You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Fabian Hueske (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/06/27 17:29:00 UTC

[jira] [Closed] (FLINK-9524) NPE from ProcTimeBoundedRangeOver.scala

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Fabian Hueske closed FLINK-9524.
--------------------------------
       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 1.5.1
                   1.4.3
                   1.6.0

Fixed in 1.6.0 with eb525b7f889600fa4f4dbbdbee161848e5d570dd
Fixed in 1.5.1 with d8ad69fc88eea46648a9fcd686df613bb245e7db
Fixed in 1.4.3 with 3ff508f7ed15b2b890249efba346c0fa1bdf9b74

> NPE from ProcTimeBoundedRangeOver.scala
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-9524
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9524
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Table API &amp; SQL
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0
>            Reporter: yan zhou
>            Assignee: yan zhou
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.6.0, 1.4.3, 1.5.1
>
>         Attachments: npe_from_ProcTimeBoundedRangeOver.txt
>
>
> The class _ProcTimeBoundedRangeOver_ would throws NPE if _minRetentionTime_ and _maxRetentionTime_ are set to greater then 1. 
> Please see [^npe_from_ProcTimeBoundedRangeOver.txt] for the detail of  exception. Below is a short description of the cause:
>  * When the first event for a key arrives,  the cleanup time is registered with _timerservice_ and recorded in _cleanupTimeState_. If the second event with same key arrives before the cleanup time, the value in _cleanupTimeState_ is updated and a new timer is registered to _timerService_. So now we have two registered timers for cleanup. One is registered because of the first event, the other for the second event.
>  * However, when _onTimer_ method is fired for the first cleanup timer, the _cleanupTimeStates_ value has already been updated to second cleanup time. So it will bypass the _needToCleanupState_ check, and yet run through the remained code of _onTimer_ (which is intended to update the accumulator and emit output) and cause NPE.
> _RowTimeBoundedRangeOver_ has very similar logic with _ProcTimeBoundedRangeOver. But_ It won't cause NPE by the same reason. To avoid the exception, it simply add a null check before running the logic for updating accumulator.
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)