You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pig.apache.org by Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com> on 2009/03/07 02:28:36 UTC
Next pig release
Pig Developers and Committers,
Now that types branch is merged into trunk and the dust settled, I
propose that it is time for the next release.
I propose that we name this release as Pig 1.0.0 since this is a major
rework and a much more stable and performant code with stable
interfaces.
Olga
RE: Next pig release
Posted by Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com>.
Yes, I believe that we plan to keep our interfaces stable for some time.
Olga
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nigel Daley [mailto:ndaley@yahoo-inc.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 5:57 PM
> To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Next pig release
>
> If we're committing to backward compatibility for a while,
> then I'd +1 1.0.0. I think Pig is stable enough.
>
> Nige
>
> On Mar 9, 2009, at 1:02 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
>
> > +1 on doing a release. +0 on calling it 1.0. Are we really that
> > stable?
> >
> > Alan.
> >
> > On Mar 6, 2009, at 5:28 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote:
> >
> >> Pig Developers and Committers,
> >>
> >> Now that types branch is merged into trunk and the dust settled, I
> >> propose that it is time for the next release.
> >>
> >> I propose that we name this release as Pig 1.0.0 since this is a
> >> major
> >> rework and a much more stable and performant code with stable
> >> interfaces.
> >>
> >> Olga
> >
>
>
Re: Next pig release
Posted by Nigel Daley <nd...@yahoo-inc.com>.
If we're committing to backward compatibility for a while, then I'd +1
1.0.0. I think Pig is stable enough.
Nige
On Mar 9, 2009, at 1:02 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
> +1 on doing a release. +0 on calling it 1.0. Are we really that
> stable?
>
> Alan.
>
> On Mar 6, 2009, at 5:28 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote:
>
>> Pig Developers and Committers,
>>
>> Now that types branch is merged into trunk and the dust settled, I
>> propose that it is time for the next release.
>>
>> I propose that we name this release as Pig 1.0.0 since this is a
>> major
>> rework and a much more stable and performant code with stable
>> interfaces.
>>
>> Olga
>
Re: Next pig release
Posted by Alan Gates <ga...@yahoo-inc.com>.
+1 on doing a release. +0 on calling it 1.0. Are we really that
stable?
Alan.
On Mar 6, 2009, at 5:28 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote:
> Pig Developers and Committers,
>
> Now that types branch is merged into trunk and the dust settled, I
> propose that it is time for the next release.
>
> I propose that we name this release as Pig 1.0.0 since this is a major
> rework and a much more stable and performant code with stable
> interfaces.
>
> Olga