You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Stu Hood (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/09/22 12:01:27 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-3237) refactor super column implmentation to use composite column names instead

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112452#comment-13112452 ] 

Stu Hood commented on CASSANDRA-3237:
-------------------------------------

In order to continue to support the existing API (delete the children of this parent), we'll need to add an internal representation of deleted slices. CASSANDRA-674 can persist them, but ColumnFamily would also need a slice tombstones list.

> refactor super column implmentation to use composite column names instead
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-3237
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3237
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Matthew F. Dennis
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: ponies
>
> super columns are annoying.  composite columns offer a better API and performance.  people should use composites over super columns.  some people are already using super columns.  C* should implement the super column API in terms of composites to reduce code, complexity and testing as well as increase performance.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira