1 (non binding)
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> I have tested both SOURCES and BINARIES successfully with:
> > >> > >> TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1
> > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
> > >> > 11.0.0
> > >> > >> 0
> > >> > >> TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_WHEELS=1
> > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
> > >> > 11.0.0
> > >> > >> 0
> > >> > >> TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_BINARIES=1
> > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
> > >> > >> 11.0.0 0
> > >> > >> with:
> > >> > >>   * Python 3.10.6
> > >> > >>   * gcc (Ubuntu 11.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 11.3.0
> > >> > >>   * NVIDIA CUDA cuda_11.5.r11.5/compiler.30672275_0
> > >> > >>   * openjdk 17.0.5 2022-10-18
> > >> > >>   * ruby 3.0.2p107 (2021-07-07 revision 0db68f0233)
> > [x86_64-linux-gnu]
> > >> > >>   * dotnet 6.0.202
> > >> > >>   * Ubuntu 22.04 LTS
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> From my understanding the identified issues are not release
> > blockers,
> > >> > >> that's why I am voting +1:
> > >> > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33783
> > >> > >> We are compatible with dotnet 7.0.x but we are only compatible
> > testing
> > >> > with
> > >> > >> 6.0.x. More info on the issue and PR associated.
> > >> > >> [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33786
> > >> > >> XSIMD on Ubuntu, I have tested the proposed workaround and built
> > and
> > >> run
> > >> > >> verification successfully.
> > >> > >> [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/15054
> > >> > >> aws-sdk-cpp leak and flaky test crash. More discussions on the
> > issue
> > >> but
> > >> > >> doesn't seem to be a blocker.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Thanks,
> > >> > >> Raúl
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> El vie, 20 ene 2023 a las 6:06, Weston Pace (<
> > weston.pace@gmail.com>)
> > >> > >> escribió:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > I've got a fix[1] in for the verification script for C#.  There
> > are
> > >> > >> > more details in the issue and the PR but IMO we are compatible
> > with
> > >> > >> > C#7 and C#6, we simply were not testing it correctly.  I have
> run
> > >> the
> > >> > >> > tests locally with both 6.0 and 7.0 sdks and they passed.
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33799
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 5:52 PM Jacob Wujciak
> > >> > >> > <ja...@voltrondata.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > I have investigated the issue of the system xsimd causing an
> > error
> > >> > [1]
> > >> > >> > and
> > >> > >> > > I don't think this should be a blocker as it can be
> > circumvented
> > >> by
> > >> > >> > > explicitly setting xsimd_SOURCE=BUNDLED.
> > >> > >> > > I don't think the incompatibility with C# 7 should be a
> blocker
> > >> > either,
> > >> > >> > it
> > >> > >> > > should probably be documented that we are not compatible with
> > that
> > >> > >> > version
> > >> > >> > > somewhere (if that is not already the case) but otherwise it
> is
> > >> > fine,
> > >> > >> > e.g.
> > >> > >> > > JS is incompatible with nodejs 18.
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33786
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 6:08 PM Rok Mihevc <
> > rok.mihevc@gmail.com>
> > >> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > > On a relatively fresh Ubuntu 22.04 without conda I had to
> apt
> > >> > install
> > >> > >> > some
> > >> > >> > > > libs (default-jdk
> > >> > >> > > > maven libjemalloc-dev libgirepository1.0-dev
> libsqlite3-dev)
> > and
> > >> > this
> > >> > >> > > > passed fine:
> > >> > >> > > > TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1
> > >> > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > > +1
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > > Rok
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 3:05 PM Raúl Cumplido <
> > >> > >> raulcumplido@gmail.com>
> > >> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks Antoine, I can finally reproduce it.
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks Jacob Wujciak for the pointer on the log, I
> couldn't
> > >> find
> > >> > >> it:
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > -- Building xsimd from source
> > >> > >> > > > > CMake Error at
> cmake_modules/ThirdpartyToolchain.cmake:2295
> > >> > >> > > > (add_library):
> > >> > >> > > > >   add_library cannot create imported target "xsimd"
> because
> > >> > another
> > >> > >> > > > target
> > >> > >> > > > >   with the same name already exists.
> > >> > >> > > > > Call Stack (most recent call first):
> > >> > >> > > > >   CMakeLists.txt:498 (include)
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > I can reproduce it if I install `apt install
> libxsimd-dev`.
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > I've opened an issue to track it here:
> > >> > >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33786
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks!
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > El jue, 19 ene 2023 a las 13:27, Antoine Pitrou (<
> > >> > >> antoine@python.org
> > >> > >> > >)
> > >> > >> > > > > escribió:
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > I used the following command:
> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > LANG=C TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_CPP=1
> > >> > >> > > > > > ./dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 11.0.0 0
> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > Here is the full output:
> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > https://gist.github.com/pitrou/3fdca2460fa71bba731b0706703b70b2
> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > Regards
> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > Antoine.
> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > Le 19/01/2023 à 13:07, Raúl Cumplido a écrit :
> > >> > >> > > > > > > El jue, 19 ene 2023 a las 12:21, Antoine Pitrou (<
> > >> > >> > antoine@python.org
> > >> > >> > > > >)
> > >> > >> > > > > > > escribió:
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > >> > > > > > >> On Ubuntu 22.04, C++ source verification *without
> > conda*
> > >> > fails
> > >> > >> > > > because
> > >> > >> > > > > > >> it is attempting to find various libraries (re2,
> LLVM,
> > >> > >> > rapidjson,
> > >> > >> > > > > etc.).
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > >> > > > > > >> Antoine, could you help me understand what the issue
> > is
> > >> > here
> > >> > >> or
> > >> > >> > how
> > >> > >> > > > to
> > >> > >> > > > > > > reproduce it? I can't reproduce it.
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > I don't use conda, I use Ubuntu 22.04 and apart from
> > being
> > >> > able
> > >> > >> > to
> > >> > >> > > > > > > reproduce the C# issue if I use .NET 7.0.102 the rest
> > >> looks
> > >> > >> good
> > >> > >> > on
> > >> > >> > > > my
> > >> > >> > > > > > side
> > >> > >> > > > > > > (when using old C#):
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > > $ TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1
> > >> > >> > > > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
> > >> > >> > > > > > > 11.0.0 0
> > >> > >> > > > > > > ...
> > >> > >> > > > > > > Release candidate 11.0.0-RC0 looks good!
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > > >> C++ source verification succeeds with conda.
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > >> > > > > > >> Le 19/01/2023 à 11:06, Raúl Cumplido a écrit :
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> Hi,
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> I would like to propose the following release
> > candidate
> > >> > (RC0)
> > >> > >> > of
> > >> > >> > > > > Apache
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> Arrow version 11.0.0. This is a release consisting
> of
> > >> 423
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> resolved GitHub issues[1].
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> This release candidate is based on commit:
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> f10f5cfd1376fb0e602334588b3f3624d41dee7d [2]
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> The source release rc0 is hosted at [3].
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> The binary artifacts are hosted at
> > >> > >> [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> The changelog is located at [12].
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> Please download, verify checksums and signatures,
> run
> > >> the
> > >> > >> unit
> > >> > >> > > > tests,
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> and vote on the release. See [13] for how to
> > validate a
> > >> > >> release
> > >> > >> > > > > > >> candidate.
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> See also a verification result on GitHub pull
> request
> > >> > [14].
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow 11.0.0
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [ ] +0
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow 11.0.0
> > >> > because...
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [1]:
> > >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/milestone/1?closed=1
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [2]:
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/f10f5cfd1376fb0e602334588b3f3624d41dee7d
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [3]:
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-11.0.0-rc0
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [4]:
> > >> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/almalinux-rc/
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [5]:
> > >> > >> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/amazon-linux-rc/
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [6]:
> > >> https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/centos-rc/
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [7]:
> > >> https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/debian-rc/
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [8]:
> > >> > >> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/java-rc/11.0.0-rc0
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [9]:
> > >> > >> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/nuget-rc/11.0.0-rc0
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [10]:
> > >> > >> > > >
> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/python-rc/11.0.0-rc0
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [11]:
> > >> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/ubuntu-rc/
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [12]:
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/f10f5cfd1376fb0e602334588b3f3624d41dee7d/CHANGELOG.md
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [13]:
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/How+to+Verify+Release+Candidates
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>> [14]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33751
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >> > > >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
>

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 11.0.0 - RC0

Posted by Raúl Cumplido <ra...@gmail.com>.

Hi,

The current status of the post-release tasks. I will keep working on the
rest of tasks during the next days:

- [done] Update the released milestone Date and set to "Closed" on GitHub
- [done] Merge changes on release branch to maintenance branch for patch
releases
- [done] Add the new release to the Apache Reporter System
- [done] Upload source
- [done] Upload binaries
- [done] Update website
- [done] Upload JavaScript packages
- [done] Upload C# packages
- [done] Upload wheels/sdist to pypi
- [done] Publish Maven artifacts
- [in-progress] Update Homebrew packages
- [in-progress] Update MSYS2 package
- [] Upload RubyGems
- [] Update vcpkg port
- [] Update Conan recipe
- [] Bump versions
- [] Update tags for Go modules
- [] Update docs
- [] Update version in Apache Arrow Cookbook
- [] Announce the new release
- [] Publish release blog posts
- [] Remove old artifacts

I will need help with the following (and might need help with some of the
above, I'll ask if needed):
- [] Make the CPP PARQUET related version as "RELEASED" on JIRA
- [] Start the new version on JIRA for the related CPP PARQUET version
- [] Update conda recipes
- [] Update R packages

Thanks,
Raúl

El mié, 25 ene 2023 a las 21:07, Sutou Kouhei (<ko...@clear-code.com>)
escribió:

> Hi,
>
> I did the followings because they require PMC:
>
> - Add the new release to the Apache Reporter System
> - Upload source
>
> The current status:
>
> - [done] Update the released milestone Date and set to "Closed" on GitHub
> - [] Make the CPP PARQUET related version as "RELEASED" on JIRA
> - [] Start the new version on JIRA for the related CPP PARQUET version
> - [done] Merge changes on release branch to maintenance branch for patch
> releases
> - [done] Add the new release to the Apache Reporter System
> - [done] Upload source
> - [] Upload binaries
> - [] Update website
> - [] Update Homebrew packages
> - [] Update MSYS2 package
> - [] Upload RubyGems
> - [] Upload JavaScript packages
> - [] Upload C# packages
> - [] Update conda recipes
> - [] Upload wheels/sdist to pypi
> - [] Publish Maven artifacts
> - [] Update R packages
> - [] Update vcpkg port
> - [] Update Conan recipe
> - [] Bump versions
> - [] Update tags for Go modules
> - [] Update docs
> - [] Update version in Apache Arrow Cookbook
> - [] Announce the new release
> - [] Publish release blog posts
> - [] Remove old artifacts
>
> Thanks,
> --
> kou
>
> In <CA...@mail.gmail.com>
>   "[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 11.0.0 - RC0" on Wed, 25 Jan 2023
> 11:17:35 +0100,
>   Raúl Cumplido <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The result of the vote is successful with 3 +1 binding votes, 3 +1
> > non-binding votes and no -1 votes.
> >
> > I will start with the post release tasks [1] and Kou has volunteered to
> > help me with the tasks that require PMC.
> >
> > Can someone with PARQUET permissions help with the following tasks:
> > - Make the CPP PARQUET related version as "RELEASED" on JIRA
> > - Start the new version on JIRA for the related CPP PARQUET version
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Raúl
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://arrow.apache.org/docs/dev/developers/release.html#post-release-tasks
> >
> > El dom, 22 ene 2023 a las 18:36, Dewey Dunnington
> > (<de...@voltrondata.com.invalid>) escribió:
> >
> >> Just a note that I wasn't able to produce an error building Arrow C++
> using
> >> clang-dev [1]. That isn't to say one doesn't still exist (I will test
> more
> >> thoroughly in the coming days), but it does suggest that it's something
> we
> >> can/should handle at the packaging stage if it does pop up (rather than
> >> block a release).
> >>
> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33819
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 8:44 PM Sutou Kouhei <ko...@clear-code.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > > * Fix now, include in an 11.0.0 RC1, start a new vote.
> >> > > * Proceed with RC0, fix for 12.0.0 (and 11.0.1, should it happen),
> and
> >> > > cherry-pick the fix into the bundle we upload to CRAN for 11.0.0.
> (This
> >> > is
> >> > > something we do regularly, not a crazy exception.)
> >> >
> >> > We don't find any blocker for 11.0.0 for now. How about
> >> > releasing 11.0.0 with RC0 and releasing 11.0.1 with clang 16
> >> > support? (The latter option.)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > We may want to add a CI job with llvm-toolchain-snapshot
> >> > https://apt.llvm.org/focal/pool/main/l/llvm-toolchain-snapshot/
> >> > . We will be able to avoid this situation (Apache Arrow C++
> >> > doesn't work with unreleased LLVM) with it in future.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > --
> >> > kou
> >> >
> >> > In <
> CAOCv4hjj_Jzv4fwupdm9DbYjiFVGSv0S96p+VwgSF17efMmD-Q@mail.gmail.com>
> >> >   "Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 11.0.0 - RC0" on Fri, 20 Jan 2023
> >> > 10:50:29 -0500,
> >> >   Neal Richardson <ne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I received an email this morning from the CRAN maintainers about a
> C++
> >> > > build failure on clang 16. Although clang 16 is not scheduled for
> >> release
> >> > > until March, CRAN wants to ensure that all packages build
> successfully
> >> on
> >> > > it when it becomes available, so they've given us an ultimatum to
> fix
> >> the
> >> > > issue or face removal.
> >> > >
> >> > > Whether or not we agree with this policy (not relevant for us to
> >> discuss
> >> > > here), we have two options:
> >> > >
> >> > > * Fix now, include in an 11.0.0 RC1, start a new vote.
> >> > > * Proceed with RC0, fix for 12.0.0 (and 11.0.1, should it happen),
> and
> >> > > cherry-pick the fix into the bundle we upload to CRAN for 11.0.0.
> (This
> >> > is
> >> > > something we do regularly, not a crazy exception.)
> >> > >
> >> > > https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/clang16/README.txt suggests that
> >> the
> >> > fix
> >> > > could be as easy as upgrading our bundled boost version, but we
> won't
> >> > know
> >> > > for sure until we reproduce it. We suppress libarrow build output on
> >> > CRAN,
> >> > > so unfortunately there are no logs from their report.
> >> > >
> >> > > I'm fine with either option. clang 16 will be out before we do the
> >> 12.0.0
> >> > > release, and it would be nice if we compiled successfully on it,
> but I
> >> > > don't have strong feelings as to whether that is "nice to have"
> enough
> >> to
> >> > > force an RC1.
> >> > >
> >> > > Neal
> >> > >
> >> > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 8:39 AM Raúl Cumplido <
> raulcumplido@gmail.com>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> +1 (non binding)
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I have tested both SOURCES and BINARIES successfully with:
> >> > >> TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1
> dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
> >> > 11.0.0
> >> > >> 0
> >> > >> TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_WHEELS=1
> dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
> >> > 11.0.0
> >> > >> 0
> >> > >> TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_BINARIES=1
> dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
> >> > >> 11.0.0 0
> >> > >> with:
> >> > >>   * Python 3.10.6
> >> > >>   * gcc (Ubuntu 11.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 11.3.0
> >> > >>   * NVIDIA CUDA cuda_11.5.r11.5/compiler.30672275_0
> >> > >>   * openjdk 17.0.5 2022-10-18
> >> > >>   * ruby 3.0.2p107 (2021-07-07 revision 0db68f0233)
> [x86_64-linux-gnu]
> >> > >>   * dotnet 6.0.202
> >> > >>   * Ubuntu 22.04 LTS
> >> > >>
> >> > >> From my understanding the identified issues are not release
> blockers,
> >> > >> that's why I am voting +1:
> >> > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33783
> >> > >> We are compatible with dotnet 7.0.x but we are only compatible
> testing
> >> > with
> >> > >> 6.0.x. More info on the issue and PR associated.
> >> > >> [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33786
> >> > >> XSIMD on Ubuntu, I have tested the proposed workaround and built
> and
> >> run
> >> > >> verification successfully.
> >> > >> [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/15054
> >> > >> aws-sdk-cpp leak and flaky test crash. More discussions on the
> issue
> >> but
> >> > >> doesn't seem to be a blocker.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Thanks,
> >> > >> Raúl
> >> > >>
> >> > >> El vie, 20 ene 2023 a las 6:06, Weston Pace (<
> weston.pace@gmail.com>)
> >> > >> escribió:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > I've got a fix[1] in for the verification script for C#.  There
> are
> >> > >> > more details in the issue and the PR but IMO we are compatible
> with
> >> > >> > C#7 and C#6, we simply were not testing it correctly.  I have run
> >> the
> >> > >> > tests locally with both 6.0 and 7.0 sdks and they passed.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33799
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 5:52 PM Jacob Wujciak
> >> > >> > <ja...@voltrondata.com.invalid> wrote:
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > I have investigated the issue of the system xsimd causing an
> error
> >> > [1]
> >> > >> > and
> >> > >> > > I don't think this should be a blocker as it can be
> circumvented
> >> by
> >> > >> > > explicitly setting xsimd_SOURCE=BUNDLED.
> >> > >> > > I don't think the incompatibility with C# 7 should be a blocker
> >> > either,
> >> > >> > it
> >> > >> > > should probably be documented that we are not compatible with
> that
> >> > >> > version
> >> > >> > > somewhere (if that is not already the case) but otherwise it is
> >> > fine,
> >> > >> > e.g.
> >> > >> > > JS is incompatible with nodejs 18.
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33786
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 6:08 PM Rok Mihevc <
> rok.mihevc@gmail.com>
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > > On a relatively fresh Ubuntu 22.04 without conda I had to apt
> >> > install
> >> > >> > some
> >> > >> > > > libs (default-jdk
> >> > >> > > > maven libjemalloc-dev libgirepository1.0-dev libsqlite3-dev)
> and
> >> > this
> >> > >> > > > passed fine:
> >> > >> > > > TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1
> >> > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > +1
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > Rok
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 3:05 PM Raúl Cumplido <
> >> > >> raulcumplido@gmail.com>
> >> > >> > > > wrote:
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > > Thanks Antoine, I can finally reproduce it.
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > Thanks Jacob Wujciak for the pointer on the log, I couldn't
> >> find
> >> > >> it:
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > -- Building xsimd from source
> >> > >> > > > > CMake Error at cmake_modules/ThirdpartyToolchain.cmake:2295
> >> > >> > > > (add_library):
> >> > >> > > > >   add_library cannot create imported target "xsimd" because
> >> > another
> >> > >> > > > target
> >> > >> > > > >   with the same name already exists.
> >> > >> > > > > Call Stack (most recent call first):
> >> > >> > > > >   CMakeLists.txt:498 (include)
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > I can reproduce it if I install `apt install libxsimd-dev`.
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > I've opened an issue to track it here:
> >> > >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33786
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > Thanks!
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > El jue, 19 ene 2023 a las 13:27, Antoine Pitrou (<
> >> > >> antoine@python.org
> >> > >> > >)
> >> > >> > > > > escribió:
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > I used the following command:
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > LANG=C TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_CPP=1
> >> > >> > > > > > ./dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 11.0.0 0
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > Here is the full output:
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > https://gist.github.com/pitrou/3fdca2460fa71bba731b0706703b70b2
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > Regards
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > Antoine.
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > Le 19/01/2023 à 13:07, Raúl Cumplido a écrit :
> >> > >> > > > > > > El jue, 19 ene 2023 a las 12:21, Antoine Pitrou (<
> >> > >> > antoine@python.org
> >> > >> > > > >)
> >> > >> > > > > > > escribió:
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > >>
> >> > >> > > > > > >> On Ubuntu 22.04, C++ source verification *without
> conda*
> >> > fails
> >> > >> > > > because
> >> > >> > > > > > >> it is attempting to find various libraries (re2, LLVM,
> >> > >> > rapidjson,
> >> > >> > > > > etc.).
> >> > >> > > > > > >>
> >> > >> > > > > > >> Antoine, could you help me understand what the issue
> is
> >> > here
> >> > >> or
> >> > >> > how
> >> > >> > > > to
> >> > >> > > > > > > reproduce it? I can't reproduce it.
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > I don't use conda, I use Ubuntu 22.04 and apart from
> being
> >> > able
> >> > >> > to
> >> > >> > > > > > > reproduce the C# issue if I use .NET 7.0.102 the rest
> >> looks
> >> > >> good
> >> > >> > on
> >> > >> > > > my
> >> > >> > > > > > side
> >> > >> > > > > > > (when using old C#):
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > $ TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1
> >> > >> > > > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
> >> > >> > > > > > > 11.0.0 0
> >> > >> > > > > > > ...
> >> > >> > > > > > > Release candidate 11.0.0-RC0 looks good!
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > >> C++ source verification succeeds with conda.
> >> > >> > > > > > >>
> >> > >> > > > > > >>
> >> > >> > > > > > >>
> >> > >> > > > > > >> Le 19/01/2023 à 11:06, Raúl Cumplido a écrit :
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> Hi,
> >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> I would like to propose the following release
> candidate
> >> > (RC0)
> >> > >> > of
> >> > >> > > > > Apache
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> Arrow version 11.0.0. This is a release consisting of
> >> 423
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> resolved GitHub issues[1].
> >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> This release candidate is based on commit:
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> f10f5cfd1376fb0e602334588b3f3624d41dee7d [2]
> >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> The source release rc0 is hosted at [3].
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> The binary artifacts are hosted at
> >> > >> [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> The changelog is located at [12].
> >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run
> >> the
> >> > >> unit
> >> > >> > > > tests,
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> and vote on the release. See [13] for how to
> validate a
> >> > >> release
> >> > >> > > > > > >> candidate.
> >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> See also a verification result on GitHub pull request
> >> > [14].
> >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow 11.0.0
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> [ ] +0
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow 11.0.0
> >> > because...
> >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> [1]:
> >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/milestone/1?closed=1
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> [2]:
> >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > >> > > > > > >>
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/f10f5cfd1376fb0e602334588b3f3624d41dee7d
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> [3]:
> >> > >> > > > > > >>
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-11.0.0-rc0
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> [4]:
> >> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/almalinux-rc/
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> [5]:
> >> > >> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/amazon-linux-rc/
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> [6]:
> >> https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/centos-rc/
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> [7]:
> >> https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/debian-rc/
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> [8]:
> >> > >> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/java-rc/11.0.0-rc0
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> [9]:
> >> > >> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/nuget-rc/11.0.0-rc0
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> [10]:
> >> > >> > > >
> https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/python-rc/11.0.0-rc0
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> [11]:
> >> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/ubuntu-rc/
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> [12]:
> >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > >> > > > > > >>
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/f10f5cfd1376fb0e602334588b3f3624d41dee7d/CHANGELOG.md
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> [13]:
> >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > >> > > > > > >>
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/How+to+Verify+Release+Candidates
> >> > >> > > > > > >>> [14]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33751
> >> > >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > >> > > > > > >>
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
>

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 11.0.0 - RC0

Posted by Sutou Kouhei <ko...@clear-code.com>.

Hi,

I did the followings because they require PMC:

- Add the new release to the Apache Reporter System
- Upload source

The current status:

- [done] Update the released milestone Date and set to "Closed" on GitHub
- [] Make the CPP PARQUET related version as "RELEASED" on JIRA
- [] Start the new version on JIRA for the related CPP PARQUET version
- [done] Merge changes on release branch to maintenance branch for patch releases
- [done] Add the new release to the Apache Reporter System
- [done] Upload source
- [] Upload binaries
- [] Update website
- [] Update Homebrew packages
- [] Update MSYS2 package
- [] Upload RubyGems
- [] Upload JavaScript packages
- [] Upload C# packages
- [] Update conda recipes
- [] Upload wheels/sdist to pypi
- [] Publish Maven artifacts
- [] Update R packages
- [] Update vcpkg port
- [] Update Conan recipe
- [] Bump versions
- [] Update tags for Go modules
- [] Update docs
- [] Update version in Apache Arrow Cookbook
- [] Announce the new release
- [] Publish release blog posts
- [] Remove old artifacts

Thanks,
-- 
kou

In <CA...@mail.gmail.com>
  "[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 11.0.0 - RC0" on Wed, 25 Jan 2023 11:17:35 +0100,
  Raúl Cumplido <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> The result of the vote is successful with 3 +1 binding votes, 3 +1
> non-binding votes and no -1 votes.
> 
> I will start with the post release tasks [1] and Kou has volunteered to
> help me with the tasks that require PMC.
> 
> Can someone with PARQUET permissions help with the following tasks:
> - Make the CPP PARQUET related version as "RELEASED" on JIRA
> - Start the new version on JIRA for the related CPP PARQUET version
> 
> Thanks,
> Raúl
> 
> [1]
> https://arrow.apache.org/docs/dev/developers/release.html#post-release-tasks
> 
> El dom, 22 ene 2023 a las 18:36, Dewey Dunnington
> (<de...@voltrondata.com.invalid>) escribió:
> 
>> Just a note that I wasn't able to produce an error building Arrow C++ using
>> clang-dev [1]. That isn't to say one doesn't still exist (I will test more
>> thoroughly in the coming days), but it does suggest that it's something we
>> can/should handle at the packaging stage if it does pop up (rather than
>> block a release).
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33819
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 8:44 PM Sutou Kouhei <ko...@clear-code.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > > * Fix now, include in an 11.0.0 RC1, start a new vote.
>> > > * Proceed with RC0, fix for 12.0.0 (and 11.0.1, should it happen), and
>> > > cherry-pick the fix into the bundle we upload to CRAN for 11.0.0. (This
>> > is
>> > > something we do regularly, not a crazy exception.)
>> >
>> > We don't find any blocker for 11.0.0 for now. How about
>> > releasing 11.0.0 with RC0 and releasing 11.0.1 with clang 16
>> > support? (The latter option.)
>> >
>> >
>> > We may want to add a CI job with llvm-toolchain-snapshot
>> > https://apt.llvm.org/focal/pool/main/l/llvm-toolchain-snapshot/
>> > . We will be able to avoid this situation (Apache Arrow C++
>> > doesn't work with unreleased LLVM) with it in future.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > --
>> > kou
>> >
>> > In <CA...@mail.gmail.com>
>> >   "Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 11.0.0 - RC0" on Fri, 20 Jan 2023
>> > 10:50:29 -0500,
>> >   Neal Richardson <ne...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I received an email this morning from the CRAN maintainers about a C++
>> > > build failure on clang 16. Although clang 16 is not scheduled for
>> release
>> > > until March, CRAN wants to ensure that all packages build successfully
>> on
>> > > it when it becomes available, so they've given us an ultimatum to fix
>> the
>> > > issue or face removal.
>> > >
>> > > Whether or not we agree with this policy (not relevant for us to
>> discuss
>> > > here), we have two options:
>> > >
>> > > * Fix now, include in an 11.0.0 RC1, start a new vote.
>> > > * Proceed with RC0, fix for 12.0.0 (and 11.0.1, should it happen), and
>> > > cherry-pick the fix into the bundle we upload to CRAN for 11.0.0. (This
>> > is
>> > > something we do regularly, not a crazy exception.)
>> > >
>> > > https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/clang16/README.txt suggests that
>> the
>> > fix
>> > > could be as easy as upgrading our bundled boost version, but we won't
>> > know
>> > > for sure until we reproduce it. We suppress libarrow build output on
>> > CRAN,
>> > > so unfortunately there are no logs from their report.
>> > >
>> > > I'm fine with either option. clang 16 will be out before we do the
>> 12.0.0
>> > > release, and it would be nice if we compiled successfully on it, but I
>> > > don't have strong feelings as to whether that is "nice to have" enough
>> to
>> > > force an RC1.
>> > >
>> > > Neal
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 8:39 AM Raúl Cumplido <ra...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> +1 (non binding)
>> > >>
>> > >> I have tested both SOURCES and BINARIES successfully with:
>> > >> TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
>> > 11.0.0
>> > >> 0
>> > >> TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_WHEELS=1 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
>> > 11.0.0
>> > >> 0
>> > >> TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_BINARIES=1 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
>> > >> 11.0.0 0
>> > >> with:
>> > >>   * Python 3.10.6
>> > >>   * gcc (Ubuntu 11.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 11.3.0
>> > >>   * NVIDIA CUDA cuda_11.5.r11.5/compiler.30672275_0
>> > >>   * openjdk 17.0.5 2022-10-18
>> > >>   * ruby 3.0.2p107 (2021-07-07 revision 0db68f0233) [x86_64-linux-gnu]
>> > >>   * dotnet 6.0.202
>> > >>   * Ubuntu 22.04 LTS
>> > >>
>> > >> From my understanding the identified issues are not release blockers,
>> > >> that's why I am voting +1:
>> > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33783
>> > >> We are compatible with dotnet 7.0.x but we are only compatible testing
>> > with
>> > >> 6.0.x. More info on the issue and PR associated.
>> > >> [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33786
>> > >> XSIMD on Ubuntu, I have tested the proposed workaround and built and
>> run
>> > >> verification successfully.
>> > >> [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/15054
>> > >> aws-sdk-cpp leak and flaky test crash. More discussions on the issue
>> but
>> > >> doesn't seem to be a blocker.
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks,
>> > >> Raúl
>> > >>
>> > >> El vie, 20 ene 2023 a las 6:06, Weston Pace (<we...@gmail.com>)
>> > >> escribió:
>> > >>
>> > >> > I've got a fix[1] in for the verification script for C#.  There are
>> > >> > more details in the issue and the PR but IMO we are compatible with
>> > >> > C#7 and C#6, we simply were not testing it correctly.  I have run
>> the
>> > >> > tests locally with both 6.0 and 7.0 sdks and they passed.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33799
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 5:52 PM Jacob Wujciak
>> > >> > <ja...@voltrondata.com.invalid> wrote:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > I have investigated the issue of the system xsimd causing an error
>> > [1]
>> > >> > and
>> > >> > > I don't think this should be a blocker as it can be circumvented
>> by
>> > >> > > explicitly setting xsimd_SOURCE=BUNDLED.
>> > >> > > I don't think the incompatibility with C# 7 should be a blocker
>> > either,
>> > >> > it
>> > >> > > should probably be documented that we are not compatible with that
>> > >> > version
>> > >> > > somewhere (if that is not already the case) but otherwise it is
>> > fine,
>> > >> > e.g.
>> > >> > > JS is incompatible with nodejs 18.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33786
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 6:08 PM Rok Mihevc <ro...@gmail.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > > On a relatively fresh Ubuntu 22.04 without conda I had to apt
>> > install
>> > >> > some
>> > >> > > > libs (default-jdk
>> > >> > > > maven libjemalloc-dev libgirepository1.0-dev libsqlite3-dev) and
>> > this
>> > >> > > > passed fine:
>> > >> > > > TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1
>> > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > +1
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > Rok
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 3:05 PM Raúl Cumplido <
>> > >> raulcumplido@gmail.com>
>> > >> > > > wrote:
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > > Thanks Antoine, I can finally reproduce it.
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > Thanks Jacob Wujciak for the pointer on the log, I couldn't
>> find
>> > >> it:
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > -- Building xsimd from source
>> > >> > > > > CMake Error at cmake_modules/ThirdpartyToolchain.cmake:2295
>> > >> > > > (add_library):
>> > >> > > > >   add_library cannot create imported target "xsimd" because
>> > another
>> > >> > > > target
>> > >> > > > >   with the same name already exists.
>> > >> > > > > Call Stack (most recent call first):
>> > >> > > > >   CMakeLists.txt:498 (include)
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > I can reproduce it if I install `apt install libxsimd-dev`.
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > I've opened an issue to track it here:
>> > >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33786
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > Thanks!
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > El jue, 19 ene 2023 a las 13:27, Antoine Pitrou (<
>> > >> antoine@python.org
>> > >> > >)
>> > >> > > > > escribió:
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > I used the following command:
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > LANG=C TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_CPP=1
>> > >> > > > > > ./dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 11.0.0 0
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > Here is the full output:
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > https://gist.github.com/pitrou/3fdca2460fa71bba731b0706703b70b2
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > Regards
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > Antoine.
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > Le 19/01/2023 à 13:07, Raúl Cumplido a écrit :
>> > >> > > > > > > El jue, 19 ene 2023 a las 12:21, Antoine Pitrou (<
>> > >> > antoine@python.org
>> > >> > > > >)
>> > >> > > > > > > escribió:
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > >>
>> > >> > > > > > >> On Ubuntu 22.04, C++ source verification *without conda*
>> > fails
>> > >> > > > because
>> > >> > > > > > >> it is attempting to find various libraries (re2, LLVM,
>> > >> > rapidjson,
>> > >> > > > > etc.).
>> > >> > > > > > >>
>> > >> > > > > > >> Antoine, could you help me understand what the issue is
>> > here
>> > >> or
>> > >> > how
>> > >> > > > to
>> > >> > > > > > > reproduce it? I can't reproduce it.
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > I don't use conda, I use Ubuntu 22.04 and apart from being
>> > able
>> > >> > to
>> > >> > > > > > > reproduce the C# issue if I use .NET 7.0.102 the rest
>> looks
>> > >> good
>> > >> > on
>> > >> > > > my
>> > >> > > > > > side
>> > >> > > > > > > (when using old C#):
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > $ TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1
>> > >> > > > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
>> > >> > > > > > > 11.0.0 0
>> > >> > > > > > > ...
>> > >> > > > > > > Release candidate 11.0.0-RC0 looks good!
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > >> C++ source verification succeeds with conda.
>> > >> > > > > > >>
>> > >> > > > > > >>
>> > >> > > > > > >>
>> > >> > > > > > >> Le 19/01/2023 à 11:06, Raúl Cumplido a écrit :
>> > >> > > > > > >>> Hi,
>> > >> > > > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > > > >>> I would like to propose the following release candidate
>> > (RC0)
>> > >> > of
>> > >> > > > > Apache
>> > >> > > > > > >>> Arrow version 11.0.0. This is a release consisting of
>> 423
>> > >> > > > > > >>> resolved GitHub issues[1].
>> > >> > > > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > > > >>> This release candidate is based on commit:
>> > >> > > > > > >>> f10f5cfd1376fb0e602334588b3f3624d41dee7d [2]
>> > >> > > > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > > > >>> The source release rc0 is hosted at [3].
>> > >> > > > > > >>> The binary artifacts are hosted at
>> > >> [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].
>> > >> > > > > > >>> The changelog is located at [12].
>> > >> > > > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > > > >>> Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run
>> the
>> > >> unit
>> > >> > > > tests,
>> > >> > > > > > >>> and vote on the release. See [13] for how to validate a
>> > >> release
>> > >> > > > > > >> candidate.
>> > >> > > > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > > > >>> See also a verification result on GitHub pull request
>> > [14].
>> > >> > > > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > > > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> > >> > > > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > > > >>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow 11.0.0
>> > >> > > > > > >>> [ ] +0
>> > >> > > > > > >>> [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow 11.0.0
>> > because...
>> > >> > > > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > > > >>> [1]:
>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/milestone/1?closed=1
>> > >> > > > > > >>> [2]:
>> > >> > > > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > > > >>
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/f10f5cfd1376fb0e602334588b3f3624d41dee7d
>> > >> > > > > > >>> [3]:
>> > >> > > > > > >>
>> > >> > > >
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-11.0.0-rc0
>> > >> > > > > > >>> [4]:
>> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/almalinux-rc/
>> > >> > > > > > >>> [5]:
>> > >> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/amazon-linux-rc/
>> > >> > > > > > >>> [6]:
>> https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/centos-rc/
>> > >> > > > > > >>> [7]:
>> https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/debian-rc/
>> > >> > > > > > >>> [8]:
>> > >> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/java-rc/11.0.0-rc0
>> > >> > > > > > >>> [9]:
>> > >> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/nuget-rc/11.0.0-rc0
>> > >> > > > > > >>> [10]:
>> > >> > > > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/python-rc/11.0.0-rc0
>> > >> > > > > > >>> [11]:
>> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/ubuntu-rc/
>> > >> > > > > > >>> [12]:
>> > >> > > > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > > > >>
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/f10f5cfd1376fb0e602334588b3f3624d41dee7d/CHANGELOG.md
>> > >> > > > > > >>> [13]:
>> > >> > > > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > > > >>
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/How+to+Verify+Release+Candidates
>> > >> > > > > > >>> [14]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33751
>> > >> > > > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > > > >>
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>>