You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@xalan.apache.org by Sc...@lotus.com on 2001/06/18 06:26:37 UTC
I think extensions are OK now
Gary, as far as I know the extensions should be OK now. There are a few
places where I need to go back and clean up some conversion stuff, but I'm
going to leave it for the moment. If you can, it would be a great help if
you gave it a run to see if everything seems OK for you.
I did have trouble with a test where an extension took a Long, and the
XNumber object could not be converted to a Long. As far as I can tell,
this was not due to any change with the branch merge. Is this correct?
-scott
Gary L Peskin
<garyp@firste To: xalan-dev@xml.apache.org
ch.com> cc: (bcc: Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus)
Subject: Re: Retrofit of changes since DTM work
06/14/2001
12:45 PM
Please
respond to
xalan-dev
Although I'm not familiar with the DTM stuff yet, if I can help, please
let me know. Test cases that are failing would be particularly helpful.
Gary
Scott_Boag@lotus.com wrote:
>
> Later in the day today will be fine.
>
> If you haven't already discovered, there are some nasty regressions to
> extensions. The nodeset stuff in particular is a problem. I'll be
working
> on these over the next couple of days.
>
> -scott
>
>
> Gary L Peskin
> <garyp@firste To: Xalan Development
<xa...@xml.apache.org>
> ch.com> cc: (bcc: Scott
Boag/CAM/Lotus)
> Subject: Retrofit of changes
since DTM work
> 06/14/2001
> 11:33 AM
> Please
> respond to
> xalan-dev
>
>
>
> I am down to three sets of changes that I've made to Xalan that have not
> yet been retrofitted into the code since the DTM merge into the main
> branch.
>
> I'm planning on making those changes today. Hopefully, this will be in
> time for the 2.2D2 build. If you're planning on doing the build before
> tomorrow, please let me know and I will try to get this done as soon as
> I can today. Otherwise, I plan on doing it later in the day.
>
> Gary
Re: I think extensions are OK now
Posted by Gary L Peskin <ga...@firstech.com>.
Scott_Boag@lotus.com wrote:
>
> Gary, as far as I know the extensions should be OK now. There are a few
> places where I need to go back and clean up some conversion stuff, but I'm
> going to leave it for the moment. If you can, it would be a great help if
> you gave it a run to see if everything seems OK for you.
Great work! I'll have a look. This is very exciting.
>
> I did have trouble with a test where an extension took a Long, and the
> XNumber object could not be converted to a Long. As far as I can tell,
> this was not due to any change with the branch merge. Is this correct?
Can you let me know the name of the test or send the XML and XSLT?
Gary