You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tapestry.apache.org by Otho <ta...@googlemail.com> on 2009/02/03 19:27:26 UTC
[T5] Tap5<->Grails integration?
Hi all,
I don't know if it is even conceptionally or technically possible, so my
suggestion may seem a bit strange. But would it be possible to integrate
grails and Tapestry in the way it was done with wicket? Aka Tapestry as a
GUI plugin?
I think that would be a huge popularity boost. The simplicity and elegance
Tapestry has to offer in many areas combined with some of the neat ideas in
grails would create a really powerful stack.
What do you think about that?
Regards,
Otho
Re: [T5] Tap5<->Grails integration?
Posted by Carl Crowder <ca...@taptu.com>.
It has come up a few times - have a read of the previous posts to this
mailing list:
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=grails+site%3Amail-archives.apache.org%2Fmod_mbox%2Ftapestry-users%2F
Carl
Otho wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I don't know if it is even conceptionally or technically possible, so my
> suggestion may seem a bit strange. But would it be possible to integrate
> grails and Tapestry in the way it was done with wicket? Aka Tapestry as a
> GUI plugin?
>
> I think that would be a huge popularity boost. The simplicity and elegance
> Tapestry has to offer in many areas combined with some of the neat ideas in
> grails would create a really powerful stack.
>
> What do you think about that?
>
> Regards,
> Otho
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [T5] Tap5<->Grails integration?
Posted by Otho <ta...@googlemail.com>.
No problem at all Carl, I didn't understand it in that way. I just wanted to
say, that with the speed of development in the concerned OSS frameworks it
could very well be that a new consideration could yield a new outcome.
2009/2/3 Carl Crowder <ca...@taptu.com>
> Sorry Otho, I wasn't attempting to prevent discussion, I just wanted to
> point it out in order to add to the discussion.
>
>
> Otho wrote:
>
>> Grails specifically. Groovy as such is possible right now. In the simple
>> cases I tested there were no glitches. But some frameworks can serve right
>> now as frontend to grails. As I said, I have no idea of the technical
>> implications which an integration of Tapestry would require, but I am
>> sure,
>> that - if possible - it would benefit both but especially Tapestry by a
>> large margin. Grails' mailinglist is in this account only 2 months longer
>> but has more than double the posts. If you subtract the Tap4 related posts
>> in this time from the mailinglist it is more like 3 or even 4:1. So there
>> is
>> an active and large userbase and at least for me Tapestry would definitely
>> be the ui/service plugin of choice when starting a Grails production
>> project.
>>
>> Carl, in the portion of the mailinglist I have here in my account (since
>> may
>> 07) there was no such discussion and that means that it was maybe
>> concerning
>> versions of grails up to version 0.3 or so. Grails developed since then
>> and
>> so did Tapestry. I don't think it would harm to reconsider it taking the
>> latest developments into account. E.g. the embracement of Grails by
>> SpringSource.
>>
>
> Regards,
>> Otho
>>
>> 2009/2/3 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <th...@gmail.com>
>>
>> Grails specifically or Groovy?
>>>
>>> Em Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:27:26 -0300, Otho <ta...@googlemail.com>
>>> escreveu:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>> I don't know if it is even conceptionally or technically possible, so my
>>>> suggestion may seem a bit strange. But would it be possible to integrate
>>>> grails and Tapestry in the way it was done with wicket? Aka Tapestry as
>>>> a
>>>> GUI plugin?
>>>>
>>>> I think that would be a huge popularity boost. The simplicity and
>>>> elegance
>>>> Tapestry has to offer in many areas combined with some of the neat ideas
>>>> in
>>>> grails would create a really powerful stack.
>>>>
>>>> What do you think about that?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Otho
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
>>> Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
>>> Consultor, desenvolvedor e instrutor em Java
>>> http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
>
Re: [T5] Tap5<->Grails integration?
Posted by Carl Crowder <ca...@taptu.com>.
Sorry Otho, I wasn't attempting to prevent discussion, I just wanted to
point it out in order to add to the discussion.
Otho wrote:
> Grails specifically. Groovy as such is possible right now. In the simple
> cases I tested there were no glitches. But some frameworks can serve right
> now as frontend to grails. As I said, I have no idea of the technical
> implications which an integration of Tapestry would require, but I am sure,
> that - if possible - it would benefit both but especially Tapestry by a
> large margin. Grails' mailinglist is in this account only 2 months longer
> but has more than double the posts. If you subtract the Tap4 related posts
> in this time from the mailinglist it is more like 3 or even 4:1. So there is
> an active and large userbase and at least for me Tapestry would definitely
> be the ui/service plugin of choice when starting a Grails production
> project.
>
> Carl, in the portion of the mailinglist I have here in my account (since may
> 07) there was no such discussion and that means that it was maybe concerning
> versions of grails up to version 0.3 or so. Grails developed since then and
> so did Tapestry. I don't think it would harm to reconsider it taking the
> latest developments into account. E.g. the embracement of Grails by
> SpringSource.
> Regards,
> Otho
>
> 2009/2/3 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <th...@gmail.com>
>
>> Grails specifically or Groovy?
>>
>> Em Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:27:26 -0300, Otho <ta...@googlemail.com> escreveu:
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>> I don't know if it is even conceptionally or technically possible, so my
>>> suggestion may seem a bit strange. But would it be possible to integrate
>>> grails and Tapestry in the way it was done with wicket? Aka Tapestry as a
>>> GUI plugin?
>>>
>>> I think that would be a huge popularity boost. The simplicity and elegance
>>> Tapestry has to offer in many areas combined with some of the neat ideas
>>> in
>>> grails would create a really powerful stack.
>>>
>>> What do you think about that?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Otho
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
>> Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
>> Consultor, desenvolvedor e instrutor em Java
>> http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [T5] Tap5<->Grails integration?
Posted by Otho <ta...@googlemail.com>.
Grails specifically. Groovy as such is possible right now. In the simple
cases I tested there were no glitches. But some frameworks can serve right
now as frontend to grails. As I said, I have no idea of the technical
implications which an integration of Tapestry would require, but I am sure,
that - if possible - it would benefit both but especially Tapestry by a
large margin. Grails' mailinglist is in this account only 2 months longer
but has more than double the posts. If you subtract the Tap4 related posts
in this time from the mailinglist it is more like 3 or even 4:1. So there is
an active and large userbase and at least for me Tapestry would definitely
be the ui/service plugin of choice when starting a Grails production
project.
Carl, in the portion of the mailinglist I have here in my account (since may
07) there was no such discussion and that means that it was maybe concerning
versions of grails up to version 0.3 or so. Grails developed since then and
so did Tapestry. I don't think it would harm to reconsider it taking the
latest developments into account. E.g. the embracement of Grails by
SpringSource.
Regards,
Otho
2009/2/3 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <th...@gmail.com>
> Grails specifically or Groovy?
>
> Em Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:27:26 -0300, Otho <ta...@googlemail.com> escreveu:
>
>
> Hi all,
>>
>> I don't know if it is even conceptionally or technically possible, so my
>> suggestion may seem a bit strange. But would it be possible to integrate
>> grails and Tapestry in the way it was done with wicket? Aka Tapestry as a
>> GUI plugin?
>>
>> I think that would be a huge popularity boost. The simplicity and elegance
>> Tapestry has to offer in many areas combined with some of the neat ideas
>> in
>> grails would create a really powerful stack.
>>
>> What do you think about that?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Otho
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
> Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
> Consultor, desenvolvedor e instrutor em Java
> http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
>
Re: [T5] Tap5<->Grails integration?
Posted by "Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo" <th...@gmail.com>.
Grails specifically or Groovy?
Em Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:27:26 -0300, Otho <ta...@googlemail.com> escreveu:
> Hi all,
>
> I don't know if it is even conceptionally or technically possible, so my
> suggestion may seem a bit strange. But would it be possible to integrate
> grails and Tapestry in the way it was done with wicket? Aka Tapestry as a
> GUI plugin?
>
> I think that would be a huge popularity boost. The simplicity and
> elegance
> Tapestry has to offer in many areas combined with some of the neat ideas
> in
> grails would create a really powerful stack.
>
> What do you think about that?
>
> Regards,
> Otho
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
Consultor, desenvolvedor e instrutor em Java
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org