You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Stu Hood (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/09/22 12:01:27 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-3237) refactor super column
implmentation to use composite column names instead
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112452#comment-13112452 ]
Stu Hood commented on CASSANDRA-3237:
-------------------------------------
In order to continue to support the existing API (delete the children of this parent), we'll need to add an internal representation of deleted slices. CASSANDRA-674 can persist them, but ColumnFamily would also need a slice tombstones list.
> refactor super column implmentation to use composite column names instead
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-3237
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3237
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Matthew F. Dennis
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: ponies
>
> super columns are annoying. composite columns offer a better API and performance. people should use composites over super columns. some people are already using super columns. C* should implement the super column API in terms of composites to reduce code, complexity and testing as well as increase performance.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira