You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> on 2021/05/27 13:38:19 UTC
What to focus on next
> On May 21, 2021, at 5:02 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 14.05.21 um 18:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> On May 14, 2021, at 1:27 AM, Arrigo Marchiori <ar...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I agree, but how many 4.1.X versions do we want to publish before 4.2.0?
>>> Now that we support two digits, please let us not point to 4.1.99 ! ;-)
>>>
>> FWIW, I tend to agree. We fixed the bug. Maybe its not the best solution, but I don't see why we should continue to "focus" on 4.1.X at the expense of 4.2.X.
>
> We already made some progress on the Release Blockers for 4.2.0.
> But the remaining ones are untouched for long time.
>
> What about a 4.2.0-Dev3? We already planned it when 4.1.10 got urgent...
>
> Regards,
>
So should the push be 4.1.11 or 4.2.0-Dev3?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: What to focus on next
Posted by Marcus <ma...@wtnet.de>.
Am 27.05.21 um 19:53 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 27.05.21 um 19:38 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 27.05.21 um 19:10 schrieb Marcus:
>>> Am 27.05.21 um 16:18 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>> Am 27.05.21 um 16:07 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>>>>> IMO there are a couple more issues like hyperlink protocols to
>>>>> always allow to look into before 4.1.11 builds. So, if you are
>>>>> looking to build right now then 4.2.0dev.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, 4.2.0-Dev3 would simply be an official "snapshot" of what we have
>>>> in branch AOO42X.
>>>>
>>>> 4.1.11 needs a lot more work to be released.
>>>>
>>>>> Maybe a thread on the release blockers for 4.2.0?
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>
>>> please not as mails. IMHO this will end in a total mess and nobody is
>>> able to keep the overview. ;-)
>> Good idea!
>>>
>>> Better to create a Confluence page, start with the list of opened and
>>> targeted issues [1]. Then we can discuss which issues we can fix for
>>> 4.2.0.
>>
>> I would simply start with the list of Release Blockers:
>>
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&f1=flagtypes.name&list_id=248770&o1=substring&order=changeddate%20DESC%2Cbug_id%20DESC&query_based_on=4.2.0_blocker_requested%2B&query_format=advanced&resolution=---&resolution=FIXED&v1=4.2.0_release_blocker
>>
>
> I've started this list:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Blocker+issues+4.2.0
>
> Will now add the classified blockers also.
done.
Let's start the discussion now.
Marcus
>>>>>> On May 27, 2021, at 6:41 AM, Matthias Seidel
>>>>>> <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>> Am 27.05.21 um 15:38 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>>>> On May 21, 2021, at 5:02 AM, Matthias Seidel
>>>>>>>>> <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Am 14.05.21 um 18:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>>>>> On May 14, 2021, at 1:27 AM, Arrigo Marchiori
>>>>>>>>>> <ar...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I agree, but how many 4.1.X versions do we want to publish
>>>>>>>>>> before 4.2.0?
>>>>>>>>>> Now that we support two digits, please let us not point to
>>>>>>>>>> 4.1.99 ! ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> FWIW, I tend to agree. We fixed the bug. Maybe its not the best
>>>>>>>>> solution, but I don't see why we should continue to "focus" on
>>>>>>>>> 4.1.X at the expense of 4.2.X.
>>>>>>>> We already made some progress on the Release Blockers for 4.2.0.
>>>>>>>> But the remaining ones are untouched for long time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What about a 4.2.0-Dev3? We already planned it when 4.1.10 got
>>>>>>>> urgent...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So should the push be 4.1.11 or 4.2.0-Dev3?
>>>>>> I don't see a problem to do both?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: What to focus on next
Posted by Marcus <ma...@wtnet.de>.
Am 27.05.21 um 19:38 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Am 27.05.21 um 19:10 schrieb Marcus:
>> Am 27.05.21 um 16:18 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Am 27.05.21 um 16:07 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>>>> IMO there are a couple more issues like hyperlink protocols to
>>>> always allow to look into before 4.1.11 builds. So, if you are
>>>> looking to build right now then 4.2.0dev.
>>>
>>> Yes, 4.2.0-Dev3 would simply be an official "snapshot" of what we have
>>> in branch AOO42X.
>>>
>>> 4.1.11 needs a lot more work to be released.
>>>
>>>> Maybe a thread on the release blockers for 4.2.0?
>>>
>>> +1
>>
>> please not as mails. IMHO this will end in a total mess and nobody is
>> able to keep the overview. ;-)
> Good idea!
>>
>> Better to create a Confluence page, start with the list of opened and
>> targeted issues [1]. Then we can discuss which issues we can fix for
>> 4.2.0.
>
> I would simply start with the list of Release Blockers:
>
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&f1=flagtypes.name&list_id=248770&o1=substring&order=changeddate%20DESC%2Cbug_id%20DESC&query_based_on=4.2.0_blocker_requested%2B&query_format=advanced&resolution=---&resolution=FIXED&v1=4.2.0_release_blocker
I've started this list:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Blocker+issues+4.2.0
Will now add the classified blockers also.
Marcus
>> [1]
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&resolution=---&target_milestone=4.2.0
>>
>> Marcus
>>
>>
>>
>>>>> On May 27, 2021, at 6:41 AM, Matthias Seidel
>>>>> <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>> Am 27.05.21 um 15:38 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>>> On May 21, 2021, at 5:02 AM, Matthias Seidel
>>>>>>>> <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>> Am 14.05.21 um 18:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>>>> On May 14, 2021, at 1:27 AM, Arrigo Marchiori
>>>>>>>>> <ar...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I agree, but how many 4.1.X versions do we want to publish
>>>>>>>>> before 4.2.0?
>>>>>>>>> Now that we support two digits, please let us not point to
>>>>>>>>> 4.1.99 ! ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> FWIW, I tend to agree. We fixed the bug. Maybe its not the best
>>>>>>>> solution, but I don't see why we should continue to "focus" on
>>>>>>>> 4.1.X at the expense of 4.2.X.
>>>>>>> We already made some progress on the Release Blockers for 4.2.0.
>>>>>>> But the remaining ones are untouched for long time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What about a 4.2.0-Dev3? We already planned it when 4.1.10 got
>>>>>>> urgent...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> So should the push be 4.1.11 or 4.2.0-Dev3?
>>>>> I don't see a problem to do both?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: What to focus on next
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi Marcus,
Am 27.05.21 um 19:10 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 27.05.21 um 16:18 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 27.05.21 um 16:07 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>>> IMO there are a couple more issues like hyperlink protocols to
>>> always allow to look into before 4.1.11 builds. So, if you are
>>> looking to build right now then 4.2.0dev.
>>
>> Yes, 4.2.0-Dev3 would simply be an official "snapshot" of what we have
>> in branch AOO42X.
>>
>> 4.1.11 needs a lot more work to be released.
>>
>>> Maybe a thread on the release blockers for 4.2.0?
>>
>> +1
>
> please not as mails. IMHO this will end in a total mess and nobody is
> able to keep the overview. ;-)
Good idea!
>
> Better to create a Confluence page, start with the list of opened and
> targeted issues [1]. Then we can discuss which issues we can fix for
> 4.2.0.
I would simply start with the list of Release Blockers:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&f1=flagtypes.name&list_id=248770&o1=substring&order=changeddate%20DESC%2Cbug_id%20DESC&query_based_on=4.2.0_blocker_requested%2B&query_format=advanced&resolution=---&resolution=FIXED&v1=4.2.0_release_blocker
Matthias
>
> [1]
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&resolution=---&target_milestone=4.2.0
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
>>>> On May 27, 2021, at 6:41 AM, Matthias Seidel
>>>> <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>> Am 27.05.21 um 15:38 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>> On May 21, 2021, at 5:02 AM, Matthias Seidel
>>>>>>> <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>> Am 14.05.21 um 18:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>>> On May 14, 2021, at 1:27 AM, Arrigo Marchiori
>>>>>>>> <ar...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I agree, but how many 4.1.X versions do we want to publish
>>>>>>>> before 4.2.0?
>>>>>>>> Now that we support two digits, please let us not point to
>>>>>>>> 4.1.99 ! ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FWIW, I tend to agree. We fixed the bug. Maybe its not the best
>>>>>>> solution, but I don't see why we should continue to "focus" on
>>>>>>> 4.1.X at the expense of 4.2.X.
>>>>>> We already made some progress on the Release Blockers for 4.2.0.
>>>>>> But the remaining ones are untouched for long time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What about a 4.2.0-Dev3? We already planned it when 4.1.10 got
>>>>>> urgent...
>>>>>>
>>>>> So should the push be 4.1.11 or 4.2.0-Dev3?
>>>> I don't see a problem to do both?
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
Re: What to focus on next
Posted by Marcus <ma...@wtnet.de>.
Am 27.05.21 um 16:18 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Am 27.05.21 um 16:07 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>> IMO there are a couple more issues like hyperlink protocols to always allow to look into before 4.1.11 builds. So, if you are looking to build right now then 4.2.0dev.
>
> Yes, 4.2.0-Dev3 would simply be an official "snapshot" of what we have
> in branch AOO42X.
>
> 4.1.11 needs a lot more work to be released.
>
>> Maybe a thread on the release blockers for 4.2.0?
>
> +1
please not as mails. IMHO this will end in a total mess and nobody is
able to keep the overview. ;-)
Better to create a Confluence page, start with the list of opened and
targeted issues [1]. Then we can discuss which issues we can fix for 4.2.0.
[1]
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&resolution=---&target_milestone=4.2.0
Marcus
>>> On May 27, 2021, at 6:41 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>> Am 27.05.21 um 15:38 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>> On May 21, 2021, at 5:02 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>> Am 14.05.21 um 18:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>> On May 14, 2021, at 1:27 AM, Arrigo Marchiori <ar...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I agree, but how many 4.1.X versions do we want to publish before 4.2.0?
>>>>>>> Now that we support two digits, please let us not point to 4.1.99 ! ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> FWIW, I tend to agree. We fixed the bug. Maybe its not the best solution, but I don't see why we should continue to "focus" on 4.1.X at the expense of 4.2.X.
>>>>> We already made some progress on the Release Blockers for 4.2.0.
>>>>> But the remaining ones are untouched for long time.
>>>>>
>>>>> What about a 4.2.0-Dev3? We already planned it when 4.1.10 got urgent...
>>>>>
>>>> So should the push be 4.1.11 or 4.2.0-Dev3?
>>> I don't see a problem to do both?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: What to focus on next
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi Dave,
Am 27.05.21 um 16:07 schrieb Dave Fisher:
> IMO there are a couple more issues like hyperlink protocols to always allow to look into before 4.1.11 builds. So, if you are looking to build right now then 4.2.0dev.
Yes, 4.2.0-Dev3 would simply be an official "snapshot" of what we have
in branch AOO42X.
4.1.11 needs a lot more work to be released.
>
> Maybe a thread on the release blockers for 4.2.0?
+1
Regards,
Matthias
>
> All The Best,
> Dave
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On May 27, 2021, at 6:41 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>>> Am 27.05.21 um 15:38 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>
>>>>> On May 21, 2021, at 5:02 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>
>>>> Am 14.05.21 um 18:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>> On May 14, 2021, at 1:27 AM, Arrigo Marchiori <ar...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree, but how many 4.1.X versions do we want to publish before 4.2.0?
>>>>>> Now that we support two digits, please let us not point to 4.1.99 ! ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>> FWIW, I tend to agree. We fixed the bug. Maybe its not the best solution, but I don't see why we should continue to "focus" on 4.1.X at the expense of 4.2.X.
>>>> We already made some progress on the Release Blockers for 4.2.0.
>>>> But the remaining ones are untouched for long time.
>>>>
>>>> What about a 4.2.0-Dev3? We already planned it when 4.1.10 got urgent...
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>> So should the push be 4.1.11 or 4.2.0-Dev3?
>> I don't see a problem to do both?
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
Re: What to focus on next
Posted by Dave Fisher <wa...@comcast.net>.
IMO there are a couple more issues like hyperlink protocols to always allow to look into before 4.1.11 builds. So, if you are looking to build right now then 4.2.0dev.
Maybe a thread on the release blockers for 4.2.0?
All The Best,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 27, 2021, at 6:41 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
>> Am 27.05.21 um 15:38 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>
>>>> On May 21, 2021, at 5:02 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jim,
>>>
>>> Am 14.05.21 um 18:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>> On May 14, 2021, at 1:27 AM, Arrigo Marchiori <ar...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree, but how many 4.1.X versions do we want to publish before 4.2.0?
>>>>> Now that we support two digits, please let us not point to 4.1.99 ! ;-)
>>>>>
>>>> FWIW, I tend to agree. We fixed the bug. Maybe its not the best solution, but I don't see why we should continue to "focus" on 4.1.X at the expense of 4.2.X.
>>> We already made some progress on the Release Blockers for 4.2.0.
>>> But the remaining ones are untouched for long time.
>>>
>>> What about a 4.2.0-Dev3? We already planned it when 4.1.10 got urgent...
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>> So should the push be 4.1.11 or 4.2.0-Dev3?
>
> I don't see a problem to do both?
>
> Matthias
>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: What to focus on next
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi Jim,
Am 27.05.21 um 15:38 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>
>> On May 21, 2021, at 5:02 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> Am 14.05.21 um 18:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>> On May 14, 2021, at 1:27 AM, Arrigo Marchiori <ar...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I agree, but how many 4.1.X versions do we want to publish before 4.2.0?
>>>> Now that we support two digits, please let us not point to 4.1.99 ! ;-)
>>>>
>>> FWIW, I tend to agree. We fixed the bug. Maybe its not the best solution, but I don't see why we should continue to "focus" on 4.1.X at the expense of 4.2.X.
>> We already made some progress on the Release Blockers for 4.2.0.
>> But the remaining ones are untouched for long time.
>>
>> What about a 4.2.0-Dev3? We already planned it when 4.1.10 got urgent...
>>
>> Regards,
>>
> So should the push be 4.1.11 or 4.2.0-Dev3?
I don't see a problem to do both?
Matthias
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>