You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@thrift.apache.org by "Sylwester Lachiewicz (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2026/09/08 13:47:01 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (THRIFT-5105) Very minor issue: why are the values for "unlimited" different between Java and cpp?
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-5105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Sylwester Lachiewicz updated THRIFT-5105:
-----------------------------------------
Issue Type: Bug (was: Improvement)
> Very minor issue: why are the values for "unlimited" different between Java and cpp?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: THRIFT-5105
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-5105
> Project: Thrift
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: C++ - Library
> Affects Versions: 0.13.0
> Reporter: Mario Emmenlauer
> Priority: Trivial
>
> I've seen that in Java, [https://github.com/apache/thrift/blob/882d48da5d5db439c11029f46006c71f6429ae2c/lib/java/src/org/apache/thrift/protocol/TBinaryProtocol.java#L34] defines a constant {{NO_LENGTH_LIMIT = -1}} to initialize string_limit and container_limit of TBinaryProtocol. In C++ on the other hand, the default values (I guess they represent unlimited) are set in [https://github.com/apache/thrift/blob/042580f53441efe1bc5c80c89351fcb30740659e/lib/cpp/src/thrift/protocol/TBinaryProtocol.h#L47] with {{string_limit_(0)}}.
>
> This is really no big issue but for consistency it may be nicer if all implementation use the same default for "unlimited"?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)