You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by SubrahmanyamSistha <gi...@git.apache.org> on 2018/09/06 11:08:39 UTC

[GitHub] wicket pull request #291: Fix org.junit as resolution:=optional

GitHub user SubrahmanyamSistha opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/291

    Fix org.junit as resolution:=optional

    wicket-core and the wicket-util bundle import junit packages,
    
    org.junit, junit.framework making as resolution:=optional
    
    refer 
    http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-core-and-util-OSGI-wiring-problem-with-junit-framework-with-test-environment-td4680840.html

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/SubrahmanyamSistha/wicket fix-org.junit-osgi-w8

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/291.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #291
    
----
commit d170946b3e88b1e71243d57b9c1ec2dc58dad809
Author: Subrahmanyam Sitha <su...@...>
Date:   2018-09-06T10:47:09Z

    Fix org.junit as resolution:=optional

----


---

[GitHub] wicket issue #291: Fix org.junit as resolution:=optional

Posted by martin-g <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user martin-g commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/291
  
    @SubrahmanyamSistha Please close this PR! It has been applied 20 days ago.


---

[GitHub] wicket issue #291: Fix org.junit as resolution:=optional

Posted by bitstorm <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user bitstorm commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/291
  
    Hi,
    I've merged this commit with 8.x and master branch. Can you close di PR?
    
    Thank you.


---

[GitHub] wicket issue #291: Fix org.junit as resolution:=optional

Posted by martin-g <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user martin-g commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/291
  
    @SubrahmanyamSistha Ping!


---