You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net> on 2011/07/01 13:36:45 UTC
Re: [ApacheDS] Build issue and Java 5 compatibility (Fwd: Build failed in Jenkins: dir-apacheds-jdk15-ubuntu-deploy #310)
How about launching a more formal vote about this ?
I think such an important change deserves a real 72 hours vote.
Kiran suggested me on IM that we also take some feedback from users via a notice mail on the users ML.
I think it's a very good idea and we should do that prior to the vote.
Lastly, we've seen that moving ApacheDS to Java 6 only implicates that Studio should do the same.
What about the LDAP API ?
There's no technical reason to move it to Java 6 only, except the fact that we want to unify all our sub-projects.
WDYT?
Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud
On 30 juin 2011, at 15:23, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> SNIP ...
>
>>> I see too possible workarounds:
>>> - we switch back to a version of ActiveMQ still compiled using Java 5
>>> - we move our compilation for ApacheDS from Java 5 to Java 6
>>> (This also implicitly indicates that we will do the same for Studio as
>>> it depends on the latest version of ApacheDS)
>>>
>>> What are your thoughts about this?
>>
>> Let's get rid of Java 5.
>
> +1
>
> Regards,
> Alex
Re: [ApacheDS] Build issue and Java 5 compatibility (Fwd: Build failed
in Jenkins: dir-apacheds-jdk15-ubuntu-deploy #310)
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
On 7/1/11 1:36 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
> How about launching a more formal vote about this ?
> I think such an important change deserves a real 72 hours vote.
>
> Kiran suggested me on IM that we also take some feedback from users via a notice mail on the users ML.
> I think it's a very good idea and we should do that prior to the vote.
>
> Lastly, we've seen that moving ApacheDS to Java 6 only implicates that Studio should do the same.
> What about the LDAP API ?
> There's no technical reason to move it to Java 6 only, except the fact that we want to unify all our sub-projects.
>
> WDYT?
Vote, vote vote. (à la Steve Ballmer)
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com