You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to batik-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Luis Bernardo <lm...@gmail.com> on 2014/07/02 01:42:21 UTC
svgcolor12 branch
Hi Jeremias,
I recently discovered the batik svgcolor12 branch that you created and
worked on. I tested support for CMYK color (with a simple example) and
it worked well, so I am keen to see this merged to trunk. What is the
status of the branch (and implementation)?
Thanks,
Luis
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Merge Batik svg12color branch to trunk
Posted by Chris Bowditch <bo...@hotmail.com>.
Hi Luis,
I took your suggestion of checking out the branch and running some
tests. The test samples/tests/spec/color/colorProfile.svg, contains
some RGB colours that use a colour profile, and I can confirm that the
branch doesn't regress this particular test case.
Therefore, I vote +1 to merge this branch and add support for CMYK colour
Thanks,
Chris
On 04/08/2014 22:44, Luis Bernardo wrote:
>
> I would like to merge the Batik svg12color branch to trunk. This work
> was done by Jeremias.
>
> I am interested in using this new functionality with FOP (see attached
> example) and from my testing the code works well, and Jeremias also
> thinks the code is ready.
>
> Note that this branch introduces a dependency in xmlgraphics-commons
> (which in my opinion is a good thing because for the first time
> commons will be common to FOP and Batik!).
>
> I will wait one week before I merge the code so please voice any
> opinion before that if you care. You are also free, and encouraged, to
> test the code and vote!
>
> +1
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: svgcolor12 branch
> Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 15:57:10 +0100
> From: Luis Bernardo <lm...@gmail.com>
> To: batik-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>
>
> Hi Jeremias,
>
> I tried the merge to trunk and except for the log changes file there
> were no conflicts. I assume you don't mind if I proceed with the merge
> by launching a vote next week (unless you want to do it yourself).
>
> Attached is an FOP file (and the resulting PDF generated using the new
> Batik jar) with an SVG with CMYK.
>
> Luis
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Jeremias Maerki
> <dev@jeremias-maerki.ch <ma...@jeremias-maerki.ch>> wrote:
>
> Hi Luis
>
> I'm terribly sorry for the late answer. I've just downloaded the
> e-mails
> from this account which I haven't done for more than a month.
>
> Basically, I think it's fine to merge that back into trunk. I'm still
> maintaining private branches of FOP and Batik which add OSGi
> support and
> the Batik one is based on the color branch. I've never gotten
> around to
> make the push back into official repositories especially since
> those API
> changes in FOP that I didn't agree with. I've made some additional
> changes to my Batik branch which is mostly just cosmetics but I've
> also
> merged most of the changes from the foreignObject branch in there
> because I needed to embed XHTML in SVG. And I've made little
> changes to
> URI/URL resolution. So looking at my change log, I think I didn't have
> to do any changes to the color support since I've last worked on that
> (official) branch.
>
> HTH,
> Jeremias Maerki
>
>
> On 02.07.2014 01:42:21 Luis Bernardo wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jeremias,
> >
> > I recently discovered the batik svgcolor12 branch that you
> created and
> > worked on. I tested support for CMYK color (with a simple
> example) and
> > it worked well, so I am keen to see this merged to trunk. What
> is the
> > status of the branch (and implementation)?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Luis
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> batik-dev-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> <ma...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> batik-dev-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> <ma...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Merge Batik svg12color branch to trunk
Posted by Clay Leeds <th...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me!
Cheers!
Clay
--
"My religion is simple. My religion is kindness."
- HH The Dalai Lama of Tibet
> On Aug 5, 2014, at 12:41 AM, Pascal Sancho <ps...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> +1
> the new dependency on XGC is welcome and makes a lot of sense.
>
>
> 2014-08-04 23:44 GMT+02:00 Luis Bernardo <lm...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> I would like to merge the Batik svg12color branch to trunk. This work was done by Jeremias.
>>
>> I am interested in using this new functionality with FOP (see attached example) and from my testing the code works well, and Jeremias also thinks the code is ready.
>>
>> Note that this branch introduces a dependency in xmlgraphics-commons (which in my opinion is a good thing because for the first time commons will be common to FOP and Batik!).
>>
>> I will wait one week before I merge the code so please voice any opinion before that if you care. You are also free, and encouraged, to test the code and vote!
>>
>> +1
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: svgcolor12 branch
>> Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 15:57:10 +0100
>> From: Luis Bernardo <lm...@gmail.com>
>> To: batik-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>
>> Hi Jeremias,
>>
>> I tried the merge to trunk and except for the log changes file there were no conflicts. I assume you don't mind if I proceed with the merge by launching a vote next week (unless you want to do it yourself).
>>
>> Attached is an FOP file (and the resulting PDF generated using the new Batik jar) with an SVG with CMYK.
>>
>> Luis
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Jeremias Maerki <de...@jeremias-maerki.ch> wrote:
>>> Hi Luis
>>>
>>> I'm terribly sorry for the late answer. I've just downloaded the e-mails
>>> from this account which I haven't done for more than a month.
>>>
>>> Basically, I think it's fine to merge that back into trunk. I'm still
>>> maintaining private branches of FOP and Batik which add OSGi support and
>>> the Batik one is based on the color branch. I've never gotten around to
>>> make the push back into official repositories especially since those API
>>> changes in FOP that I didn't agree with. I've made some additional
>>> changes to my Batik branch which is mostly just cosmetics but I've also
>>> merged most of the changes from the foreignObject branch in there
>>> because I needed to embed XHTML in SVG. And I've made little changes to
>>> URI/URL resolution. So looking at my change log, I think I didn't have
>>> to do any changes to the color support since I've last worked on that
>>> (official) branch.
>>>
>>> HTH,
>>> Jeremias Maerki
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02.07.2014 01:42:21 Luis Bernardo wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi Jeremias,
>>> >
>>> > I recently discovered the batik svgcolor12 branch that you created and
>>> > worked on. I tested support for CMYK color (with a simple example) and
>>> > it worked well, so I am keen to see this merged to trunk. What is the
>>> > status of the branch (and implementation)?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Luis
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>
>
> --
> pascal
Re: [VOTE] Merge Batik svg12color branch to trunk
Posted by Pascal Sancho <ps...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
+1
the new dependency on XGC is welcome and makes a lot of sense.
2014-08-04 23:44 GMT+02:00 Luis Bernardo <lm...@gmail.com>:
>
> I would like to merge the Batik svg12color branch to trunk. This work was
> done by Jeremias.
>
> I am interested in using this new functionality with FOP (see attached
> example) and from my testing the code works well, and Jeremias also thinks
> the code is ready.
>
> Note that this branch introduces a dependency in xmlgraphics-commons
> (which in my opinion is a good thing because for the first time commons
> will be common to FOP and Batik!).
>
> I will wait one week before I merge the code so please voice any opinion
> before that if you care. You are also free, and encouraged, to test the
> code and vote!
>
> +1
>
> -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: svgcolor12 branch Date: Fri,
> 1 Aug 2014 15:57:10 +0100 From: Luis Bernardo <lm...@gmail.com>
> <lm...@gmail.com> To: batik-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
> Hi Jeremias,
>
> I tried the merge to trunk and except for the log changes file there
> were no conflicts. I assume you don't mind if I proceed with the merge by
> launching a vote next week (unless you want to do it yourself).
>
> Attached is an FOP file (and the resulting PDF generated using the new
> Batik jar) with an SVG with CMYK.
>
> Luis
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Jeremias Maerki <de...@jeremias-maerki.ch>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Luis
>>
>> I'm terribly sorry for the late answer. I've just downloaded the e-mails
>> from this account which I haven't done for more than a month.
>>
>> Basically, I think it's fine to merge that back into trunk. I'm still
>> maintaining private branches of FOP and Batik which add OSGi support and
>> the Batik one is based on the color branch. I've never gotten around to
>> make the push back into official repositories especially since those API
>> changes in FOP that I didn't agree with. I've made some additional
>> changes to my Batik branch which is mostly just cosmetics but I've also
>> merged most of the changes from the foreignObject branch in there
>> because I needed to embed XHTML in SVG. And I've made little changes to
>> URI/URL resolution. So looking at my change log, I think I didn't have
>> to do any changes to the color support since I've last worked on that
>> (official) branch.
>>
>> HTH,
>> Jeremias Maerki
>>
>>
>> On 02.07.2014 01:42:21 Luis Bernardo wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Jeremias,
>> >
>> > I recently discovered the batik svgcolor12 branch that you created and
>> > worked on. I tested support for CMYK color (with a simple example) and
>> > it worked well, so I am keen to see this merged to trunk. What is the
>> > status of the branch (and implementation)?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Luis
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
--
pascal
Re: [VOTE] Merge Batik svg12color branch to trunk
Posted by Luis Bernardo <lm...@gmail.com>.
I have now merged this branch. Thanks to everyone that voted.
On 8/4/14, 10:44 PM, Luis Bernardo wrote:
>
> I would like to merge the Batik svg12color branch to trunk. This work
> was done by Jeremias.
>
> I am interested in using this new functionality with FOP (see attached
> example) and from my testing the code works well, and Jeremias also
> thinks the code is ready.
>
> Note that this branch introduces a dependency in xmlgraphics-commons
> (which in my opinion is a good thing because for the first time
> commons will be common to FOP and Batik!).
>
> I will wait one week before I merge the code so please voice any
> opinion before that if you care. You are also free, and encouraged, to
> test the code and vote!
>
> +1
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: svgcolor12 branch
> Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 15:57:10 +0100
> From: Luis Bernardo <lm...@gmail.com>
> To: batik-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>
>
> Hi Jeremias,
>
> I tried the merge to trunk and except for the log changes file there
> were no conflicts. I assume you don't mind if I proceed with the merge
> by launching a vote next week (unless you want to do it yourself).
>
> Attached is an FOP file (and the resulting PDF generated using the new
> Batik jar) with an SVG with CMYK.
>
> Luis
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Jeremias Maerki
> <dev@jeremias-maerki.ch <ma...@jeremias-maerki.ch>> wrote:
>
> Hi Luis
>
> I'm terribly sorry for the late answer. I've just downloaded the
> e-mails
> from this account which I haven't done for more than a month.
>
> Basically, I think it's fine to merge that back into trunk. I'm still
> maintaining private branches of FOP and Batik which add OSGi
> support and
> the Batik one is based on the color branch. I've never gotten
> around to
> make the push back into official repositories especially since
> those API
> changes in FOP that I didn't agree with. I've made some additional
> changes to my Batik branch which is mostly just cosmetics but I've
> also
> merged most of the changes from the foreignObject branch in there
> because I needed to embed XHTML in SVG. And I've made little
> changes to
> URI/URL resolution. So looking at my change log, I think I didn't have
> to do any changes to the color support since I've last worked on that
> (official) branch.
>
> HTH,
> Jeremias Maerki
>
>
> On 02.07.2014 01:42:21 Luis Bernardo wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jeremias,
> >
> > I recently discovered the batik svgcolor12 branch that you
> created and
> > worked on. I tested support for CMYK color (with a simple
> example) and
> > it worked well, so I am keen to see this merged to trunk. What
> is the
> > status of the branch (and implementation)?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Luis
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> batik-dev-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> <ma...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> batik-dev-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> <ma...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Merge Batik svg12color branch to trunk
Posted by Vincent Hennebert <vh...@gmail.com>.
+1
Vincent
On 04/08/14 23:44, Luis Bernardo wrote:
>
> I would like to merge the Batik svg12color branch to trunk. This work was done
> by Jeremias.
>
> I am interested in using this new functionality with FOP (see attached
> example) and from my testing the code works well, and Jeremias also thinks the
> code is ready.
>
> Note that this branch introduces a dependency in xmlgraphics-commons (which in
> my opinion is a good thing because for the first time commons will be common
> to FOP and Batik!).
>
> I will wait one week before I merge the code so please voice any opinion
> before that if you care. You are also free, and encouraged, to test the code
> and vote!
>
> +1
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: svgcolor12 branch
> Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 15:57:10 +0100
> From: Luis Bernardo <lm...@gmail.com>
> To: batik-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>
>
> Hi Jeremias,
>
> I tried the merge to trunk and except for the log changes file there were no
> conflicts. I assume you don't mind if I proceed with the merge by launching a
> vote next week (unless you want to do it yourself).
>
> Attached is an FOP file (and the resulting PDF generated using the new Batik
> jar) with an SVG with CMYK.
>
> Luis
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Jeremias Maerki <dev@jeremias-maerki.ch
> <ma...@jeremias-maerki.ch>> wrote:
>
> Hi Luis
>
> I'm terribly sorry for the late answer. I've just downloaded the e-mails
> from this account which I haven't done for more than a month.
>
> Basically, I think it's fine to merge that back into trunk. I'm still
> maintaining private branches of FOP and Batik which add OSGi support and
> the Batik one is based on the color branch. I've never gotten around to
> make the push back into official repositories especially since those API
> changes in FOP that I didn't agree with. I've made some additional
> changes to my Batik branch which is mostly just cosmetics but I've also
> merged most of the changes from the foreignObject branch in there
> because I needed to embed XHTML in SVG. And I've made little changes to
> URI/URL resolution. So looking at my change log, I think I didn't have
> to do any changes to the color support since I've last worked on that
> (official) branch.
>
> HTH,
> Jeremias Maerki
>
>
> On 02.07.2014 01:42:21 Luis Bernardo wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jeremias,
> >
> > I recently discovered the batik svgcolor12 branch that you created and
> > worked on. I tested support for CMYK color (with a simple example) and
> > it worked well, so I am keen to see this merged to trunk. What is the
> > status of the branch (and implementation)?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Luis
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> <ma...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> <ma...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
[VOTE] Merge Batik svg12color branch to trunk
Posted by Luis Bernardo <lm...@gmail.com>.
I would like to merge the Batik svg12color branch to trunk. This work
was done by Jeremias.
I am interested in using this new functionality with FOP (see attached
example) and from my testing the code works well, and Jeremias also
thinks the code is ready.
Note that this branch introduces a dependency in xmlgraphics-commons
(which in my opinion is a good thing because for the first time commons
will be common to FOP and Batik!).
I will wait one week before I merge the code so please voice any opinion
before that if you care. You are also free, and encouraged, to test the
code and vote!
+1
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: svgcolor12 branch
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 15:57:10 +0100
From: Luis Bernardo <lm...@gmail.com>
To: batik-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Hi Jeremias,
I tried the merge to trunk and except for the log changes file there
were no conflicts. I assume you don't mind if I proceed with the merge
by launching a vote next week (unless you want to do it yourself).
Attached is an FOP file (and the resulting PDF generated using the new
Batik jar) with an SVG with CMYK.
Luis
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Jeremias Maerki <dev@jeremias-maerki.ch
<ma...@jeremias-maerki.ch>> wrote:
Hi Luis
I'm terribly sorry for the late answer. I've just downloaded the e-mails
from this account which I haven't done for more than a month.
Basically, I think it's fine to merge that back into trunk. I'm still
maintaining private branches of FOP and Batik which add OSGi support and
the Batik one is based on the color branch. I've never gotten around to
make the push back into official repositories especially since those API
changes in FOP that I didn't agree with. I've made some additional
changes to my Batik branch which is mostly just cosmetics but I've also
merged most of the changes from the foreignObject branch in there
because I needed to embed XHTML in SVG. And I've made little changes to
URI/URL resolution. So looking at my change log, I think I didn't have
to do any changes to the color support since I've last worked on that
(official) branch.
HTH,
Jeremias Maerki
On 02.07.2014 01:42:21 Luis Bernardo wrote:
>
> Hi Jeremias,
>
> I recently discovered the batik svgcolor12 branch that you
created and
> worked on. I tested support for CMYK color (with a simple
example) and
> it worked well, so I am keen to see this merged to trunk. What is the
> status of the branch (and implementation)?
>
> Thanks,
> Luis
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
<ma...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail:
batik-dev-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
<ma...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
Re: svgcolor12 branch
Posted by Luis Bernardo <lm...@gmail.com>.
Hi Jeremias,
I tried the merge to trunk and except for the log changes file there were
no conflicts. I assume you don't mind if I proceed with the merge by
launching a vote next week (unless you want to do it yourself).
Attached is an FOP file (and the resulting PDF generated using the new
Batik jar) with an SVG with CMYK.
Luis
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Jeremias Maerki <de...@jeremias-maerki.ch>
wrote:
> Hi Luis
>
> I'm terribly sorry for the late answer. I've just downloaded the e-mails
> from this account which I haven't done for more than a month.
>
> Basically, I think it's fine to merge that back into trunk. I'm still
> maintaining private branches of FOP and Batik which add OSGi support and
> the Batik one is based on the color branch. I've never gotten around to
> make the push back into official repositories especially since those API
> changes in FOP that I didn't agree with. I've made some additional
> changes to my Batik branch which is mostly just cosmetics but I've also
> merged most of the changes from the foreignObject branch in there
> because I needed to embed XHTML in SVG. And I've made little changes to
> URI/URL resolution. So looking at my change log, I think I didn't have
> to do any changes to the color support since I've last worked on that
> (official) branch.
>
> HTH,
> Jeremias Maerki
>
>
> On 02.07.2014 01:42:21 Luis Bernardo wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jeremias,
> >
> > I recently discovered the batik svgcolor12 branch that you created and
> > worked on. I tested support for CMYK color (with a simple example) and
> > it worked well, so I am keen to see this merged to trunk. What is the
> > status of the branch (and implementation)?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Luis
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>
Re: svgcolor12 branch
Posted by Chris Bowditch <bo...@hotmail.com>.
Thanks Jeremias. Since we are planning a release of Batik, we should
merge this branch before we do the release, so that CMYK support is
included in the 1.8 release.
Thanks,
Chris
On 29/07/2014 08:16, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Hi Luis
>
> I'm terribly sorry for the late answer. I've just downloaded the e-mails
> from this account which I haven't done for more than a month.
>
> Basically, I think it's fine to merge that back into trunk. I'm still
> maintaining private branches of FOP and Batik which add OSGi support and
> the Batik one is based on the color branch. I've never gotten around to
> make the push back into official repositories especially since those API
> changes in FOP that I didn't agree with. I've made some additional
> changes to my Batik branch which is mostly just cosmetics but I've also
> merged most of the changes from the foreignObject branch in there
> because I needed to embed XHTML in SVG. And I've made little changes to
> URI/URL resolution. So looking at my change log, I think I didn't have
> to do any changes to the color support since I've last worked on that
> (official) branch.
>
> HTH,
> Jeremias Maerki
>
>
> On 02.07.2014 01:42:21 Luis Bernardo wrote:
>> Hi Jeremias,
>>
>> I recently discovered the batik svgcolor12 branch that you created and
>> worked on. I tested support for CMYK color (with a simple example) and
>> it worked well, so I am keen to see this merged to trunk. What is the
>> status of the branch (and implementation)?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Luis
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: svgcolor12 branch
Posted by Jeremias Maerki <de...@jeremias-maerki.ch>.
Hi Luis
I'm terribly sorry for the late answer. I've just downloaded the e-mails
from this account which I haven't done for more than a month.
Basically, I think it's fine to merge that back into trunk. I'm still
maintaining private branches of FOP and Batik which add OSGi support and
the Batik one is based on the color branch. I've never gotten around to
make the push back into official repositories especially since those API
changes in FOP that I didn't agree with. I've made some additional
changes to my Batik branch which is mostly just cosmetics but I've also
merged most of the changes from the foreignObject branch in there
because I needed to embed XHTML in SVG. And I've made little changes to
URI/URL resolution. So looking at my change log, I think I didn't have
to do any changes to the color support since I've last worked on that
(official) branch.
HTH,
Jeremias Maerki
On 02.07.2014 01:42:21 Luis Bernardo wrote:
>
> Hi Jeremias,
>
> I recently discovered the batik svgcolor12 branch that you created and
> worked on. I tested support for CMYK color (with a simple example) and
> it worked well, so I am keen to see this merged to trunk. What is the
> status of the branch (and implementation)?
>
> Thanks,
> Luis
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org