You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@felix.apache.org by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org> on 2008/01/07 11:04:37 UTC
Preparing the org.osgi.foundation release
Hi,
I just looked into the org.osgi.foundation module in order to have a
first 1.0.0 release. (this one is needed for releasing the compendium).
From my pov it seems that license and notice (and everything else) is
fine, so we could just release.
WDYT?
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziegeler@apache.org
Re: Preparing the org.osgi.foundation release
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
Richard S. Hall wrote:
> Yes, I think we are fine to release this. I can commit the R4.1 version
> of ee.foundation right now if you want.
>
Yes, that would be cool!
Thanks
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziegeler@apache.org
Re: Preparing the org.osgi.foundation release
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
Yes, I think we are fine to release this. I can commit the R4.1 version
of ee.foundation right now if you want.
-> richard
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just looked into the org.osgi.foundation module in order to have a
> first 1.0.0 release. (this one is needed for releasing the compendium).
>
> From my pov it seems that license and notice (and everything else) is
> fine, so we could just release.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Carsten
>
Re: Preparing the org.osgi.foundation release
Posted by Felix Meschberger <fm...@gmail.com>.
Definitely +1
Regards and Thanks
Felix
Am Montag, den 07.01.2008, 11:04 +0100 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler:
> Hi,
>
> I just looked into the org.osgi.foundation module in order to have a
> first 1.0.0 release. (this one is needed for releasing the compendium).
>
> From my pov it seems that license and notice (and everything else) is
> fine, so we could just release.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Carsten
>
Re: Preparing the org.osgi.foundation release
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
Stefano Lenzi wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply. I know that we have almost released the
> artifact, but I want to clarify that my idea wasn't to change the
> source but only to packaged them in way such that the artifact's user
> may distinguish between different OSGi profile (CDC-1.1/Foundation-1.1
> and OSGi/Minimum-1.1) and version. Also I would like to use the same
> version number used by the OSGi Specification, so in our case 1.1.0
> instead of 1.0.0.
Sounds reasonable...for the release, however, we only need the
foundation profile, so we can probably just go with that, but in the
future we can look into it. Please come up with a proposal.
> The org.osgi.foundation could be also used for checking during the
> compilation phase which bundle are require only the EE defined by OSGi
> and which bundle require standard JRE.
Yes, I would definitely like to do this...we have talked about it
before, but I am not sure anyone knows how to modify our pom file to
make it happen.
-> richard
>
> Ciao,
> Stefano "Kismet" Lenzi
>
Re: Preparing the org.osgi.foundation release
Posted by Stefano Lenzi <ki...@interfree.it>.
Richard S. Hall wrote:
> Lucas Galfaso wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Would it be possible to upgrade org.osgi.foundation to
>> CDC-1.1/Foundation-1.1? This change would make it possible to use this
>> execution environment to compile Felix.
>>
>
> We are using the source provided by the OSGi Alliance, so we are not
> free to just change it to whatever we want. This is the Foundation
> execution environment supported by the OSGi Alliance. The best we can do
> is update to the latest source made available for R4.1.
Sorry for the late reply. I know that we have almost released the
artifact, but I want to clarify that my idea wasn't to change the source
but only to packaged them in way such that the artifact's user may
distinguish between different OSGi profile (CDC-1.1/Foundation-1.1 and
OSGi/Minimum-1.1) and version. Also I would like to use the same version
number used by the OSGi Specification, so in our case 1.1.0 instead of
1.0.0.
>
> The main purpose for us having this in the repo is so that we can use
> the compendium classes, which have some dependencies on it.
The org.osgi.foundation could be also used for checking during the
compilation phase which bundle are require only the EE defined by OSGi
and which bundle require standard JRE.
Ciao,
Stefano "Kismet" Lenzi
Re: Preparing the org.osgi.foundation release
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> do you want me to wait with the first release of the foundation
> package so our first release will contain the latest R4.1 code?
> Or should I go ahead and release the current version and we can then
> do another release as soon as you updated the code?
I don't think there were any significant changes, so I don't think it is
too important to wait. Since no one responded saying they wanted me to
commit the latest version, I would say it is safe to move ahead with the
current version.
-> richard
>
> Carsten
>
> Richard S. Hall wrote:
>> Lucas Galfaso wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Would it be possible to upgrade org.osgi.foundation to
>>> CDC-1.1/Foundation-1.1? This change would make it possible to use this
>>> execution environment to compile Felix.
>>>
>>
>> We are using the source provided by the OSGi Alliance, so we are not
>> free to just change it to whatever we want. This is the Foundation
>> execution environment supported by the OSGi Alliance. The best we can
>> do is update to the latest source made available for R4.1.
>>
>> The main purpose for us having this in the repo is so that we can use
>> the compendium classes, which have some dependencies on it.
>>
>
>
>
Re: Preparing the org.osgi.foundation release
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
Hi Richard,
do you want me to wait with the first release of the foundation package
so our first release will contain the latest R4.1 code?
Or should I go ahead and release the current version and we can then do
another release as soon as you updated the code?
Carsten
Richard S. Hall wrote:
> Lucas Galfaso wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Would it be possible to upgrade org.osgi.foundation to
>> CDC-1.1/Foundation-1.1? This change would make it possible to use this
>> execution environment to compile Felix.
>>
>
> We are using the source provided by the OSGi Alliance, so we are not
> free to just change it to whatever we want. This is the Foundation
> execution environment supported by the OSGi Alliance. The best we can do
> is update to the latest source made available for R4.1.
>
> The main purpose for us having this in the repo is so that we can use
> the compendium classes, which have some dependencies on it.
>
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziegeler@apache.org
Re: Preparing the org.osgi.foundation release
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
Lucas Galfaso wrote:
> Hi,
> Would it be possible to upgrade org.osgi.foundation to
> CDC-1.1/Foundation-1.1? This change would make it possible to use this
> execution environment to compile Felix.
>
We are using the source provided by the OSGi Alliance, so we are not
free to just change it to whatever we want. This is the Foundation
execution environment supported by the OSGi Alliance. The best we can do
is update to the latest source made available for R4.1.
The main purpose for us having this in the repo is so that we can use
the compendium classes, which have some dependencies on it.
-> richard
> Regards,
> Lucas
>
> On Jan 7, 2008 8:26 AM, Stuart McCulloch <st...@jayway.net> wrote:
>
>> On 07/01/2008, Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I just looked into the org.osgi.foundation module in order to have a
>>> first 1.0.0 release. (this one is needed for releasing the compendium).
>>>
>>> From my pov it seems that license and notice (and everything else) is
>>> fine, so we could just release.
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>>
>> +1, looks ok according to rat
>>
>>
>> Carsten
>>
>>> --
>>> Carsten Ziegeler
>>> cziegeler@apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers, Stuart
>>
>>
Re: Preparing the org.osgi.foundation release
Posted by Stefano Lenzi <ki...@interfree.it>.
Lucas Galfaso wrote:
> Hi,
> Would it be possible to upgrade org.osgi.foundation to
> CDC-1.1/Foundation-1.1? This change would make it possible to use this
> execution environment to compile Felix.
+1
>
> Regards,
> Lucas
Re: Preparing the org.osgi.foundation release
Posted by Stefano Lenzi <ki...@interfree.it>.
Lucas Galfaso wrote:
> Hi,
> Would it be possible to upgrade org.osgi.foundation to
> CDC-1.1/Foundation-1.1? This change would make it possible to use this
> execution environment to compile Felix.
Before I pressed the send button too early, about the
org.osgi.foundation artifact I think that we should improve it a little
while...
I think would be nice if we can release artifact which can be
distinguished either by CDC-1.1/Foundation-1.1 and OSGi/Minimum-1.1 but
also from the foundation classes defined either by OSGi R4 release
4.0.0, 4.0.1 and 4.1.0
So my question are:
- Are we planning to support all the configuration of the foundation
packages defined by OSGi Alliance?
- Do we have to use classified for uniquely identify all the version
or is better if we split the org.osgi.foundation in several pieces?re
>
> Regards,
> Lucas
>
> On Jan 7, 2008 8:26 AM, Stuart McCulloch <st...@jayway.net> wrote:
>> On 07/01/2008, Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I just looked into the org.osgi.foundation module in order to have a
>>> first 1.0.0 release. (this one is needed for releasing the compendium).
>>>
>>> From my pov it seems that license and notice (and everything else) is
>>> fine, so we could just release.
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>
>> +1, looks ok according to rat
>>
>>
>> Carsten
>>> --
>>> Carsten Ziegeler
>>> cziegeler@apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers, Stuart
>>
>
>
Re: Preparing the org.osgi.foundation release
Posted by Stefano Lenzi <ki...@interfree.it>.
Lucas Galfaso wrote:
> Hi,
> Would it be possible to upgrade org.osgi.foundation to
> CDC-1.1/Foundation-1.1? This change would make it possible to use this
> execution environment to compile Felix.
Before I pressed the send button too early, about the
org.osgi.foundation artifact I think that we should improve it a little
while...
I think would be nice if we can release artifact which can be
distinguished either by CDC-1.1/Foundation-1.1 and OSGi/Minimum-1.1 but
also from the foundation classes defined either by OSGi R4 release
4.0.0, 4.0.1 and 4.1.0
So my question are:
- Are we planning to support all the configuration of the foundation
packages defined by OSGi Alliance?
- Do we have to use classified for uniquely identify all the version
or is better if we split the org.osgi.foundation in several pieces?
Ciao,
Stefano "Kismet" Lenzi
>
> Regards,
> Lucas
Re: Preparing the org.osgi.foundation release
Posted by Lucas Galfaso <lg...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Would it be possible to upgrade org.osgi.foundation to
CDC-1.1/Foundation-1.1? This change would make it possible to use this
execution environment to compile Felix.
Regards,
Lucas
On Jan 7, 2008 8:26 AM, Stuart McCulloch <st...@jayway.net> wrote:
> On 07/01/2008, Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just looked into the org.osgi.foundation module in order to have a
> > first 1.0.0 release. (this one is needed for releasing the compendium).
> >
> > From my pov it seems that license and notice (and everything else) is
> > fine, so we could just release.
> >
> > WDYT?
>
>
> +1, looks ok according to rat
>
>
> Carsten
> >
> > --
> > Carsten Ziegeler
> > cziegeler@apache.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers, Stuart
>
Re: Preparing the org.osgi.foundation release
Posted by Stuart McCulloch <st...@jayway.net>.
On 07/01/2008, Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just looked into the org.osgi.foundation module in order to have a
> first 1.0.0 release. (this one is needed for releasing the compendium).
>
> From my pov it seems that license and notice (and everything else) is
> fine, so we could just release.
>
> WDYT?
+1, looks ok according to rat
Carsten
>
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> cziegeler@apache.org
>
--
Cheers, Stuart