You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geode.apache.org by William Markito <wm...@pivotal.io> on 2016/03/16 05:41:34 UTC
Can we close GEODE-36 ? (Gfsh renaming)
Howdy!
Looks like we had this discussion in the past but given my own current
understanding of the impacts and needs for such change, I'd like to ask if
we can close GEODE-36 with the changes Nitin already did to display the
product name properly and keep it as is...
We can even update the banner if that's a thing, but I'm giving my +1 to
keep it gfsh.
o o
/^^^^^7
' ' ,oO))))))))Oo,
,'))))))))))))))), /{
' ,'o ))))))))))))))))={
> ))))))))))))))))={
`, ))))))\ \)))))))={
',))))))))\/)))))' \{
'*O))))))))O*'
--
~/William
Re: Can we close GEODE-36 ? (Gfsh renaming)
Posted by Bruce Schuchardt <bs...@pivotal.io>.
+1
Plus, thanks for the word "backronym" Nitin
Le 3/16/2016 8:22 AM, Nitin Lamba a écrit :
> +1
>
> BTW, love Anthony's backronym[1] for gfsh!
>
> Nitin
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backronym
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 8:05 AM
> To: dev@geode.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Can we close GEODE-36 ? (Gfsh renaming)
>
> +1
>
> On Wednesday, March 16, 2016, Anthony Baker <ab...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> I think Geode Fabulous SHell is a reasonable name. Changing it generates
>> a ton of work both in the code and documentation without much benefit IMO.
>>
>> Link to the original discussion:
>>
>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-geode-dev/201505.mbox/%3cCAF3UAT1FRANKyLUXeSG-m6yNXnTyw=3heo5350vF-80hvfZWYg@mail.gmail.com%3e
>>
>> Anthony
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 15, 2016, at 9:41 PM, William Markito <wmarkito@pivotal.io
>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>> Howdy!
>>>
>>> Looks like we had this discussion in the past but given my own current
>>> understanding of the impacts and needs for such change, I'd like to ask
>> if
>>> we can close GEODE-36 with the changes Nitin already did to display the
>>> product name properly and keep it as is...
>>>
>>>
>>> We can even update the banner if that's a thing, but I'm giving my +1 to
>>> keep it gfsh.
>>>
>>> o o
>>> /^^^^^7
>>> ' ' ,oO))))))))Oo,
>>> ,'))))))))))))))), /{
>>> ' ,'o ))))))))))))))))={
>>>> ))))))))))))))))={
>>> `, ))))))\ \)))))))={
>>> ',))))))))\/)))))' \{
>>> '*O))))))))O*'
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> ~/William
> >
Re: Can we close GEODE-36 ? (Gfsh renaming)
Posted by Nitin Lamba <ni...@ampool.io>.
+1
BTW, love Anthony's backronym[1] for gfsh!
Nitin
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backronym
________________________________________
From: Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 8:05 AM
To: dev@geode.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can we close GEODE-36 ? (Gfsh renaming)
+1
On Wednesday, March 16, 2016, Anthony Baker <ab...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> +1
>
> I think Geode Fabulous SHell is a reasonable name. Changing it generates
> a ton of work both in the code and documentation without much benefit IMO.
>
> Link to the original discussion:
>
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-geode-dev/201505.mbox/%3cCAF3UAT1FRANKyLUXeSG-m6yNXnTyw=3heo5350vF-80hvfZWYg@mail.gmail.com%3e
>
> Anthony
>
>
> > On Mar 15, 2016, at 9:41 PM, William Markito <wmarkito@pivotal.io
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > Howdy!
> >
> > Looks like we had this discussion in the past but given my own current
> > understanding of the impacts and needs for such change, I'd like to ask
> if
> > we can close GEODE-36 with the changes Nitin already did to display the
> > product name properly and keep it as is...
> >
> >
> > We can even update the banner if that's a thing, but I'm giving my +1 to
> > keep it gfsh.
> >
> > o o
> > /^^^^^7
> > ' ' ,oO))))))))Oo,
> > ,'))))))))))))))), /{
> > ' ,'o ))))))))))))))))={
> >> ))))))))))))))))={
> > `, ))))))\ \)))))))={
> > ',))))))))\/)))))' \{
> > '*O))))))))O*'
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > ~/William
>
>
Re: Can we close GEODE-36 ? (Gfsh renaming)
Posted by Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org>.
+1
On Wednesday, March 16, 2016, Anthony Baker <ab...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> +1
>
> I think Geode Fabulous SHell is a reasonable name. Changing it generates
> a ton of work both in the code and documentation without much benefit IMO.
>
> Link to the original discussion:
>
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-geode-dev/201505.mbox/%3cCAF3UAT1FRANKyLUXeSG-m6yNXnTyw=3heo5350vF-80hvfZWYg@mail.gmail.com%3e
>
> Anthony
>
>
> > On Mar 15, 2016, at 9:41 PM, William Markito <wmarkito@pivotal.io
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > Howdy!
> >
> > Looks like we had this discussion in the past but given my own current
> > understanding of the impacts and needs for such change, I'd like to ask
> if
> > we can close GEODE-36 with the changes Nitin already did to display the
> > product name properly and keep it as is...
> >
> >
> > We can even update the banner if that's a thing, but I'm giving my +1 to
> > keep it gfsh.
> >
> > o o
> > /^^^^^7
> > ' ' ,oO))))))))Oo,
> > ,'))))))))))))))), /{
> > ' ,'o ))))))))))))))))={
> >> ))))))))))))))))={
> > `, ))))))\ \)))))))={
> > ',))))))))\/)))))' \{
> > '*O))))))))O*'
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > ~/William
>
>
Re: Can we close GEODE-36 ? (Gfsh renaming)
Posted by Mark Bretl <as...@gmail.com>.
+1, Geode Functional Shell
--Mark
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Jens Deppe <jd...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Gregory Chase <gc...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> > +1, but only if its "Geode Fab-SHell"
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Michael Stolz <ms...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > > Or Geode Fabric SHell
> > >
> > > We used to call it a Data Fabric at one time :)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mike Stolz
> > > Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager
> > > Mobile: 631-835-4771
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Anthony Baker <ab...@pivotal.io>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > I think Geode Fabulous SHell is a reasonable name. Changing it
> > generates
> > > > a ton of work both in the code and documentation without much benefit
> > > IMO.
> > > >
> > > > Link to the original discussion:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-geode-dev/201505.mbox/%3cCAF3UAT1FRANKyLUXeSG-m6yNXnTyw=3heo5350vF-80hvfZWYg@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > > >
> > > > Anthony
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Mar 15, 2016, at 9:41 PM, William Markito <wm...@pivotal.io>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Howdy!
> > > > >
> > > > > Looks like we had this discussion in the past but given my own
> > current
> > > > > understanding of the impacts and needs for such change, I'd like to
> > ask
> > > > if
> > > > > we can close GEODE-36 with the changes Nitin already did to display
> > the
> > > > > product name properly and keep it as is...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > We can even update the banner if that's a thing, but I'm giving my
> +1
> > > to
> > > > > keep it gfsh.
> > > > >
> > > > > o o
> > > > > /^^^^^7
> > > > > ' ' ,oO))))))))Oo,
> > > > > ,'))))))))))))))), /{
> > > > > ' ,'o ))))))))))))))))={
> > > > >> ))))))))))))))))={
> > > > > `, ))))))\ \)))))))={
> > > > > ',))))))))\/)))))' \{
> > > > > '*O))))))))O*'
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > ~/William
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Greg Chase
> >
> > Global Head, Big Data Communities
> > http://www.pivotal.io/big-data
> >
> > Pivotal Software
> > http://www.pivotal.io/
> >
> > 650-215-0477
> > @GregChase
> > Blog: http://geekmarketing.biz/
> >
>
Re: Can we close GEODE-36 ? (Gfsh renaming)
Posted by William Markito <wm...@pivotal.io>.
Thank you all folks! I'll put that to bed then...
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Kenneth Howe <kh...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> +1
>
> > On Mar 16, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Dan Smith <ds...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> >
> > +1 to gfsh, and +1 to William's ascii art!
> >
> > -Dan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Jens Deppe <jd...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Gregory Chase <gc...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1, but only if its "Geode Fab-SHell"
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Michael Stolz <ms...@pivotal.io>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1
> >>>> Or Geode Fabric SHell
> >>>>
> >>>> We used to call it a Data Fabric at one time :)
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Mike Stolz
> >>>> Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager
> >>>> Mobile: 631-835-4771
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Anthony Baker <ab...@pivotal.io>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I think Geode Fabulous SHell is a reasonable name. Changing it
> >>> generates
> >>>>> a ton of work both in the code and documentation without much benefit
> >>>> IMO.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Link to the original discussion:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-geode-dev/201505.mbox/%3cCAF3UAT1FRANKyLUXeSG-m6yNXnTyw=3heo5350vF-80hvfZWYg@mail.gmail.com%3e
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Anthony
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mar 15, 2016, at 9:41 PM, William Markito <wm...@pivotal.io>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Howdy!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Looks like we had this discussion in the past but given my own
> >>> current
> >>>>>> understanding of the impacts and needs for such change, I'd like to
> >>> ask
> >>>>> if
> >>>>>> we can close GEODE-36 with the changes Nitin already did to display
> >>> the
> >>>>>> product name properly and keep it as is...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We can even update the banner if that's a thing, but I'm giving my
> >> +1
> >>>> to
> >>>>>> keep it gfsh.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> o o
> >>>>>> /^^^^^7
> >>>>>> ' ' ,oO))))))))Oo,
> >>>>>> ,'))))))))))))))), /{
> >>>>>> ' ,'o ))))))))))))))))={
> >>>>>>> ))))))))))))))))={
> >>>>>> `, ))))))\ \)))))))={
> >>>>>> ',))))))))\/)))))' \{
> >>>>>> '*O))))))))O*'
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ~/William
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Greg Chase
> >>>
> >>> Global Head, Big Data Communities
> >>> http://www.pivotal.io/big-data
> >>>
> >>> Pivotal Software
> >>> http://www.pivotal.io/
> >>>
> >>> 650-215-0477
> >>> @GregChase
> >>> Blog: http://geekmarketing.biz/
> >>>
> >>
>
>
--
~/William
Re: Can we close GEODE-36 ? (Gfsh renaming)
Posted by Kenneth Howe <kh...@pivotal.io>.
+1
> On Mar 16, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Dan Smith <ds...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> +1 to gfsh, and +1 to William's ascii art!
>
> -Dan
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Jens Deppe <jd...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Gregory Chase <gc...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>>
>>> +1, but only if its "Geode Fab-SHell"
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Michael Stolz <ms...@pivotal.io>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>> Or Geode Fabric SHell
>>>>
>>>> We used to call it a Data Fabric at one time :)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Mike Stolz
>>>> Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager
>>>> Mobile: 631-835-4771
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Anthony Baker <ab...@pivotal.io>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> I think Geode Fabulous SHell is a reasonable name. Changing it
>>> generates
>>>>> a ton of work both in the code and documentation without much benefit
>>>> IMO.
>>>>>
>>>>> Link to the original discussion:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-geode-dev/201505.mbox/%3cCAF3UAT1FRANKyLUXeSG-m6yNXnTyw=3heo5350vF-80hvfZWYg@mail.gmail.com%3e
>>>>>
>>>>> Anthony
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mar 15, 2016, at 9:41 PM, William Markito <wm...@pivotal.io>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Howdy!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looks like we had this discussion in the past but given my own
>>> current
>>>>>> understanding of the impacts and needs for such change, I'd like to
>>> ask
>>>>> if
>>>>>> we can close GEODE-36 with the changes Nitin already did to display
>>> the
>>>>>> product name properly and keep it as is...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We can even update the banner if that's a thing, but I'm giving my
>> +1
>>>> to
>>>>>> keep it gfsh.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> o o
>>>>>> /^^^^^7
>>>>>> ' ' ,oO))))))))Oo,
>>>>>> ,'))))))))))))))), /{
>>>>>> ' ,'o ))))))))))))))))={
>>>>>>> ))))))))))))))))={
>>>>>> `, ))))))\ \)))))))={
>>>>>> ',))))))))\/)))))' \{
>>>>>> '*O))))))))O*'
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ~/William
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Greg Chase
>>>
>>> Global Head, Big Data Communities
>>> http://www.pivotal.io/big-data
>>>
>>> Pivotal Software
>>> http://www.pivotal.io/
>>>
>>> 650-215-0477
>>> @GregChase
>>> Blog: http://geekmarketing.biz/
>>>
>>
Re: Can we close GEODE-36 ? (Gfsh renaming)
Posted by Dan Smith <ds...@pivotal.io>.
+1 to gfsh, and +1 to William's ascii art!
-Dan
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Jens Deppe <jd...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Gregory Chase <gc...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> > +1, but only if its "Geode Fab-SHell"
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Michael Stolz <ms...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > > Or Geode Fabric SHell
> > >
> > > We used to call it a Data Fabric at one time :)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mike Stolz
> > > Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager
> > > Mobile: 631-835-4771
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Anthony Baker <ab...@pivotal.io>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > I think Geode Fabulous SHell is a reasonable name. Changing it
> > generates
> > > > a ton of work both in the code and documentation without much benefit
> > > IMO.
> > > >
> > > > Link to the original discussion:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-geode-dev/201505.mbox/%3cCAF3UAT1FRANKyLUXeSG-m6yNXnTyw=3heo5350vF-80hvfZWYg@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > > >
> > > > Anthony
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Mar 15, 2016, at 9:41 PM, William Markito <wm...@pivotal.io>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Howdy!
> > > > >
> > > > > Looks like we had this discussion in the past but given my own
> > current
> > > > > understanding of the impacts and needs for such change, I'd like to
> > ask
> > > > if
> > > > > we can close GEODE-36 with the changes Nitin already did to display
> > the
> > > > > product name properly and keep it as is...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > We can even update the banner if that's a thing, but I'm giving my
> +1
> > > to
> > > > > keep it gfsh.
> > > > >
> > > > > o o
> > > > > /^^^^^7
> > > > > ' ' ,oO))))))))Oo,
> > > > > ,'))))))))))))))), /{
> > > > > ' ,'o ))))))))))))))))={
> > > > >> ))))))))))))))))={
> > > > > `, ))))))\ \)))))))={
> > > > > ',))))))))\/)))))' \{
> > > > > '*O))))))))O*'
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > ~/William
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Greg Chase
> >
> > Global Head, Big Data Communities
> > http://www.pivotal.io/big-data
> >
> > Pivotal Software
> > http://www.pivotal.io/
> >
> > 650-215-0477
> > @GregChase
> > Blog: http://geekmarketing.biz/
> >
>
Re: Can we close GEODE-36 ? (Gfsh renaming)
Posted by Jens Deppe <jd...@pivotal.io>.
+1
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Gregory Chase <gc...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> +1, but only if its "Geode Fab-SHell"
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Michael Stolz <ms...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> > +1
> > Or Geode Fabric SHell
> >
> > We used to call it a Data Fabric at one time :)
> >
> > --
> > Mike Stolz
> > Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager
> > Mobile: 631-835-4771
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Anthony Baker <ab...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > I think Geode Fabulous SHell is a reasonable name. Changing it
> generates
> > > a ton of work both in the code and documentation without much benefit
> > IMO.
> > >
> > > Link to the original discussion:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-geode-dev/201505.mbox/%3cCAF3UAT1FRANKyLUXeSG-m6yNXnTyw=3heo5350vF-80hvfZWYg@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > >
> > > Anthony
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Mar 15, 2016, at 9:41 PM, William Markito <wm...@pivotal.io>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Howdy!
> > > >
> > > > Looks like we had this discussion in the past but given my own
> current
> > > > understanding of the impacts and needs for such change, I'd like to
> ask
> > > if
> > > > we can close GEODE-36 with the changes Nitin already did to display
> the
> > > > product name properly and keep it as is...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > We can even update the banner if that's a thing, but I'm giving my +1
> > to
> > > > keep it gfsh.
> > > >
> > > > o o
> > > > /^^^^^7
> > > > ' ' ,oO))))))))Oo,
> > > > ,'))))))))))))))), /{
> > > > ' ,'o ))))))))))))))))={
> > > >> ))))))))))))))))={
> > > > `, ))))))\ \)))))))={
> > > > ',))))))))\/)))))' \{
> > > > '*O))))))))O*'
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > ~/William
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Greg Chase
>
> Global Head, Big Data Communities
> http://www.pivotal.io/big-data
>
> Pivotal Software
> http://www.pivotal.io/
>
> 650-215-0477
> @GregChase
> Blog: http://geekmarketing.biz/
>
Re: Can we close GEODE-36 ? (Gfsh renaming)
Posted by Darrel Schneider <ds...@pivotal.io>.
+1
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Gregory Chase <gc...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> +1, but only if its "Geode Fab-SHell"
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Michael Stolz <ms...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> > +1
> > Or Geode Fabric SHell
> >
> > We used to call it a Data Fabric at one time :)
> >
> > --
> > Mike Stolz
> > Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager
> > Mobile: 631-835-4771
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Anthony Baker <ab...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > I think Geode Fabulous SHell is a reasonable name. Changing it
> generates
> > > a ton of work both in the code and documentation without much benefit
> > IMO.
> > >
> > > Link to the original discussion:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-geode-dev/201505.mbox/%3cCAF3UAT1FRANKyLUXeSG-m6yNXnTyw=3heo5350vF-80hvfZWYg@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > >
> > > Anthony
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Mar 15, 2016, at 9:41 PM, William Markito <wm...@pivotal.io>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Howdy!
> > > >
> > > > Looks like we had this discussion in the past but given my own
> current
> > > > understanding of the impacts and needs for such change, I'd like to
> ask
> > > if
> > > > we can close GEODE-36 with the changes Nitin already did to display
> the
> > > > product name properly and keep it as is...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > We can even update the banner if that's a thing, but I'm giving my +1
> > to
> > > > keep it gfsh.
> > > >
> > > > o o
> > > > /^^^^^7
> > > > ' ' ,oO))))))))Oo,
> > > > ,'))))))))))))))), /{
> > > > ' ,'o ))))))))))))))))={
> > > >> ))))))))))))))))={
> > > > `, ))))))\ \)))))))={
> > > > ',))))))))\/)))))' \{
> > > > '*O))))))))O*'
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > ~/William
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Greg Chase
>
> Global Head, Big Data Communities
> http://www.pivotal.io/big-data
>
> Pivotal Software
> http://www.pivotal.io/
>
> 650-215-0477
> @GregChase
> Blog: http://geekmarketing.biz/
>
Re: Can we close GEODE-36 ? (Gfsh renaming)
Posted by Gregory Chase <gc...@pivotal.io>.
+1, but only if its "Geode Fab-SHell"
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Michael Stolz <ms...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> +1
> Or Geode Fabric SHell
>
> We used to call it a Data Fabric at one time :)
>
> --
> Mike Stolz
> Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager
> Mobile: 631-835-4771
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Anthony Baker <ab...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > I think Geode Fabulous SHell is a reasonable name. Changing it generates
> > a ton of work both in the code and documentation without much benefit
> IMO.
> >
> > Link to the original discussion:
> >
> >
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-geode-dev/201505.mbox/%3cCAF3UAT1FRANKyLUXeSG-m6yNXnTyw=3heo5350vF-80hvfZWYg@mail.gmail.com%3e
> >
> > Anthony
> >
> >
> > > On Mar 15, 2016, at 9:41 PM, William Markito <wm...@pivotal.io>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Howdy!
> > >
> > > Looks like we had this discussion in the past but given my own current
> > > understanding of the impacts and needs for such change, I'd like to ask
> > if
> > > we can close GEODE-36 with the changes Nitin already did to display the
> > > product name properly and keep it as is...
> > >
> > >
> > > We can even update the banner if that's a thing, but I'm giving my +1
> to
> > > keep it gfsh.
> > >
> > > o o
> > > /^^^^^7
> > > ' ' ,oO))))))))Oo,
> > > ,'))))))))))))))), /{
> > > ' ,'o ))))))))))))))))={
> > >> ))))))))))))))))={
> > > `, ))))))\ \)))))))={
> > > ',))))))))\/)))))' \{
> > > '*O))))))))O*'
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > ~/William
> >
> >
>
--
Greg Chase
Global Head, Big Data Communities
http://www.pivotal.io/big-data
Pivotal Software
http://www.pivotal.io/
650-215-0477
@GregChase
Blog: http://geekmarketing.biz/
Re: Can we close GEODE-36 ? (Gfsh renaming)
Posted by Michael Stolz <ms...@pivotal.io>.
+1
Or Geode Fabric SHell
We used to call it a Data Fabric at one time :)
--
Mike Stolz
Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager
Mobile: 631-835-4771
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Anthony Baker <ab...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> +1
>
> I think Geode Fabulous SHell is a reasonable name. Changing it generates
> a ton of work both in the code and documentation without much benefit IMO.
>
> Link to the original discussion:
>
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-geode-dev/201505.mbox/%3cCAF3UAT1FRANKyLUXeSG-m6yNXnTyw=3heo5350vF-80hvfZWYg@mail.gmail.com%3e
>
> Anthony
>
>
> > On Mar 15, 2016, at 9:41 PM, William Markito <wm...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> >
> > Howdy!
> >
> > Looks like we had this discussion in the past but given my own current
> > understanding of the impacts and needs for such change, I'd like to ask
> if
> > we can close GEODE-36 with the changes Nitin already did to display the
> > product name properly and keep it as is...
> >
> >
> > We can even update the banner if that's a thing, but I'm giving my +1 to
> > keep it gfsh.
> >
> > o o
> > /^^^^^7
> > ' ' ,oO))))))))Oo,
> > ,'))))))))))))))), /{
> > ' ,'o ))))))))))))))))={
> >> ))))))))))))))))={
> > `, ))))))\ \)))))))={
> > ',))))))))\/)))))' \{
> > '*O))))))))O*'
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > ~/William
>
>
Re: Can we close GEODE-36 ? (Gfsh renaming)
Posted by John Blum <jb...@pivotal.io>.
+1
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Anthony Baker <ab...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> +1
>
> I think Geode Fabulous SHell is a reasonable name. Changing it generates
> a ton of work both in the code and documentation without much benefit IMO.
>
> Link to the original discussion:
>
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-geode-dev/201505.mbox/%3cCAF3UAT1FRANKyLUXeSG-m6yNXnTyw=3heo5350vF-80hvfZWYg@mail.gmail.com%3e
>
> Anthony
>
>
> > On Mar 15, 2016, at 9:41 PM, William Markito <wm...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> >
> > Howdy!
> >
> > Looks like we had this discussion in the past but given my own current
> > understanding of the impacts and needs for such change, I'd like to ask
> if
> > we can close GEODE-36 with the changes Nitin already did to display the
> > product name properly and keep it as is...
> >
> >
> > We can even update the banner if that's a thing, but I'm giving my +1 to
> > keep it gfsh.
> >
> > o o
> > /^^^^^7
> > ' ' ,oO))))))))Oo,
> > ,'))))))))))))))), /{
> > ' ,'o ))))))))))))))))={
> >> ))))))))))))))))={
> > `, ))))))\ \)))))))={
> > ',))))))))\/)))))' \{
> > '*O))))))))O*'
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > ~/William
>
>
--
-John
503-504-8657
john.blum10101 (skype)
Re: Can we close GEODE-36 ? (Gfsh renaming)
Posted by Anthony Baker <ab...@pivotal.io>.
+1
I think Geode Fabulous SHell is a reasonable name. Changing it generates a ton of work both in the code and documentation without much benefit IMO.
Link to the original discussion:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-geode-dev/201505.mbox/%3cCAF3UAT1FRANKyLUXeSG-m6yNXnTyw=3heo5350vF-80hvfZWYg@mail.gmail.com%3e
Anthony
> On Mar 15, 2016, at 9:41 PM, William Markito <wm...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> Howdy!
>
> Looks like we had this discussion in the past but given my own current
> understanding of the impacts and needs for such change, I'd like to ask if
> we can close GEODE-36 with the changes Nitin already did to display the
> product name properly and keep it as is...
>
>
> We can even update the banner if that's a thing, but I'm giving my +1 to
> keep it gfsh.
>
> o o
> /^^^^^7
> ' ' ,oO))))))))Oo,
> ,'))))))))))))))), /{
> ' ,'o ))))))))))))))))={
>> ))))))))))))))))={
> `, ))))))\ \)))))))={
> ',))))))))\/)))))' \{
> '*O))))))))O*'
>
>
> --
>
> ~/William