Re: [Kernel2.2] Source Resolving

[Stefano Mazzocchi <st...@apache.org>]

Pier Fumagalli wrote:

> On 31 Mar 2004, at 17:52, Ralph Goers wrote:
> 
>> Sorry for jumping in,
> 
> 
> Jumping in is always good, no matter what, it makes you see things from 
> different perspectives...
> 
>>  and maybe this is what you meant, but the framework
>> should supply the resolver framework and then individual resolver
>> implementations for the basic protocols (http:, file:, ftp:, etc.).
> 
> 
> Oh, yes... I mean, the individual protocol resolvers should absolutely 
> be individual blocks. I'm just wondering if that kind of source 
> resolution should be provided by the framework through its interfaces, 
> or whether it simply should be simply delegated to a block required by 
> other blocks (same thing works for logging as well).

I think this is a valid point of discussion.

Pier, go ahead and finish what you are up to now at that point we'll 
discuss how to move forward on this issue.

-- 
Stefano.