You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to qa@openoffice.apache.org by Daniel Alvaro <jd...@gmail.com> on 2013/03/01 21:36:29 UTC

QA REPORT

Hello, I was cheking the bug 116586:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=116586, The persone say is
necesarie
 to move the l10n module into own repository because l10n process produce
giant commits and blow up the main repository.

My question is, how can I reproduce this bug? Or it's an enhacement?

Thank you

Regards.

Re: QA REPORT

Posted by Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org>.

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Daniel Alvaro <jd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello, I was cheking the bug 116586:
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=116586, The persone say is
> necesarie
>  to move the l10n module into own repository because l10n process produce
> giant commits and blow up the main repository.
>
> My question is, how can I reproduce this bug? Or it's an enhacement?
>

The original author should have classified this one as a "TASK".
Sometimes the developers use BZ to track items related to their work,
not just bugs.

I closed this issue for you.

-Rob

> Thank you
>
> Regards.

Re: QA REPORT

Posted by "lgmattana@alice.it" <lg...@alice.it>.

unsubscribe, please.
Best regards.
Luigi G. Mattana

Il 2013-03-01 21:36, Daniel Alvaro ha scritto:
> Hello, I was cheking the bug 116586:
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=116586, The persone say is
> necesarie
>   to move the l10n module into own repository because l10n process produce
> giant commits and blow up the main repository.
>
> My question is, how can I reproduce this bug? Or it's an enhacement?
>
> Thank you
>
> Regards.
>